Dataset Information

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Isavuconazole: Serum Concentration Variability and Success Rates for Reaching Target in Comparison with Voriconazole.

ABSTRACT: Isavuconazole (ISZ) is used in the treatment of aspergillosis and mucormycosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ISZ samples from a clinical setting performed at Statens Serum Institut. Materials/methods: Isavuconazole serum concentrations were determined by fluorescent detection on a UHPLC. Serum-ISZ (s-ISZ) results were included and compared to those of serum-voriconazole (s-VRZ) in a 33 month period from March 2017. Clinical data were obtained for patients receiving ISZ. The therapeutic range was initially 2-10 mg/L, but was adjusted to 2-5 mg/L during the study period except for selected patients with Mucorales infections who received off-label doses of ISZ. Results: A total of 273 s-ISZ and 1242 s-VRZ measurements from 35 and 283 patients, respectively, were included. Seventeen patients had received both ISZ and VRZ with TDM within the study period. The median s-ISZ was 4.3 mg/L (0.5-15.4 mg/L) with 83% of measurements within the therapeutic index. The median s-VRZ was 2.6 mg/L (0.2-21.9 mg/L) with 67% of measurements within the therapeutic index. The median intra-/interindividual coefficient of variation (CV) was 43.4%/54.8% for ISZ compared to 53.2%/83.3% for VRZ. For patients receiving ISZ, the adverse events were mostly gastroenteric and few drug-drug interactions were observed. Furthermore, immediate change from ISZ to VRZ treatment seemed to lead to prolonged metabolism of ISZ with detection up to 35 days after discontinuation. Conclusions: The majority of patients achieved s-ISZ levels well within the therapeutic range with less intra/interindividual CV than patients receiving VRZ.

SUBMITTER: Risum M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8145181 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTherapeutic drug monitoring for voriconazole is recommended for its optimum pharmacotherapy. Although the feedback of the measurement result of serum voriconazole concentration by outsourcing needs a certain time (days within a 1 week), there was no medical equipment for the measurement available in clinical practice. Recently, a medical equipment based on high performance liquid chromatography, named LM1010, has been developed and authorized for clinical use. In this study, to validate the clinical performance of LM1010, we compared the measured serum voriconazole concentrations by LM1010 with those by outsourcing measurement using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.MethodsWe conducted the observational study approved by the institutional review board of Kumamoto University Hospital (No. 1786). Residual serum samples harvested for therapeutic drug monitoring were separated. Measured concentrations by LM1010 by the standard filter method (needs serum volume of > 400 μL) or the dilute method (needs serum volume of 150 μL) were compared with those by outsourcing, respectively. Acceptable measurement error range of 0.72-1.33 was considered. There were 69 serum samples, where the 35 or 34 samples were employed for evaluation of the standard filter method or the dilute method, respectively.ResultsThe measured concentration using the standard filter method/outsourcing was 2.22/2.10 μg/mL as the median, 1.57-3.40/1.53-3.62 as the interquartile range, < 0.2-10.76/< 0.2-11.46 μg/mL as the range, while those using the dilute method/outsourcing was 2.36/2.29 μg/mL as the median, 1.08-2.94/1.03-3.06 as the interquartile range, 0.24-10.00/< 0.2-10.85 μg/mL as the range. The regression line for the standard filter method or the dilute method were y = 0.935x + 0.154 or y = 0.933x + 0.162, respectively. The standard filter method or the dilute method showed 11.4% samples (4/35, 95%CI 3.2-26.7%) or 8.8% samples (3/34, 95%CI 1.9-23.7%) out of the acceptable measurement error range, respectively.ConclusionMeasurement of serum voriconazole concentration by LM1010 can be acceptable in clinical TDM practice.

Project description:BackgroundVoriconazole is well established as standard treatment for invasive aspergillosis (IA). In 2017, isavuconazole, a new antifungal from the azole class, with a broader pathogen spectrum, was introduced in Sweden. A model has therefore been developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of isavuconazole and voriconazole in the treatment of possible IA in adults in Sweden.MethodsThe cost-effectiveness of isavuconazole versus voriconazole was evaluated using a decision-tree model. Patients with possible IA entered the model, with 6% assumed to actually have mucormycosis. It was also assumed that pathogen information would become available during the course of treatment for only 50% of patients, with differential diagnosis unavailable for the remainder. Patients who were considered unresponsive to first-line treatment were switched to second-line treatment with liposomal amphotericin-B. Data and clinical definitions included in the model were taken from the published randomised clinical trial comparing isavuconazole with voriconazole for the treatment of IA and other filamentous fungi (SECURE) and the single-arm, open-label trial and case-control analysis of isavuconazole for the treatment of mucormycosis (VITAL). A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to estimate the combined parameter uncertainty, and a deterministic sensitivity analysis and a scenario analysis were performed to test the robustness of the model assumptions. The model followed a Swedish healthcare payer perspective, therefore only considering direct medical costs.ResultsThe base case analysis showed that isavuconazole resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 174,890 Swedish krona (SEK) per additional quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. This was mainly due to the efficacy of isavuconazole against IA and mucormycosis, as opposed to voriconazole, which is only effective against IA. Sensitivity and scenario analyses of the data showed that the average ICER consistently fell below the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of 1,000,000 SEK. The probability of isavuconazole being cost-effective at a WTP of 170,000 SEK per QALY gained was 50% and at a WTP of 500,000 SEK per QALY gained was 100%.ConclusionsThis model suggests that the treatment of possible IA with isavuconazole is cost-effective compared with treatment with voriconazole from a Swedish healthcare payer perspective.

Dataset Information

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Isavuconazole: Serum Concentration Variability and Success Rates for Reaching Target in Comparison with Voriconazole.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets