Dataset Information

Algorithm for management of an incarcerated inguinal hernia in the emergency settings with manual reduction. Taxis, the technique and its safety.

ABSTRACT:

Background

An acute inguinal hernia remains a common emergency surgical condition worldwide. While emergency surgery has a major role to play in treatment of acute hernias, not all patients are fit for emergency surgery, nor are facilities for such surgery always available. Taxis is the manual reduction of incarcerated tissues from the hernia sack to its natural compartment, and can help delay the need for surgery from days to months. The aim of this study was to prepare a safe algorithm for performing manual reduction of incarcerated inguinal hernias in adults.

Methods

Medline, Scopus, Ovid and Embase were searched for papers related to emergency inguinal hernias and manual reduction. In addition, the British National Formulary and Safe Sedation Practice for Healthcare Procedures: Standards and Guidance were reviewed.

Results

A safe technique of manual reduction of an acute inguinal hernia, called GPS (Gentle, Prepared and Safe) Taxis, is described. It should be performed within 24 h from the onset of a painful irreducible lump in groin, and when concomitant symptoms and signs of bowel strangulation are absent. Conscious sedation guidelines should be followed. The most popular drug combination is of intravenous morphine and short-acting benzodiazepine, both titrated carefully for optimal and safe effect. The dose of drugs must be individualised, and the smallest effective dosage should be used to avoid oversedation. Following successful taxis, the patient should undergo a short period of observation. Urgent surgery can be undertaken during the same admission or up to several weeks later.

Conclusions

Taxis is a benign/non-invasive method for patients with an acute, non-strangulated inguinal hernias. It likely reduces the risk and complications of anaesthesia and surgery in the emergency settings. GPS Taxis should be considered as first line treatment in the majority of patients presenting with an acute inguinal hernia when existing bowel infarction is unlikely.

SUBMITTER: Pawlak M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8147903 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSARS-Cov-2 infects not only adults, but also children, including pediatric surgery patients with acute abdomen. Here, we report a pediatric surgery case with incarcerated inguinal hernia and suspected COVID-19.Case presentationA 11-month-old male was brought to our emergency department with the main complaint of recurrent yellowish-green vomiting that was experienced from one day before admission. High fever and shortness of breath were also reported. This patient was also suffering from moderate dehydration. Neither history of contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19 nor traveling from any local transmission area were found. However, a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antibody test revealed a positive result. A lump in the left scrotum that persisted during admission was found. Fluid resuscitation and nasogastric tube placement for decompression was performed. Manual reduction was attempted but failed to reduce the lump. Accordingly, we decided to perform an emergency high ligation using tertiary protection regulations, i.e., full personal protective equipment (PPE) for COVID-19. Intraoperatively, we found a small intestine loop trapped in the scrotum and stuck in the inguinal canal. Postoperatively, the baby was continued to be managed as a patient with COVID-19 while waiting for the real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results.DiscussionManual reduction is standard treatment for incarcerated inguinal hernia in children. The successful rate of manual reduction is about 70%, therefore, if the manual reduction fails, an emergency surgery is mandatory.During the COVID-19 pandemic, all medical procedures require clarity of the patient's status including whether infected with COVID-19. Along with proper precautions, great care must be taken during surgery to minimize the risk of cross infection to health workers.ConclusionsDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, surgeons should always be aware of the possibility of cross-transmission from the patient, since children are also susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection. When and wherever possible, surgeons should perform the procedure in the quickest and most effective manner to shorten exposure time with patient and anesthetic aerosols as well as using appropriate PPE.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Pampiniform plexus thrombosis is a very rare disease (only less than 25 published cases are available till date), and it is a diagnostic dilemma. The present case is an unusual condition of an elderly gentleman who was finally diagnosed as a case of spontaneous thrombosis of bilateral pampiniform plexus and was managed conservatively. Literature was reviewed to explore potential etiologies and therapeutic strategies. CASE PRESENTATION:A 65-year-old afebrile gentleman, laborer (in brick industry), and non-smoker with no previous major health problems was admitted with swelling in the bilateral inguinal region. The swelling had started one and half months ago. He had developed severe pain over the swelling for last 1?day with tenderness and indurations. Neither he had history of previous surgeries, chronic cough, dysuria, prostatism, and trauma nor he presented any thrombogenic factors. There was no history of vomiting, abdominal pain, and obstipation. Physical examination revealed normotensive person with BMI of 22.5, was significant only for one tender, movable, and firm to hard 10?cm?×?3?cm mass extending from the left deep inguinal ring up to the upper pole of the testis in the scrotum. Another 5 cm?×?3?cm mass of similar characteristics was found extending from deep inguinal ring up to the root of the scrotum on right side. The testes and prostate were normal on palpation. On the contrary to preoperative USG, which clinched suspicion of incarcerated inguinal hernia, a thrombosed pampiniform plexus without any evidence of hernia sac was found on the left side during inguino-scrotal exploration. Wound was closed without doing any further procedure. Contralateral inguino-scrotal exploration was spared considering same nature of disease. Postoperative Doppler ultrasonography confirmed the diagnosis of bilateral thrombosed pampiniform plexus. MDCT of whole abdomen revealed no abnormality other than bilateral spermatic cord thrombosis. Blood thrombophilia screening came normal. The subject had an uneventful postoperative hospital course. With 2 years of follow-up, the gentleman is doing well, remaining asymptomatic and had returned to his usual life. CONCLUSIONS:Due to extreme rarity, spontaneous thrombosis of the pampiniform plexus may be a diagnostic dilemma and requires a high index of suspicion. Doppler ultrasound is the initial investigation of choice. In the absence of other concomitant disease, beginning the treatment conservatively instead of excising the thrombosed segment is more suitable.