Dataset Information

Genetic Risk for Hepatic Fat among an Ethnically Diverse Cohort of Youth: The Exploring Perinatal Outcomes among Children Study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To assess the importance of genetic and nongenetic risk factors contributing to hepatic fat accumulation in a multiethnic population of youth.

Study design

We investigated the relationship between genetic factors and hepatic fat fraction (HFF) in 347 children aged 12.5-19.5 years. We examined 5 single nucleotide polymorphisms previously associated with HFF and a weighted genetic risk score (GRS) and examined how these associations varied with ethnicity (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic white) and body mass index (BMI) category. We also compared how much variation in HFF was explained by genetic factors vs cardiometabolic factors (BMI z-score and the Homeostasis Model of Insulin Resistance) or diet.

Results

PNPLA3 rs738409 and the GRS were each associated with HFF among Hispanic (β = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.62; P = .001; and β = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05-0.34; P = .007, respectively) but not non-Hispanic white (β = 0.04; 95% CI, -0.18 to 0.26; P = .696; and β = 0.03; 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.14; P = .651, respectively) youth. Cardiometabolic risk factors explained more of the variation in HFF than genetic risk factors among non-lean Hispanic individuals (27.2% for cardiometabolic markers vs 6.4% for rs738409 and 4.3% for the GRS), and genetic risk factors were more important among lean individuals (2.7% for cardiometabolic markers vs 12.6% for rs738409 and 4.4% for the GRS).

Conclusions

Poor cardiometabolic health may be more important than genetic factors when predicting HFF in overweight and obese young populations. Genetic risk is an important contributor to pediatric HFF among lean Hispanics, but further studies are necessary to elucidate the strength of the association between genetic risk and HFF in non-Hispanic white youth.

SUBMITTER: Stanislawski MA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8148653 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLittle is known about the psychological outcomes of germline multigene panel testing, particularly among diverse patients and those with moderate-risk pathogenic variants (PVs).MethodsStudy participants (N = 1264) were counseled and tested with a 25- or 28-gene panel and completed a 3-month postresult survey including the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA).ResultsThe mean age was 52 years, 80% were female, and 70% had cancer; 45% were non-Hispanic White, 37% were Hispanic, 10% were Asian, 3% were Black, and 5% had another race/ethnicity. Approximately 28% had a high school education or less, and 23% were non-English-speaking. The genetic test results were as follows: 7% had a high-risk PV, 6% had a moderate-risk PV, 35% had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), and 52% were negative. Most participants (92%) had a total MICRA score ≤ 38, which corresponded to a mean response of "never," "rarely," or only "sometimes" reacting negatively to results. A multivariate analysis found that mean total MICRA scores were significantly higher (more uncertainty/distress) among high- and moderate-risk PV carriers (29.7 and 24.8, respectively) than those with a VUS or negative results (17.4 and 16.1, respectively). Having cancer or less education was associated with a significantly higher total MICRA score; race/ethnicity was not associated with the total MICRA score. High- and moderate-risk PV carriers did not differ significantly from one another in the total MICRA score, uncertainty, distress, or positive experiences.ConclusionsIn a diverse population undergoing genetic counseling and multigene panel testing for hereditary cancer risk, the psychological response corresponded to test results and showed low distress and uncertainty. Further studies are needed to assess patient understanding and subsequent cancer screening among patients from diverse backgrounds.Lay summaryMultigene panel tests for hereditary cancer have become widespread despite concerns about adverse psychological reactions among carriers of moderate-risk pathogenic variants (mutations) and among carriers of variants of uncertain significance. This large study of an ethnically and economically diverse cohort of patients undergoing panel testing found that 92% "never," "rarely," or only "sometimes" reacted negatively to results. Somewhat higher uncertainty and distress were identified among carriers of high- and moderate-risk pathogenic variants, and lower levels were identified among those with a variant of uncertain significance or a negative result. Although the psychological response corresponded to risk, reactions to testing were favorable, regardless of results.

Project description:Background:Older age and medical comorbidities are identified risk factors for developing severe coronavirus disease 2019. However, there are limited data on risk stratification, clinical and laboratory course, and optimal management of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy. Objective:Our study aimed to describe the clinical course of coronavirus disease 2019, effect of comorbidities on disease severity, laboratory trends, and pregnancy outcomes of symptomatic and asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-positive pregnant women. Study Design:This is a case series of pregnant and postpartum women who received positive test results for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 between March 3, 2020, and May 11, 2020, within 3 hospitals of the Yale New Haven Health delivery network. Charts were reviewed for basic sociodemographic and prepregnancy characteristics, coronavirus disease 2019 course, laboratory values, and pregnancy outcomes. Results:Of the 1567 tested pregnant and postpartum women between March 3, 2020, and May 11, 2020, 9% (n=141) had a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 result. Hispanic women were overrepresented in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-positive group (n=61; 43.8%). In addition, Hispanic ethnicity was associated with a higher rate of moderate and severe diseases than non-Hispanic (18% [11/61] vs 3.8% [3/78], respectively; odds ratio, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-20.7; P=.01). Of note, 44 women (31.2%) were asymptomatic, 37 of whom (26.2%) were diagnosed on universal screening upon admission for delivery. Moreover, 59% (n=83) were diagnosed before delivery, 36% (n=51) upon presentation for childbirth, and 5% (n=7) after delivery. Severe disease was diagnosed in 6 cases (4.3%), and there was 1 maternal death. Obese women were more likely to develop moderate and severe diseases than nonobese women (16.4% [9/55] vs 3.8% [3/79]; odds ratio, 4.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-19.25; P=.02). Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were diagnosed in 22.3% of women (17/77) who delivered after 20 weeks' gestation. Higher levels of C-reactive protein during antepartum coronavirus disease 2019-related admission were more common in women with worse clinical course; however, this association did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion:Coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy may result in severe disease and death. Hispanic women were more likely to receive a positive test result for severe acute respiratory syndrome 2 than other ethnic groups. Obesity and Hispanic ethnicity represent risk factors for moderate and severe diseases.

Project description:Most genetic studies of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) have been conducted in Whites. In this large and ethnically diverse cohort, we assessed the transportability of previously identified genetic variants for NAFLD, built a genetic risk score (GRS), and examined its association with NAFLD risk in multiple ethnic groups. Thirty previously identified genome-wide association studies (GWAS) variants (P < 5 × 10-8 ) and 17 other variants associated with NAFLD were examined in a nested case-control study of NAFLD (1,448 cases/8,444 controls) in this multi-ethnic cohort study. We then built a GRS using 11 independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms from these prior studies and examined its association with NAFLD by cirrhosis status across multiple ethnic groups. Of the 30 GWAS SNPs, 20 (67%) were replicated (P < 0.05) in the pooled multi-ethnic population. The highest percentage of replication was seen in Latinos (43%), followed by Japanese Americans (37%), Whites (17%), and Native Hawaiians and African Americans (≤10%). Several genetic variants, including those in PNPLA3 (patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 3), HSD17B13 (hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 13), TM6SF2 (transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2), GATAD2A (GATA zinc finger domain containing 2A), GCKR (glucokinase regulator), SUGP1 (SURP and G-patch domain containing 1), MBOAT7 (membrane bound O-acyltransferase domain containing 7), TRIB1 (tribbles pseudokinase 1), SAMM50 (sorting and assembly machinery component), and ERLIN1 (ER lipid raft associated 1)-CHUK (component of inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B kinase complex)-CWF19L1 (CWF19 like cell cycle control factor 1) gene cluster, were replicated in at least two ethnic groups. An 11-SNP weighted GRS was associated with NAFLD risk in the multi-ethnic population (odds ratio [OR] per SD increase = 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.32-1.50), as well as in each ethnic group (OR ranged from 1.30 in African Americans to 1.52 in Latinos). The GRS-NAFLD association was stronger for NAFLD with cirrhosis (OR = 1.67; 95% CI = 1.46-1.92) compared to NAFLD without cirrhosis (OR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.28-1.46) (P heterogeneity = 0.003). Conclusion: In this ethnically diverse cohort, we replicated several key genetic variants for NAFLD and showed the utility of GRS based on the risk alleles for NAFLD risk stratification in multiple ethnic groups.