Dataset Information

Tutorial on Biostatistics: Longitudinal Analysis of Correlated Continuous Eye Data.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To describe and demonstrate methods for analyzing longitudinal correlated eye data with a continuous outcome measure.

Methods

We described fixed effects, mixed effects and generalized estimating equations (GEE) models, applied them to data from the Complications of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial (CAPT) and the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS). In CAPT (N = 1052), we assessed the effect of eye-specific laser treatment on change in visual acuity (VA). In the AREDS study, we evaluated effects of systemic supplement treatment among 1463 participants with AMD category 3.

Results

In CAPT, the inter-eye correlations (0.33 to 0.53) and longitudinal correlations (0.31 to 0.88) varied. There was a small treatment effect on VA change (approximately one letter) at 24 months for all three models (p = .009 to 0.02). Model fit was better with the mixed effects model than the fixed effects model (p < .001). In AREDS, there was no significant treatment effect in all models (p > .55). Current smokers had a significantly greater VA decline than non-current smokers in the fixed effects model (p = .04) and the mixed effects model with random intercept (p = .0003), but marginally significant in the mixed effects model with random intercept and slope (p = .08), and GEE models (p = .054 to 0.07). The model fit was better with the fixed effects model than the mixed effects model (p < .0001).

Conclusion

Longitudinal models using the eye as the unit of analysis can be implemented using available statistical software to account for both inter-eye and longitudinal correlations. Goodness-of-fit statistics may guide the selection of the most appropriate model.

SUBMITTER: Ying GS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8150110 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHuman immunology is a growing field of research in which experimental, clinical, and analytical methods of many life science disciplines are utilized. Classic epidemiological study designs, including observational longitudinal birth cohort studies, offer strong potential for gaining new knowledge and insights into immune response to pathogens in humans. However, rigorous discussion of methodological issues related to designs and statistical analysis that are appropriate for longitudinal studies is lacking.MethodsIn this communication we address key questions of quality and validity of traditional and recently developed statistical tools applied to measures of immune responses. For this purpose we use data on humoral immune response (IR) associated with the first cryptosporidial diarrhea in a birth cohort of children residing in an urban slum in south India. The main objective is to detect the difference and derive inferences for a change in IR measured at two time points, before (pre) and after (post) an event of interest. We illustrate the use and interpretation of analytical and data visualization techniques including generalized linear and additive models, data-driven smoothing, and combinations of box-, scatter-, and needle-plots.ResultsWe provide step-by-step instructions for conducting a thorough and relatively simple analytical investigation, describe the challenges and pitfalls, and offer practical solutions for comprehensive examination of data. We illustrate how the assumption of time irrelevance can be handled in a study with a pre-post design. We demonstrate how one can study the dynamics of IR in humans by considering the timing of response following an event of interest and seasonal fluctuation of exposure by proper alignment of time of measurements. This alignment of calendar time of measurements and a child's age at the event of interest allows us to explore interactions between IR, seasonal exposures and age at first infection.ConclusionsThe use of traditional statistical techniques to analyze immunological data derived from observational human studies can result in loss of important information. Detailed analysis using well-tailored techniques allows the depiction of new features of immune response to a pathogen in longitudinal studies in humans. The proposed staged approach has prominent implications for future study designs and analyses.

Project description:BackgroundStudies of agreement examine the distance between readings made by different devices or observers measuring the same quantity. If the values generated by each device are close together most of the time then we conclude that the devices agree. Several different agreement methods have been described in the literature, in the linear mixed modelling framework, for use when there are time-matched repeated measurements within subjects.MethodsWe provide a tutorial to help guide practitioners when choosing among different methods of assessing agreement based on a linear mixed model assumption. We illustrate the use of five methods in a head-to-head comparison using real data from a study involving Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients and matched repeated respiratory rate observations. The methods used were the concordance correlation coefficient, limits of agreement, total deviation index, coverage probability, and coefficient of individual agreement.ResultsThe five methods generated similar conclusions about the agreement between devices in the COPD example; however, some methods emphasized different aspects of the between-device comparison, and the interpretation was clearer for some methods compared to others.ConclusionsFive different methods used to assess agreement have been compared in the same setting to facilitate understanding and encourage the use of multiple agreement methods in practice. Although there are similarities between the methods, each method has its own strengths and weaknesses which are important for researchers to be aware of. We suggest that researchers consider using the coverage probability method alongside a graphical display of the raw data in method comparison studies. In the case of disagreement between devices, it is important to look beyond the overall summary agreement indices and consider the underlying causes. Summarising the data graphically and examining model parameters can both help with this.