Dataset Information

Resting metabolic rate and its adjustments as predictors of risk protein-energy wasting in hemodialysis patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The purpose of the present study was to explore the association between resting metabolic rate (RMR) and protein-energy wasting (PEW) risk in Chinese hemodialysis patients by age and gender subgroup.

Methods

RMR and body composition (body cell mass (BCM) and fat mass) of 774 patients undergoing hemodialysis were estimated by bio-electrical impedance analysis (BIA). Anthropometric data were collected by a standard measurement protocol, and the upper arm muscle circumference (AMC) was calculated. Biochemical nutritional and dialysis parameters were obtained. Linear regression analysis was used to analyze the relationship among RMR, body composition and nutritional factors.

Results

The mean age was 54.96 ± 15.78 years. RMR level in patients was 1463.0 (1240.5, 1669.0) kcal/d. In multiple linear regression models, BCM, left calf circumference (LCC), fat mass were the determinants association with RMR (P<0.001). Among the patients in the sample, 133 (17.2%) had been diagnosed with PEW per International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism (ISRNM) criteria and 363 (46.9%) were being at risk PEW. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of RMR for predicting risk PEW was greater than RMR/BCM and RMR/body surface area (BSA). When the cutoff of RMR was 1481 kcal/d it had the higher sensitivity and specificity (82 and 42%), and the AUC was 0.68 in elderly maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients (P<0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders, lowest RMR quartile level (<1239) increased the risk of PEW (OR = 4.71, 95% CI: 1.33-16.64, P=0.016) in all patients.

Conclusions

Older patients with PEW have a lower RMR reduction. RMR and RMR/BCM may play the role in objective screening to detect risk PEW in MHD patients, especially in males.

SUBMITTER: Da J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8150161 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Muscle wasting, low protein intake, hypoalbuminemia, low body mass, and chronic fatigue are prevalent in hemodialysis patients. Impaired creatine status may be an often overlooked, potential contributor to these symptoms. However, little is known about creatine homeostasis in hemodialysis patients. We aimed to elucidate creatine homeostasis in hemodialysis patients by assessing intradialytic plasma changes as well as intra- and interdialytic losses of arginine, guanidinoacetate, creatine and creatinine. Additionally, we investigated associations of plasma creatine concentrations with low muscle mass, low protein intake, hypoalbuminemia, low body mass index, and chronic fatigue. Arginine, guanidinoacetate, creatine and creatinine were measured in plasma, dialysate, and urinary samples of 59 hemodialysis patients. Mean age was 65 ± 15 years and 63% were male. During hemodialysis, plasma concentrations of arginine (77 ± 22 to 60 ± 19 μmol/L), guanidinoacetate (1.8 ± 0.6 to 1.0 ± 0.3 μmol/L), creatine (26 [16-41] to 21 [15-30] μmol/L) and creatinine (689 ± 207 to 257 ± 92 μmol/L) decreased (all P < 0.001). During a hemodialysis session, patients lost 1939 ± 871 μmol arginine, 37 ± 20 μmol guanidinoacetate, 719 [399-1070] μmol creatine and 15.5 ± 8.4 mmol creatinine. In sex-adjusted models, lower plasma creatine was associated with a higher odds of low muscle mass (OR per halving: 2.00 [1.05-4.14]; P = 0.04), low protein intake (OR: 2.13 [1.17-4.27]; P = 0.02), hypoalbuminemia (OR: 3.13 [1.46-8.02]; P = 0.008) and severe fatigue (OR: 3.20 [1.52-8.05]; P = 0.006). After adjustment for potential confounders, these associations remained materially unchanged. Creatine is iatrogenically removed during hemodialysis and lower plasma creatine concentrations were associated with higher odds of low muscle mass, low protein intake, hypoalbuminemia, and severe fatigue, indicating a potential role for creatine supplementation.

Project description:Background and aimProtein-energy wasting (PEW) is critically associated with the reduced quality of life and poor prognosis of hemodialysis patients. However, the diagnosis criteria of PEW are complex, characterized by difficulty in estimating dietary intake and assessing muscle mass loss objectively. We performed a cross-sectional study in hemodialysis patients to propose a novel PEW prediction model.Materials and methodsA total of 380 patients who underwent maintenance hemodialysis were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The data were analyzed with univariate and multivariable logistic regression to identify influencing factors of PEW. The PEW prediction model was presented as a nomogram by using the results of logistic regression. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to test the prediction and discrimination ability of the novel model.ResultsBinary logistic regression was used to identify four independent influencing factors, namely, sex (P = 0.03), triglycerides (P = 0.009), vitamin D (P = 0.029), and NT-proBNP (P = 0.029). The nomogram was applied to display the value of each influencing factor contributed to PEW. Then, we built a novel prediction model of PEW (model 3) by combining these four independent variables with part of the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism (ISRNM) diagnostic criteria including albumin, total cholesterol, and BMI, while the ISRNM diagnostic criteria served as model 1 and model 2. ROC analysis of model 3 showed that the area under the curve was 0.851 (95%CI: 0.799-0.904), and there was no significant difference between model 3 and model 1 or model 2 (all P > 0.05). DCA revealed that the novel prediction model resulted in clinical net benefit as well as the other two models.ConclusionIn this research, we proposed a novel PEW prediction model, which could effectively identify PEW in hemodialysis patients and was more convenient and objective than traditional diagnostic criteria.

Project description:Background: Muscle wasting, observed in patients with end-stage kidney disease and protein energy wasting (PEW), is associated with increased mortality for those on hemodialysis (HD). Oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) and nutrition counseling (NC) are treatment options for PEW but research targeting muscle status, as an outcome metric, is limited. Aim: We compared the effects of combined treatment (ONS + NC) vs. NC alone on muscle status and nutritional parameters in HD patients with PEW. Methods: This multi-center randomized, open label-controlled trial, registered under ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier no. NCT04789031), recruited 56 HD patients identified with PEW using the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism criteria. Patients were randomly allocated to intervention (ONS + NC, n = 29) and control (NC, n = 27) groups. The ONS + NC received commercial renal-specific ONS providing 475 kcal and 21.7 g of protein daily for 6 months. Both groups also received standard NC during the study period. Differences in quadriceps muscle status assessed using ultrasound (US) imaging, arm muscle area and circumference, bio-impedance spectroscopy (BIS), and handgrip strength (HGS) methods were analyzed using the generalized linear model for repeated measures. Results: Muscle indices as per US metrics indicated significance (p < 0.001) for group × time interaction only in the ONS + NC group, with increases by 8.3 and 7.7% for quadriceps muscle thickness and 4.5% for cross-sectional area (all p < 0.05). This effect was not observed for arm muscle area and circumference, BIS metrics and HGS in both the groups. ONS + NC compared to NC demonstrated increased dry weight (p = 0.039), mid-thigh girth (p = 0.004), serum prealbumin (p = 0.005), normalized protein catabolic rate (p = 0.025), and dietary intakes (p < 0.001), along with lower malnutrition-inflammation score (MIS) (p = 0.041). At the end of the study, lesser patients in the ONS + NC group were diagnosed with PEW (24.1%, p = 0.008) as they had achieved dietary adequacy with ONS provision. Conclusion: Combination of ONS with NC was effective in treating PEW and contributed to a gain in the muscle status as assessed by the US, suggesting that the treatment for PEW requires nutritional optimization via ONS.