Dataset Information

Does Trypsin Oral Spray (Viruprotect^®/ColdZyme^®) Protect against COVID-19 and Common Colds or Induce Mutation? Caveats in Medical Device Regulations in the European Union.

ABSTRACT:

Background

nasal or oral sprays are often marketed as medical devices (MDs) in the European Union to prevent common cold (CC), with ColdZyme^®/Viruprotect^® (trypsin/glycerol) mouth spray claiming to prevent colds and the COVID-19 virus from infecting host cells and to shorten/reduce CC symptoms as an example. We analyzed the published (pre)-clinical evidence.

Methods

preclinical: comparison of in vitro tests with validated host cell models to determine viral infectivity. Clinical: efficacy, proportion of users protected against virus (compared with non-users) and safety associated with trypsin/glycerol.

Results

preclinical data showed that exogenous trypsin enhances SARS-CoV-2 infectivity and syncytia formation in host models, while culture passages in trypsin presence induce spike protein mutants. The manufacturer claims >98% SARS-CoV-2 deactivation, although clinically irrelevant as based on a tryptic viral digest, inserting trypsin inactivation before host cells exposure. Efficacy and safety were not adequately addressed in clinical studies or leaflets (no COVID-19 data). Protection was obtained among 9-39% of users, comparable to or lower than placebo-treated or non-users. Several potential safety risks (tissue digestion, bronchoconstriction) were identified.

Conclusions

the current European MD regulations may result in insufficient exploration of (pre)clinical proof of action. Exogenous trypsin exposure even raises concerns (higher SARS-CoV-2 infectivity, mutations), whereas its clinical protective performance against respiratory viruses as published remains poor and substandard.

SUBMITTER: Huijghebaert S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8150360 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionAn easy-to-use, multiuse, single-patient, electromechanical autoinjector, the SMARTCLIC®/CLICWISE® injection device, was recently developed to improve the self-administration options available to patients with chronic inflammatory disease treated with biologic agents. An extensive series of studies were conducted to guide the design and development of this device and to ensure its safety and effectiveness.MethodsParticipants in two user preference studies and three formative human factor (HF) studies evaluated evolving iterations of the autoinjector device, dose dispenser cartridge, graphical user interface, and informational materials; participants in a summative HF test subsequently assessed the final proposed commercially representative product. In the user preference studies, rheumatologists and patients with chronic inflammatory disease, interviewed online and in-person, provided feedback on the design and functionality of four prototypes. In the HF studies, the safety, effectiveness, and usability of adapted prototypes were assessed under simulated-use conditions by patients with chronic inflammatory disease, caregivers, and healthcare professionals (HCPs). The safety and effectiveness of the final refined device and system were confirmed in a summative HF test by patients and HCPs in simulated-use scenarios.ResultsRheumatologists (n = 204) and patients (n = 39) interviewed in the two user preference studies provided feedback on the device size, feature ergonomics, and usability that guided prototype development in the subsequent formative HF studies. Observations from patients, caregivers, and HCPs (n = 55) participating in the latter studies yielded additional critical design revisions that culminated in development of the final device and system. Of 106 injection simulations conducted in the summative HF test, all resulted in successful medication delivery, and no potential harms were associated with injection-related use events.ConclusionFindings from this research facilitated development of the SmartClic/ClicWise autoinjector device and demonstrated that it could be used safely and effectively by participants representative of the intended-use population of patients, lay caregivers, and HCPs.

Project description:IntroductionEnbrel® (etanercept: manufactured by Immunex Corporation, Newbury Park, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320, USA) was the first biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Europe. More recently, an etanercept biosimilar (Benepali®: manufactured by Biogen Inc, Cambridge, MA 02124, USA) was approved in the European Union. The perceptions and preferences of the Benepali autoinjector versus Enbrel MYCLIC autoinjector were evaluated by nurses from Europe.MethodsThe survey involved a 25-min face-to-face questionnaire-interview with nurses from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK, experienced in training patients on using the Enbrel MYCLIC autoinjector. Nurses viewed an instructional video and device-handling leaflet, received a live demonstration on the Benepali autoinjector and had access to both Benepali and Enbrel MYCLIC training autoinjectors. Nurses rated the importance of ten autoinjector attributes on a scale of 1-7 (1 = not important at all; 7 = extremely important) and provided their autoinjector preferences based on specific attributes. Nurses also gave their opinion on which autoinjector their patients with RA would prefer.ResultsA total of 149 nurses participated in this survey (France, n = 30; Germany, n = 40; Italy, n = 30; Spain, n = 19; UK, n = 30). 'Easy to operate the self-injection' was ranked as the most important attribute (mean score of 6.8), followed by 'easy to grip' (6.6) and 'intuitive/self-explaining usage' (6.6). Nurses preferred the Benepali autoinjector, with attributes of 'easier to operate' and 'more intuitive to use' being strong differentiators compared with the Enbrel MYCLIC autoinjector. Most nurses (86%) reported that their patients would prefer the Benepali autoinjector over the Enbrel MYCLIC autoinjector. 'Easy to operate the self-injection' and 'button-free autoinjector' were key drivers when selecting an autoinjector.ConclusionBased on these survey results, nurses in Europe reported a preference for the Benepali autoinjector compared with the Enbrel MYCLIC autoinjector for the majority of attributes assessed. In particular, attributes of 'easy to operate' and 'more intuitive/self-explaining to use' were highly rated for the Benepali autoinjector, which may allow easy handling of the autoinjector.FundingBiogen International GmBH.

Project description:BackgroundHeart failure patients are frequently on coagulation-active medications before LVAD implantation and perioperative bleeding is a frequent complication after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The role of point-of-care coagulation tests in assessing bleeding risk for LVAD implantation and the early postoperative time course of these tests is not well established.MethodsWe prospectively enrolled 25 patients with terminal heart failure undergoing LVAD implantation. Study related TRAP-, ASPI- and ADP- tests of Multiplate® platelet aggregometry, ROTEM® rotational thromboelastometry (INTEM, EXTEM, FIBTEM), thrombin generation assay and conventional laboratory studies were measured at 11 predefined time-points during the first 21 postoperative days. We examined if preoperative TRAP-, ASPI-, ADP- and ROTEM values are correlated with estimated total blood loss (primary outcome parameter) during the first 21 days after LVAD implantation and compared the baseline values of these measurements between patients with a bleeding event to those without. We performed Spearman's correlation and non-parametric tests for paired and non-paired comparisons.Results7 out of 25 (28%) patients experienced a bleeding event of which 4 required surgical revision. Of the preoperatively performed measurements the TRAP test [Spearman's Rho (ρ) = -0.5, p = 0.01], INTEM CFT (ρ = 0.72, p < 0.001), INTEM alpha (-0.7, p < 0.001), EXTEM MCF (ρ = -0.63; p < 0.001), EXTEM alpha (ρ = -0.67; p < 0.001), FIBTEM MCF (ρ = -0.41; p = 0.042), Fibrinogen (Clauss) (ρ = -0.5; p = 0.011), Anti-thrombin activity (ρ = -0.49; p = 0.013) and platelet count (ρ = -0.42; p = 0.034) were significantly correlated to total blood loss. Patients undergoing a surgical bleeding revision had significantly reduced values in TRAP-[31.5 IQR (17.25-43.5U) vs. 69 IQR (52.5-87U); p = 0.004], ASPI-[16.5 IQR (5.5-35.7U) vs. 39 IQR (24.5-62.5U); p = 0.038], ADP-[30 IQR (22-69U) vs. 12.5 IQR (8.7-21.5U); p = 0.01], EXTEM MCF-[63 IQR (57.7-63.7) vs. 67 IQR (65-75.5); p = 0.019] and EXTEM alpha [74 IQR (68.75-74) vs. 79 IQR (78-80.5); p = 0.002] values before LVAD implantation.ConclusionMultiplate® and ROTEM® measurements before LVAD implantation may identify LVAD candidates with platelet dysfunction and alterations of the primary hemostasis and could guide anesthetists and intensive care practitioners in bleeding risk stratification and in the perioperative clinical management.

Project description:Phenolics enriched pomegranate fruit (Pomella®) and red maple leaf (Maplifa®) extracts and their major phenolic constituents have demonstrated beneficial skin effects through the protection of human skin keratinocytes from oxidative-stress-induced damage. However, their mechanisms of protection of cutaneous collagen are still unclear. Herein, the collagen protective effects of Pomella® and Maplifa®, and their major bioactive phytochemicals, namely, punicalagin (PA) and ginnalin A (GA), respectively, were evaluated using enzymatic assays including collagenase, anti-glycation and cell-based models as well as computational methods. The importance of the modulatory effects was validated at the protein level for type I collagen and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) using human-skin-derived keratinocytes. The synergistic collagenase inhibitory effects upon combinations of Pomella® + Maplifa® and PA + GA at a combination ratio of 1:2 and 1:1, respectively, were evaluated using their combination index (CI; a well-established assessment of synergism). Pomella® (50-400 µg/mL), Maplifa® (100-800 µg/mL), PA (50-400 µM), and GA (50-400 µM) dose-dependently inhibited collagenase activity by 26.3-86.3%, 25.7-94.0%, 26.2-94.0%, and 12.0-98.0%, respectively. The CI of the anti-collagenase activity of Pomella® and Maplifa® ranged from 0.53-0.90, while that of PA and GA (12.5/12.5 and 25/25 µM) ranged from 0.66 and 0.69, respectively, suggesting a synergistic inhibitory effect. Interestingly, in the cell-based assays by Western blotting, Pomella® and Maplifa® reduced the protein expression levels of collagen degradation enzymes (MMPs), while simultaneously increasing that of type I collagen in epidermoid carcinoma A431 cells. This is the first report to show that these extracts exert synergistic collagen protective effects. Taken together, these findings provide molecular insights into the usefulness of Pomella® and Maplifa® or their phenolics as bioactive ingredients for skin care products to slow down aging and enhance skin tone.

Dataset Information

Does Trypsin Oral Spray (Viruprotect^®/ColdZyme^®) Protect against COVID-19 and Common Colds or Induce Mutation? Caveats in Medical Device Regulations in the European Union.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Dataset Information

Does Trypsin Oral Spray (Viruprotect®/ColdZyme®) Protect against COVID-19 and Common Colds or Induce Mutation? Caveats in Medical Device Regulations in the European Union.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets

Does Trypsin Oral Spray (Viruprotect^®/ColdZyme^®) Protect against COVID-19 and Common Colds or Induce Mutation? Caveats in Medical Device Regulations in the European Union.