Dataset Information

Additional Value of PET/CT-Based Radiomics to Metabolic Parameters in Diagnosing Lynch Syndrome and Predicting PD1 Expression in Endometrial Carcinoma.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

We aim to compare the radiomic features and parameters on 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) between patients with endometrial cancer with Lynch syndrome and those with endometrial cancer without Lynch syndrome. We also hope to explore the biologic significance of selected radiomic features.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study, first using the 18F-FDG PET/CT images and clinical data from 100 patients with endometrial cancer to construct a training group (70 patients) and a test group (30 patients). The metabolic parameters and radiomic features of each tumor were compared between patients with and without Lynch syndrome. An independent cohort of 23 patients with solid tumors was used to evaluate the value of selected radiomic features in predicting the expression of the programmed cell death 1 (PD1), using 18F-FDG PET/CT images and RNA-seq genomic data.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in the standardized uptake values on PET between patients with endometrial cancer with Lynch syndrome and those with endometrial cancer without Lynch syndrome. However, there were significant differences between the 2 groups in metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis (p < 0.005). There was a difference in the radiomic feature of gray level co-occurrence matrix entropy (GLCMEntropy; p < 0.001) between the groups: the area under the curve was 0.94 in the training group (sensitivity, 82.86%; specificity, 97.14%) and 0.893 in the test group (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 93.33%). In the independent cohort of 23 patients, differences in GLCMEntropy were related to the expression of PD1 (r_s =0.577; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In patients with endometrial cancer, higher metabolic tumor volumes, total lesion glycolysis values, and GLCMEntropy values on 18F-FDG PET/CT could suggest a higher risk for Lynch syndrome. The radiomic feature of GLCMEntropy for tumors is a potential predictor of PD1 expression.

SUBMITTER: Wang X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8152935 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe study retrospectively analyzed the accuracy and predictive ability of preoperative integrated whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT for the assessment of high-risk factors in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC).Materials and methodsA total of 205 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent preoperative PET/CT at Shanghai General Hospital from January 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated and last follow-up was June 2023. Our study evaluated the ability and optimal cutoff values of three metabolic and volumetric parameters-standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)-to predict deep myometrial invasion (DMI), endocervical stroma invasion (ESI) and lymph node metastases (LNM) in endometrial cancer. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of PET/CT were used to assess the diagnostic performance for the prediction.ResultsOur study demonstrated a significant relationship between SUVmax (11.29, 17.38, 9.47), SUVmean (5.20, 6.12, 4.49), MTV (38.15, 36.28, 33.79 ml), and TLG (199.30, 225.10, 156.40 g) on PET/CT and histologically confirmed DMI, ESI and LNM in endometrial carcinoma (EC), with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 100%/100%/100%, 96.53%/98.89%/87.14%, 97.56%/99.02%/91.22%, 92.42%/92.85%/78.31%, and 100%/100%/100%, respectively. Our study showed a risk model based on optimal cutoff values for MTV and TLG of 19.6 ml/126.3 g, 20.54 ml/84.80 g and 24 ml/49.83 g to preoperatively predict DMI, ESI, and LNM, respectively, in endometrial carcinoma. The 4-year OS (HR) for Stage IA, IB, II, III and IV according to 2009 FIGO was 98.00% (0.22), 95.20% (0.04), 83.90% (0.18), 90.50% (0.09) and 60% (0.51). Accordingly, estimated 4-year DFS (HR) for the stage IA-III was 98% (0.02), 95.20% (0.05), 76.90% (0.27) and 76.30% (0.35), all the patients in stage IV occurred recurrence and progression.ConclusionThe present study showed patients with MTV > = 19.6 ml of MI and PET- positive LN with MTV cutoff > = 24 ml tended to predict poor OS and PFS in endometrial carcinoma. The cutoff of MTV and TLG in PET/CT assessment could be an independent prognostic factors to predict aggressive forms of EC.

Project description:Diagnosing relapse after radiotherapy for lung cancer is challenging. The specificity of both CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT is low because of radiation-induced changes. 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) PET has previously demonstrated higher specificity for malignancy than 18F-FDG PET. We investigated the value of 18F-FLT PET/CT for diagnosing relapse in irradiated lung cancer. Methods: Patients suspected of relapse of lung cancer after definitive radiotherapy (conventional fractionated radiotherapy [cRT] or stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT]) were included. Sensitivity and specificity were analyzed both within the irradiated high-dose volume (HDV) and on a patient basis. Marginal differences and interobserver agreement were assessed. Results: Sixty-three patients who had received radiotherapy in 70 HDVs (34 cRT; 36 SBRT) were included. The specificity of 18F-FLT PET/CT was higher than that of 18F-FDG PET/CT (HDV, 96% [95% CI, 87-100] vs. 71% [95% CI, 57-83] [P = 0.0039]; patient-based, 90% [95% CI, 73-98] vs. 55% [95% CI, 36-74] [P = 0.0020]). The difference in specificity between 18F-FLT PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT was higher after cRT than after SBRT. The sensitivity of 18F-FLT PET/CT was lower than that of 18F-FDG PET/CT (HDV, 69% [95% CI, 41-89] vs. 94% [95% CI, 70-100] [P = 0.1250]; patient-based, 70% [95% CI, 51-84] vs. 94% [95% CI, 80-99] [P = 0.0078]). Adding 18F-FLT PET/CT when 18F-FDG PET/CT was positive or inconclusive improved the diagnostic value compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT alone. In cRT HDVs, the probability of malignancy increased from 67% for 18F-FDG PET/CT alone to 100% when both tracers were positive. Conclusion: 18F-FLT PET/CT adds diagnostic value to 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected relapse. The diagnostic impact of 18F-FLT PET/CT was highest after cRT. We suggest adding 18F-FLT PET/CT when 18F-FDG PET/CT is inconclusive or positive within the previously irradiated volume to improve diagnostic value in patients for whom histologic confirmation is not easily obtained.