Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

15 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Correction: Martinez-Fernandez et al. Seasonal and Nutrient Supplement Responses in Rumen Microbiota Structure and Metabolites of Tropical Rangeland Cattle. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1550.

ABSTRACT: We have found one inadvertent error in our paper published in Microorganisms [...].

SUBMITTER: Martinez-Fernandez G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8153255 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Seasonal and Nutrient Supplement Responses in Rumen Microbiota Structure and Metabolites of Tropical Rangeland Cattle.

Project description:This study aimed to characterize the rumen microbiota structure of cattle grazing in tropical rangelands throughout seasons and their responses in rumen ecology and productivity to a N-based supplement during the dry season. Twenty pregnant heifers grazing during the dry season of northern Australia were allocated to either N-supplemented or un-supplemented diets and monitored through the seasons. Rumen fluid, blood, and feces were analyzed before supplementation (mid-dry season), after two months supplementation (late-dry season), and post supplementation (wet season). Supplementation increased average daily weight gain (ADWG), rumen NH3-N, branched fatty acids, butyrate and acetic:propionic ratio, and decreased plasma δ15N. The supplement promoted bacterial populations involved in hemicellulose and pectin degradation and ammonia assimilation: Bacteroidales BS11, Cyanobacteria, and Prevotella spp. During the dry season, fibrolytic populations were promoted: the bacteria Fibrobacter, Cyanobacteria and Kiritimatiellaeota groups; the fungi Cyllamyces; and the protozoa Ostracodinium. The wet season increased the abundances of rumen protozoa and fungi populations, with increases of bacterial families Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Muribaculaceae; the protozoa Entodinium and Eudiplodinium; the fungi Pecoramyces; and the archaea Methanosphera. In conclusion, the rumen microbiota of cattle grazing in a tropical grassland is distinctive from published studies that mainly describe ruminants consuming better quality diets.

| S-EPMC7600044 | biostudies-literature

Reply to Soman et al, Alffenaar et al, Metcalfe et al, and Raoult.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC4696596 | biostudies-literature

Cryobiopsy Compared with Surgical Lung Biopsy in ILD: Reply to Maldonado et al., Froidure et al., Bendstrup et al., Agarwal et al., Richeldi et al., Rajchgot et al., and Quadrelli et al.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6812448 | biostudies-literature

Reply to Topeli et al. and to Akinosoglou et al.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7328319 | biostudies-literature

Reply to Gueret et al. and to Hammond et al.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7193864 | biostudies-literature

Reply to Turnbull et al. and to Hulme et al.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7068835 | biostudies-literature

S080_BrCaRes_Schneeweiss et al.

Project description:In patients with primary breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus pemetrexed followed by docetaxel (AP-D) is associated with a pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 16.5%, and doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (AC-D) is associated with a pCR rate of 20.2%. Our primary objective was to identify single predictive genetic markers for achievement of pCR following either AP-D or AC-D treatment. Our main secondary objective was to detect treatment-group specific, pCR-predictive gene signatures.

2014-02-01 | E-TABM-1186 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Brezillon et al.

Project description:Comparison of EPC (Endothelial progenitor) versus MSC (Mensenchymal stem) at the transcriptomics level

2013-01-16 | E-MEXP-3071 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Roerr et al CGH data

Project description:Comparative genomic hybridization experiments comparing DNA from experimentally evolved yeast strains to DNA from a euploid control.

2022-12-08 | GSE220549 | GEO

Reply by Xu et al. to Haouzi et al.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7427385 | biostudies-literature