Dataset Information

16S rRNA Monitoring Point-of-Care Magnetic Focus Lateral Flow Sensor.

ABSTRACT: The detection and profiling of pathogenic bacteria is critical for human health, environmental, and food safety monitoring. Herein, we propose a highly sensitive colorimetric strategy for naked eye screening of 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) from pathogenic agents relevant to infections, human health, and food safety monitoring with a magnetic focus lateral flow sensor (mLFS) platform. The method developed was demonstrated in model 16S rRNA sequences of the pathogen Escherichia coli O157:H7 to detect as low as 1 fM of targets, exhibiting a sensitivity improved by ∼5 × 10⁵ times compared to the conventional GNP-based colorimetric lateral flow assay used for oligonucleotide testing. Based on the grayscale values, semi-quantitation of up to 1 pM of target sequences was possible in ∼45 min. The methodology could detect the target 16S rRNA from as low as 32 pg/mL of total RNA extracted from pathogens. Specificity was demonstrated with total RNA extracted from E. coli K-12 MG1655, Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa). No signal was observed from as high as 320 pg/mL of total RNA from the nontarget bacteria. The recognition of target 16S rRNA from 32 pg/mL of total RNA in complex matrices was also demonstrated. The proposed mLFS method was then extended to monitoring B. subtilis and P. aeruginosa. Our approach highlights the possibility of extending this concept to screen specific nucleic acid sequences for the monitoring of infectious pathogens or microbiome implicated in a range of diseases including cancer.

SUBMITTER: Ren W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8153928 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAs vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are now being rolled out, a better understanding of immunity to the virus, whether from infection, or passive or active immunisation, and the durability of this protection is required. This will benefit from the ability to measure antibody-based protection to SARS-CoV-2, ideally with rapid turnaround and without the need for laboratory-based testing.MethodsWe have developed a lateral flow POC test that can measure levels of RBD-ACE2 neutralising antibody (NAb) from whole blood, with a result that can be determined by eye or quantitatively on a small instrument. We compared our lateral flow test with the gold-standard microneutralisation assay, using samples from convalescent and vaccinated donors, as well as immunised macaques.FindingsWe show a high correlation between our lateral flow test with conventional neutralisation and that this test is applicable with animal samples. We also show that this assay is readily adaptable to test for protection to newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants, including the beta variant which revealed a marked reduction in NAb activity. Lastly, using a cohort of vaccinated humans, we demonstrate that our whole-blood test correlates closely with microneutralisation assay data (specificity 100% and sensitivity 96% at a microneutralisation cutoff of 1:40) and that fingerprick whole blood samples are sufficient for this test.InterpretationTaken together, the COVID-19 NAb-testTM device described here provides a rapid readout of NAb based protection to SARS-CoV-2 at the point of care.FundingSupport was received from the Victorian Operational Infrastructure Support Program and the Australian Government Department of Health. This work was supported by grants from the Department of Health and Human Services of the Victorian State Government; the ARC (CE140100011, CE140100036), the NHMRC (1113293, 2002317 and 1116530), and Medical Research Future Fund Awards (2005544, 2002073, 2002132). Individual researchers were supported by an NHMRC Emerging Leadership Level 1 Investigator Grants (1194036), NHMRC APPRISE Research Fellowship (1116530), NHMRC Leadership Investigator Grant (1173871), NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship (1137285), NHMRC Investigator Grants (1177174 and 1174555) and NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowships (1117766 and 1136322). Grateful support was also received from the A2 Milk Company and the Jack Ma Foundation.

Project description:ObjectiveThere is a lack of evidence addressing several important human factors questions pertaining to the quality of supportive information provided by commercial manufacturers that can affect the adoption and use of lateral flow serology assays in practice. We aimed to: (1) identify and assess the quality of information that commercial manufacturers provided for their point-of-care tests (POCTs) and (2) examine the implications of these findings on real-world settings.DesignWe used a content analysis methodology in two stages to systematically, code and analyse textual data from documents of commercial manufacturers. A deductive approach was applied using a coding guide based on the validated Point-of-Care Key Evidence Tool (POCKET) multidimensional checklist. An inductive approach was used to identify new patterns or themes generated from our textual analysis.SettingPublicly available supportive information documents by commercial manufacturers for lateral flow serology, were identified and gathered from online searches.ParticipantsSupportive information documents retrieved from online searches over 3 months (March 2020 to June 2020).ResultsA total of 79 POCTs were identified that met the study inclusion criteria. Using the POCKET coding guide, we found that the quality of information varied significantly between the manufacturers and was often lacking in detail. Our inductive approach further examined these topics and found that several statements were vague and that significant variations in the level of details existed between manufacturers.ConclusionsThis study revealed significant concerns surrounding the supportive information reported by manufacturers for lateral flow serology assays. Information transparency was poor and human factor issues were not properly addressed to mitigate the risk of improper device use, although it should be noted that the results of our study are limited by the data that manufactures were prepared to disclose. Overall, commercial manufacturers should improve the quality and value of information presented in their supporting documentation.

Project description:BackgroundDiagnosis of Neisseria (N.) gonorrhoeae is dependent on nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), which is not available in resource-limited settings where the prevalence of infection is highest. Recent advances in molecular diagnostics leveraging the high specificity of CRISPR enzymes can permit field-deployable, point-of-care lateral flow assays. We previously reported on the development and in vitro performance of a lateral flow assay for detecting N. gonorrhoeae. Here we aimed to pair that assay with point-of-care DNA extraction techniques and assess the performance on clinical urine specimens.MethodsWe collected an additional urine specimen among individuals enrolling in an ongoing clinical trial at the Massachusetts General Hospital Sexual Health Clinic who presented with symptoms of urethritis or cervicitis (urethral or vaginal discharge, dysuria, or dyspareunia). We then assessed thermal, detergent, and combination DNA extraction conditions, varying the duration of heat at 95°C and concentration of Triton X. We assessed the efficacy of the various DNA extraction methods by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Once an extraction method was selected, we incubated samples for 90 minutes to permit isothermal recombinase polymerase amplification. We then assessed the performance of lateral flow Cas13a-based detection using our previously designed porA probe and primer system for N. gonorrhoeae detection, comparing lateral flow results with NAAT results from clinical care.ResultsWe assessed DNA extraction conditions on 3 clinical urine specimens. There was no consistent significant difference in copies per microliter of DNA obtained using more or less heat. On average, we noted that 0.02% triton combined with 5 minutes of heating to 95°C resulted in the highest DNA yield, however, 0.02% triton alone resulted in a quantity of DNA that was above the previously determined analytic sensitivity of the assay. Given that detergent-based extraction is more easily deployable, we selected that as our method for extraction. We treated 23 clinical specimens with 0.02% triton, which we added to the Cas13a detection system. We ran all lateral flow detections in duplicate. The Cas13a-based assay detected 8 of 8 (100%) positive specimens, and 0 of 15 negative specimens.ConclusionUsing point-of-care DNA extraction, isothermal amplification, and Cas13a-based detection, our point-of-care lateral flow N. gonorrhoeae assay correctly identified 23 clinical urine specimens as either positive or negative. Further evaluation of this assay among larger samples and more diverse sample types is warranted.

Dataset Information

16S rRNA Monitoring Point-of-Care Magnetic Focus Lateral Flow Sensor.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets