Dataset Information

A Mixed-chimerism Protocol Utilizing Thymoglobulin and Belatacept Did Not Induce Lung Allograft Tolerance, Despite Previous Success in Renal Allotransplantation.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In kidney transplantation, long-term allograft acceptance in cynomolgus macaques was achieved using a mixed-chimerism protocol based on the clinically available reagents, rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), and belatacept. Here, we have tested the same protocol in cynomolgus macaques transplanted with fully allogeneic lung grafts.

Methods

Five cynomolgus macaques underwent left orthotopic lung transplantation. Initial immunosuppression included equine ATG and anti-IL6RmAb induction, followed by triple-drug immunosuppression for 4 mo. Post-transplant, a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen was applied, including total body and thymic irradiation. Rabbit ATG, belatacept, anti-IL6RmAb, and donor bone marrow transplantation (DBMT) were given, in addition to a 28-d course of cyclosporine. All immunosuppressant drugs were stopped on day 29 after DBMT.

Results

One monkey rejected its lung before DBMT due to AMR, after developing donor-specific antibodies. Two monkeys developed fatal post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, and both monkeys had signs of cellular rejection in their allografts upon autopsy. The remaining 2 monkeys showed severe cellular rejection on days 42 and 70 post-DBMT. Cytokine analysis suggested higher levels of pro-inflammatory markers in the lung transplant cohort, as compared to kidney recipients.

Conclusion

Although the clinically applicable protocol showed success in kidney transplantation, the study did not show long-term survival in a lung transplant model, highlighting the organ-specific differences in tolerance induction.

SUBMITTER: Sommer W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8154498 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMycophenolic acid (MPA) is widely used as part of immunosuppressive regimens following allograft transplantation. The large pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) variability and narrow therapeutic range of MPA provide a potential for therapeutic drug monitoring. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the MPA PK and PD relation in combination with belatacept (2nd generation CTLA4-Ig) or cyclosporine (CsA).MethodsSeven renal allograft recipients were randomized to either belatacept (n = 4) or cyclosporine (n = 3) based immunosuppression. Samples for MPA PK and PD evaluations were collected predose and at 1, 2 and 13 weeks posttransplant. Plasma concentrations of MPA were determined by HPLC-UV. Activity of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) and the expressions of two IMPDH isoforms were measured in CD4+ cells by HPLC-UV and real-time reverse-transcription PCR, respectively. Subsets of T cells were characterized by flow cytometry.ResultsThe MPA exposure tended to be higher among belatacept patients than in CsA patients at week 1 (P = 0.057). Further, MPA concentrations (AUC0-9 h and C0) increased with time in both groups and were higher at week 13 than at week 2 (P = 0.031, n = 6). In contrast to the postdose reductions of IMPDH activity observed early posttransplant, IMPDH activity within both treatment groups was elevated throughout the dosing interval at week 13. Transient postdose increments were also observed for IMPDH1 expression, starting at week 1. Higher MPA exposure was associated with larger elevations of IMPDH1 (r = 0.81, P = 0.023, n = 7 for MPA and IMPDH1 AUC0-9 h at week 1). The maximum IMPDH1 expression was 52 (13-177)% higher at week 13 compared to week 1 (P = 0.031, n = 6). One patient showed lower MPA exposure with time and did neither display elevations of IMPDH activity nor IMPDH1 expression. No difference was observed in T cell subsets between treatment groups.ConclusionThe significant influence of MPA on IMPDH1 expression, possibly mediated through reduced guanine nucleotide levels, could explain the elevations of IMPDH activity within dosing intervals at week 13. The present regulation of IMPDH in CD4+ cells should be considered when interpreting measurements of IMPDH inhibition.