Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Electrostatics does not dictate the slip-stacked arrangement of aromatic π-π interactions.


ABSTRACT: Benzene dimer has long been an archetype for π-stacking. According to the Hunter-Sanders model, quadrupolar electrostatics favors an edge-to-face CH⋯π geometry but competes with London dispersion that favors cofacial π-stacking, with a compromise "slip-stacked" structure emerging as the minimum-energy geometry. This model is based on classical electrostatics, however, and neglects charge penetration. A fully quantum-mechanical analysis, presented here, demonstrates that electrostatics actually exerts very little influence on the conformational landscape of (C6H6)2. Electrostatics also cannot explain the slip-stacked arrangement of C6H6⋯C6F6, where the sign of the quadrupolar interaction is reversed. Instead, the slip-stacked geometry emerges in both systems due to competition between dispersion and Pauli repulsion, with electrostatics as an ambivalent spectator. This revised interpretation helps to rationalize the persistence of offset π-stacking in larger polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and across the highly varied electrostatic environments that characterize π-π interactions in proteins.

SUBMITTER: Carter-Fenk K 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8159364 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3670127 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7615044 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3461201 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9298890 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6856858 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3523751 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5890429 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8293984 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5309697 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8604681 | biostudies-literature