Dataset Information

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics to Predict Peritoneal Metastasis in Gastric Cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To develop and validate a dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) derived radiomics model to predict peritoneal metastasis (PM) in patients with gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

This retrospective study recruited 239 GC (non-PM = 174, PM = 65) patients with histopathological confirmation for peritoneal status from January 2015 to December 2019. All patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 160) and a testing cohort (n = 79). Standardized iodine-uptake (IU) images and 120-kV-equivalent mixed images (simulating conventional CT images) from portal-venous and delayed phases were used for analysis. Two regions of interest (ROIs) including the peritoneal area and the primary tumor were independently delineated. Subsequently, 1691 and 1226 radiomics features were extracted from the peritoneal area and the primary tumor from IU and mixed images on each phase. Boruta and Spearman correlation analysis were used for feature selection. Three radiomics models were established, including the R_IU model for IU images, the R_MIX model for mixed images and the combined radiomics model (the R_comb model). Random forest was used to tune the optimal radiomics model. The performance of the clinical model and human experts to assess PM was also recorded.

Results

Fourteen and three radiomics features with low redundancy and high importance were extracted from the IU and mixed images, respectively. The R_IU model showed significantly better performance to predict PM than the R_MIX model in the training cohort (AUC, 0.981 vs. 0.917, p = 0.034). No improvement was observed in the R_comb model (AUC = 0.967). The R_IU model was the optimal radiomics model which showed no overfitting in the testing cohort (AUC = 0.967, p = 0.528). The R_IU model demonstrated significantly higher predictive value on peritoneal status than the clinical model and human experts in the testing cohort (AUC, 0.785, p = 0.005; AUC, 0.732, p <0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

DECT derived radiomics could serve as a non-invasive and easy-to-use biomarker to preoperatively predict PM for GC, providing opportunity for those patients to tailor appropriate treatment.

SUBMITTER: Chen Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8160383 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceNeoadjuvant therapies have been shown to decrease tumor burden, increase resection rate, and improve the outcomes among patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, not all patients are equally responsive; therefore, differentiating potential respondents from nonrespondents is clinically important.ObjectiveTo use pretreatment computed tomography (CT)-pixelated feature-difference extraction techniques to identify diagnostically relevant features that could predict patients' response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy at diagnosis.Design, setting, and participantsThis multicenter cohort study included patients with locally advanced GC who were treated from January 2010 to July 2017 at 2 hospitals in southern China (training cohort) and 1 hospital in northern China (external validation cohort). Their clinicopathological data, pretreatment CT images, and pathological reports were retrieved and analyzed. Data analysis was conducted from December 2017 to May 2021.ExposuresAll patients underwent 2 to 4 cycles of fluorouracil in combination with a platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. All gastrectomies were performed according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (14th edition) guidelines.Main outcomes and measuresReliability of clinicopathological and radiomics-based features were assessed with area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Mann-Whitney U test.ResultsA total of 323 patients (242 [74.9%] men; median [range] age, 58 [24-82] years) were included in the study, with 250 patients (77.4%) in the training cohort and 73 (22.6%) in the validation cohort. The baseline pretreatment characteristics of the training and validation cohorts were well-balanced. The number of respondents in the training and validation cohort was 122 (48.8%) and 40 (54.8%), respectively, and the number of nonrespondents was 128 (51.2%) and 33 (45.2%), respectively. No clinicopathological variables were significantly associated with treatment response. Using radiomics, 20 low-intercorrelated features from a total of 7477 features were used to construct a radiomics signature that demonstrated significant association with treatment response. Good discrimination performance of the radiomics signature for predicting treatment response in the training (AUC, 0.736; 95% CI, 0.675-0.798) and external validation (AUC, 0.679; 95% CI, 0.554-0.803) cohorts was observed. Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical utility of the radiomics signature.Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, the proposed radiomics signature showed potential as a clinical aid for predicting the response of patients with locally advanced GC before treatment, thereby allowing timely planning for effective treatments for potential nonrespondents.

Project description:Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the value of radiomics analysis of iodine-based material decomposition (MD) images with dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) imaging for preoperatively predicting microsatellite instability (MSI) status in colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: This study included 102 CRC patients proved by postoperative pathology, and their MSI status was confirmed by immunohistochemistry staining. All patients underwent preoperative DECT imaging scanned on either a Revolution CT or Discovery CT 750HD scanner, and the iodine-based MD images in the venous phase were reconstructed. The clinical, CT-reported, and radiomics features were obtained and analyzed. Data from the Revolution CT scanner were used to establish a radiomics model to predict MSI status (70% samples were randomly selected as the training set, and the remaining samples were used to validate); and data from the Discovery CT 750HD scanner were used to test the radiomics model. The stable radiomics features with both inter-user and intra-user stability were selected for the next analysis. The feature dimension reduction was performed by using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test, Spearman's rank correlation test, min-max standardization, one-hot encoding, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator selection method. The multiparameter logistic regression model was established to predict MSI status. The model performances were evaluated: The discrimination performance was accessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis; the calibration performance was tested by calibration curve accompanied by Hosmer-Lemeshow test; the clinical utility was assessed by decision curve analysis. Results: Nine top-ranked features were finally selected to construct the radiomics model. In the training set, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.961 (accuracy: 0.875; sensitivity: 1.000; specificity: 0.812); in the validation set, the AUC was 0.918 (accuracy: 0.875; sensitivity: 0.875; specificity: 0.857). In the testing set, the diagnostic performance was slightly lower with AUC of 0.875 (accuracy: 0.788; sensitivity: 0.909; specificity: 0.727). A nomogram based on clinical factors and radiomics score was generated via the proposed logistic regression model. Good calibration and clinical utility were observed using the calibration and decision curve analyses, respectively. Conclusion: Radiomics analysis of iodine-based MD images with DECT imaging holds great potential to predict MSI status in CRC patients.

Project description:In the present study, we aimed to construct a radiomics model using contrast‑enhanced computed tomography (CT) to predict the pathological invasiveness of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs). We retrospectively reviewed the records of 179 consecutive patients (89 females) with histologically confirmed TETs from two hospitals. The 82 low‑ and 97 high‑risk TETs were assigned to training (90 tumors), internal validation (49 tumors) and external validation (40 tumors) cohorts. Radiomics features extracted from preoperative contrast‑enhanced chest CT were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression. Three prediction models were developed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Their performance and clinical utility were assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and the DeLong test, respectively. Eight radiomics features with non‑zero coefficients were used to develop a radiomics score, which significantly differed between low‑ and high‑risk TETs (P<0.001). The subjective finding, infiltration, was independently associated with high‑risk TETs. Prediction models based on infiltration alone, the radiomics signature alone, and both these parameters showed diagnostic accuracies of 72.2% [area under curve (AUC), 0.731; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.627‑0.819; sensitivity, 85.7%; specificity, 60.4%], 88.9% (AUC, 0.944; 95% CI: 0.874‑0.981; sensitivity, 92.9%; specificity, 85.4%), and 90.0% (AUC, 0.953; 95% CI: 0.887‑0.987; sensitivity, 92.9%; specificity, 87.5%), respectively. Decision‑curve analysis showed that the combined model added more net benefit than the single‑parameter models. In conclusion, a radiomics signature based on contrast‑enhanced CT has the potential to differentiate between low‑ and high‑risk TETs. The model incorporating the radiomics signature and subjective finding may facilitate the individualized, preoperative prediction of the pathological invasiveness of TETs.

Project description:Rationale: Given the rapid spread of COVID-19, an updated risk-stratify prognostic tool could help clinicians identify the high-risk patients with worse prognoses. We aimed to develop a non-invasive and easy-to-use prognostic signature by chest CT to individually predict poor outcome (death, need for mechanical ventilation, or intensive care unit admission) in patients with COVID-19.Methods: From November 29, 2019 to February 19, 2020, a total of 492 patients with COVID-19 from four centers were retrospectively collected. Since different durations from symptom onsets to the first CT scanning might affect the prognostic model, we designated the 492 patients into two groups: 1) the early-phase group: CT scans were performed within one week after symptom onset (0-6 days, n = 317); and 2) the late-phase group: CT scans were performed one week later after symptom onset (?7 days, n = 175). In each group, we divided patients into the primary cohort (n = 212 in the early-phase group, n = 139 in the late-phase group) and the external independent validation cohort (n = 105 in the early-phase group, n = 36 in the late-phase group) according to the centers. We built two separate radiomics models in the two patient groups. Firstly, we proposed an automatic segmentation method to extract lung volume for radiomics feature extraction. Secondly, we applied several image preprocessing procedures to increase the reproducibility of the radiomics features: 1) applied a low-pass Gaussian filter before voxel resampling to prevent aliasing; 2) conducted ComBat to harmonize radiomics features per scanner; 3) tested the stability of the features in the radiomics signature by several image transformations, such as rotating, translating, and growing/shrinking. Thirdly, we used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) to build the radiomics signature (RadScore). Afterward, we conducted a Fine-Gray competing risk regression to build the clinical model and the clinic-radiomics signature (CrrScore). Finally, performances of the three prognostic signatures (clinical model, RadScore, and CrrScore) were estimated from the two aspects: 1) cumulative poor outcome probability prediction; 2) 28-day poor outcome prediction. We also did stratified analyses to explore the potential association between the CrrScore and the poor outcomes regarding different age, type, and comorbidity subgroups.Results: In the early-phase group, the CrrScore showed the best performance in estimating poor outcome (C-index = 0.850), and predicting the probability of 28-day poor outcome (AUC = 0.862). In the late-phase group, the RadScore alone achieved similar performance to the CrrScore in predicting poor outcome (C-index = 0.885), and 28-day poor outcome probability (AUC = 0.976). Moreover, the RadScore in both groups successfully stratified patients with COVID-19 into low- or high-RadScore groups with significantly different survival time in the training and validation cohorts (all P < 0.05). The CrrScore in both groups can also significantly stratify patients with different prognoses regarding different age, type, and comorbidities subgroups in the combined cohorts (all P < 0.05).Conclusions: This research proposed a non-invasive and quantitative prognostic tool for predicting poor outcome in patients with COVID-19 based on CT imaging. Taking the insufficient medical recourse into account, our study might suggest that the chest CT radiomics signature of COVID-19 is more effective and ideal to predict poor outcome in the late-phase COVID-19 patients. For the early-phase patients, integrating radiomics signature with clinical risk factors can achieve a more accurate prediction of individual poor prognostic outcome, which enables appropriate management and surveillance of COVID-19.