Dataset Information

Efficacy and safety of oral tolvaptan in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a Phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Loop diuretics are used to manage fluid retention in patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis (HD). This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, in Japanese HD patients.

Methods

A total of 124 patients (24-h urine volume ≥500 mL) on thrice-weekly HD were randomized to receive oral tolvaptan 15 mg/day (n = 40), tolvaptan 30 mg/day (n = 40) or placebo (n = 44) for 24 weeks. Efficacy endpoints were change from baseline in 24-h urine volume, total fluid removal by HD per week and interdialytic weight gain (IDWG). Safety was assessed via the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

Results

At treatment end, the difference (95% confidence interval) from the placebo group in the mean change from baseline in 24-h urine volume was significant in the tolvaptan 15 mg {429.1 mL [95% confidence interval (CI) 231.0, 627.2]; P < 0.0001} and 30 mg [371.6 mL (95% CI 144.1, 599.2); P = 0.0017] groups. The mean changes from baseline in total fluid removal by HD and IDWG were not significantly different in the tolvaptan groups versus the placebo group. Although the proportion of patients with TEAEs was lower in the placebo group (77.3%) than in the tolvaptan groups (92.3%), tolvaptan was safe and well-tolerated during the study period.

Conclusions

Tolvaptan significantly sustained diuretic action for 24 weeks in HD patients but did not reduce total fluid removal by HD per week and IDWG to the same extent.

SUBMITTER: Ogata H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8160953 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:PQ912 is an inhibitor of the glutaminyl cyclase enzyme that plays a central role in the formation of synaptotoxic pyroglutamate-A-beta oligomers. We report on the first clinical study with PQ912 in subjects with biomarker-proven Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aim was to determine the maximal tolerated dose, target occupancy and treatment-related pharmacodynamic effects. The exploratory efficacy readouts selected were tailored to the patient population with early AD. The therapeutic approach focuses on synaptic dysfunction as captured by various measures such as electroencephalography (EEG), synaptic biomarkers and sensitive cognitive tests. METHODS:This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of PQ912 800 mg twice daily (bid) for 12 weeks in subjects with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to AD. The 120 enrolled subjects were treatment-naïve at the start of the study, had confirmed AD biomarkers in their cerebrospinal fluid at screening and had a Mini Mental State Examination score between 21 and 30. After 1 week of treatment with 400 mg bid, patients were up-titrated to 800 mg bid for 11 weeks. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either PQ912 or placebo. The primary composite endpoints were to assess safety and tolerability based on the number of patients who discontinued due to (serious) adverse events (safety), and based on dose adjustment during the treatment period and/or nonadherence to randomized treatment (tolerability). All randomized subjects who took at least one dose of the study treatment or placebo were used for safety analyses. RESULTS:There was no significant difference between treatments in the number of subjects with (serious) adverse events, although there were slightly more patients with a serious adverse event in the PQ912 group compared to placebo. More subjects treated with PQ912 discontinued treatment due to adverse events, mostly related to gastrointestinal and skin/subcutaneous tissue disorders. PQ912 treatment resulted in a significant reduction in glutaminyl cyclase activity, which resulted in an average target occupancy of >?90%. A significant reduction of theta power in the EEG frequency analysis and a significant improvement in the One Back test of our Neuropsychological Test Battery was observed. The exploratory biomarker readouts, neurogranin for synaptic toxicity and YKL-40 as a marker of inflammation, appear to be sensitive enough to serve as efficacy markers in the next phase 2b study. CONCLUSIONS:The maximal tolerated dose of PQ912 has been identified and the results support future studies at still lower doses reaching >?50% target occupancy, a longer up-titration phase to potentially induce adaptation and longer treatment periods to confirm the early signals of efficacy as seen in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION:Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT 02389413 . Registered on 17 March 2015.

Project description:BackgroundNon-antiviral therapeutic options are required for the treatment of hospitalised patients with COVID-19. CD24Fc is an immunomodulator with potential to reduce the exaggerated inflammatory response to tissue injuries. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CD24Fc in hospitalised adults with COVID-19 receiving oxygen support.MethodsWe conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study at nine medical centres in the USA. Hospitalised patients (age ≥18 years) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who were receiving oxygen support and standard of care were randomly assigned (1:1) by site-stratified block randomisation to receive a single intravenous infusion of CD24Fc 480 mg or placebo. The study funder, investigators, and patients were masked to treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was time to clinical improvement over 28 days, defined as time that elapsed between a baseline National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ordinal scale score of 2-4 and reaching a score of 5 or higher or hospital discharge. The prespecified primary interim analysis was done when 146 participants reached the time to clinical improvement endpoint. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04317040.FindingsBetween April 24 and Sept 22, 2020, 243 hospitalised patients were assessed for eligibility and 234 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive CD24Fc (n=116) or placebo (n=118). The prespecified interim analysis was done when 146 participants reached the time to clinical improvement endpoint among 197 randomised participants. In the interim analysis, the 28-day clinical improvement rate was 82% (81 of 99) for CD24Fc versus 66% (65 of 98) for placebo; median time to clinical improvement was 6·0 days (95% CI 5·0-8·0) in the CD24Fc group versus 10·0 days (7·0-15·0) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·61, 95% CI 1·16-2·23; log-rank p=0·0028, which crossed the prespecified efficacy boundary [α=0·0147]). 37 participants were randomly assigned after the interim analysis data cutoff date; among the 234 randomised participants, median time to clinical improvement was 6·0 days (95% CI 5·0-9·0) in the CD24Fc group versus 10·5 days (7·0-15·0) in the placebo group (HR 1·40, 95% CI 1·02-1·92; log-rank p=0·037). The proportion of participants with disease progression within 28 days was 19% (22 of 116) in the CD24Fc group versus 31% (36 of 118) in the placebo group (HR 0·56, 95% CI 0·33-0·95; unadjusted p=0·031). The incidences of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in both groups. No treatment-related adverse events were observed.InterpretationCD24Fc is generally well tolerated and accelerates clinical improvement of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who are receiving oxygen support. These data suggest that targeting inflammation in response to tissue injuries might provide a therapeutic option for patients hospitalised with COVID-19.FundingMerck & Co, National Cancer Institute, OncoImmune.

Project description:ObjectiveVoclosporin, a novel calcineurin inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with lupus nephritis (LN), improved complete renal response rates in patients with LN in a phase 2 trial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of voclosporin for the treatment of LN.MethodsThis multicenter, double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial was done in 142 hospitals and clinics across 27 countries. Patients with a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus and LN, according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria, who had undergone a kidney biopsy within 2 years that showed class III, IV, or V (alone or in combination with class III or IV) were eligible for this study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral voclosporin (23.7 mg twice daily) or a placebo, on a background of mycophenolate mofetil (1 g twice daily) and rapidly tapered low-dose oral steroids, by use of an interactive web response system. The primary endpoint was complete renal response at 52 weeks, defined as a composite of urine protein creatinine ratio of 0.5 mg/mg or less, stable renal function (defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥60 ml/min/1.73m2 or no confirmed decrease from baseline in eGFR of > 20%), no administration of rescue medication, and no more than 10 mg prednisone equivalent per day for 3 or more consecutive days or 7 or more days during Week 44 through Week 52 (just before the primary endpoint assessment). Safety was also assessed. Efficacy analysis was by intention to treat, and safety analysis was by randomized patients receiving at least one dose of study treatment.ResultsBetween April 13, 2017, and October 10, 2019, 179 patients were assigned to the voclosporin group and 178 were assigned to the placebo group. The primary endpoint of complete renal response at Week 52 was achieved in significantly more patients in the voclosporin group than in the placebo group (73 [41%] of 179 patients vs 40 [23%] of 178 patients; odds ratio, 2.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-4.27; P < 0·0001). The adverse event profile was balanced between the two groups; serious adverse events occurred in 37 (21%) of 178 patients in the voclosporin group and 38 (21%) of 178 patients in the placebo group. The most frequent serious adverse event involving infection was pneumonia, occurring in seven (4%) patients in the voclosporin group and in eight (4%) patients in the placebo group. A total of six patients died during the study or study follow-up period (one [<1%] patient in the voclosporin group and five [3%] patients in the placebo group). None of the events leading to death were considered by the investigators to be related to the study treatments.ConclusionVoclosporin in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and low-dose steroids led to a clinically and statistically superior complete renal response rate versus MMF and low-dose steroids alone, with a comparable safety profile. This finding is an important advancement in the treatment of patients with active LN.