Dataset Information

Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test.

ABSTRACT: Individual differences in understanding other people's emotions have typically been studied with recognition tests using prototypical emotional expressions. These tests have been criticized for the use of posed, prototypical displays, raising the question of whether such tests tell us anything about the ability to understand spontaneous, non-prototypical emotional expressions. Here, we employ the Emotional Accuracy Test (EAT), which uses natural emotional expressions and defines the recognition as the match between the emotion ratings of a target and a perceiver. In two preregistered studies (N_total = 231), we compared the performance on the EAT with two well-established tests of emotion recognition ability: the Geneva Emotion Recognition Test (GERT) and the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET). We found significant overlap (r > 0.20) between individuals' performance in recognizing spontaneous emotions in naturalistic settings (EAT) and posed (or enacted) non-verbal measures of emotion recognition (GERT, RMET), even when controlling for individual differences in verbal IQ. On average, however, participants reported enjoying the EAT more than the other tasks. Thus, the current research provides a proof-of-concept validation of the EAT as a useful measure for testing the understanding of others' emotions, a crucial feature of emotional intelligence. Further, our findings indicate that emotion recognition tests using prototypical expressions are valid proxies for measuring the understanding of others' emotions in more realistic everyday contexts.

SUBMITTER: Israelashvili J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8162550 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:It is commonly assumed that a person's emotional state can be readily inferred from his or her facial movements, typically called emotional expressions or facial expressions. This assumption influences legal judgments, policy decisions, national security protocols, and educational practices; guides the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illness, as well as the development of commercial applications; and pervades everyday social interactions as well as research in other scientific fields such as artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and computer vision. In this article, we survey examples of this widespread assumption, which we refer to as the common view, and we then examine the scientific evidence that tests this view, focusing on the six most popular emotion categories used by consumers of emotion research: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. The available scientific evidence suggests that people do sometimes smile when happy, frown when sad, scowl when angry, and so on, as proposed by the common view, more than what would be expected by chance. Yet how people communicate anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise varies substantially across cultures, situations, and even across people within a single situation. Furthermore, similar configurations of facial movements variably express instances of more than one emotion category. In fact, a given configuration of facial movements, such as a scowl, often communicates something other than an emotional state. Scientists agree that facial movements convey a range of information and are important for social communication, emotional or otherwise. But our review suggests an urgent need for research that examines how people actually move their faces to express emotions and other social information in the variety of contexts that make up everyday life, as well as careful study of the mechanisms by which people perceive instances of emotion in one another. We make specific research recommendations that will yield a more valid picture of how people move their faces to express emotions and how they infer emotional meaning from facial movements in situations of everyday life. This research is crucial to provide consumers of emotion research with the translational information they require.

Project description:Speech Emotion Recognition (SER) identifies and categorizes emotional states by analyzing speech signals. SER is an emerging research area using machine learning and deep learning techniques due to its socio-cultural and business importance. An appropriate dataset is an important resource for SER related studies in a particular language. There is an apparent lack of SER datasets in Bangla language although it is one of the most spoken languages in the world. There are a few Bangla SER datasets but those consist of only a few dialogs with a minimal number of actors making them unsuitable for real-world applications. Moreover, the existing datasets do not consider the intensity level of emotions. The intensity of a specific emotional expression, such as anger or sadness, plays a crucial role in social behavior. Therefore, a realistic Bangla speech dataset is developed in this study which is called KUET Bangla Emotional Speech (KBES) dataset. The dataset consists of 900 audio signals (i.e., speech dialogs) from 35 actors (20 females and 15 males) with diverse age ranges. Source of the speech dialogs are Bangla Telefilm, Drama, TV Series, Web Series. There are five emotional categories: Neutral, Happy, Sad, Angry, and Disgust. Except Neutral, samples of a particular emotion are divided into two intensity levels: Low and High. The significant issue of the dataset is that the speech dialogs are almost unique with relatively large number of actors; whereas, existing datasets (such as SUBESCO and BanglaSER) contain samples with repeatedly spoken of a few pre-defined dialogs by a few actors/research volunteers in the laboratory environment. Finally, the KBES dataset is exposed as a nine-class problem to classify emotions into nine categories: Neutral, Happy (Low), Happy (High), Sad (Low), Sad (High), Angry (Low), Angry (High), Disgust (Low) and Disgust (High). However, the dataset is kept symmetrical containing 100 samples for each of the nine classes; 100 samples are also gender balanced with 50 samples for male/female actors. The developed dataset seems a realistic dataset while compared with the existing SER datasets.

Dataset Information

Emotion Recognition from Realistic Dynamic Emotional Expressions Cohere with Established Emotion Recognition Tests: A Proof-of-Concept Validation of the Emotional Accuracy Test.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets