Dataset Information

Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: Systematic review and meta-analyses.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of early rehabilitation compared with delayed/standard rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair for pain, function, range of movement, strength, and repair integrity.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analyses.

Methods

We searched databases and included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early with delayed/standard rehabilitation for patients undergoing rotator cuff repair surgery. We assessed risk of bias of the RCTs using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool.

Results

Twenty RCTs, with 1841 patients, were included. The majority of the RCTs were of high or unclear risk of overall bias. We found substantial variations in the rehabilitation programmes, time in the sling and timing of exercise progression. We found no statistically significant differences for pain and function at any follow-up except for the outcome measure Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation at six months (MD: 6.54; 95%CI: 2.24-10.84) in favour of early rehabilitation. We found statistically significant differences in favour of early rehabilitation for shoulder flexion at six weeks (MD: 7.36; 95%CI: 2.66-12.06), three (MD: 8.45; 95%CI: 3.43-13.47) and six months (MD: 3.57; 95%CI: 0.81-6.32) and one year (MD: 1.42; 95%CI: 0.21-2.64) and similar differences for other planes of movement. In terms of repair integrity, early mobilisation does not seem to increase the risk of re-tears (OR:1.05; 95%CI: 0.64-1.75).

Discussion

Current approaches to early mobilisation, based largely on early introduction of passive movement, did not demonstrate significant differences in most clinical outcomes, although we found statistically significant differences in favour of early rehabilitation for range of movement. Importantly, there were no differences in repair integrity between early and delayed/standard rehabilitation. Most rehabilitation programmes did not consider early active movement as soon as the patient feels able. With ongoing variation in rehabilitation protocols there remains a need for large high quality RCT to inform the optimal approach to rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair surgery.

SUBMITTER: Mazuquin B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8162656 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Rotator cuff tears are a common cause for pain and reduced function. Tears of the tendons of the cuff can be a result of a degenerative process or as a consequence of trauma. Management of cuff tears are surrounded by controversy from indications for surgical management to rehabilitation protocol post-surgical repair. The aim of post surgical rehabilitation is to improve functional outcome, reduce pain and promote tendon healing. In the case of rotator cuff repair, rehabilitation can be broadly divided into early passive range of motion (EPM) and delayed range of motion (DRM). The EPM regime is defined by minimal immobilisation of the shoulder and passive mobilisation of the joint within the first post-operative period. In contrast, DRM immobilises the shoulder joint up to six weeks post-operatively. Proponents of EPM state various advantages of their rehabilitation protocol including improved range of motion and earlier return to normal activities of daily living. However, there has also been concern that this rehabilitation regime may result in an increased rate of re-rupture. Since this is a highly controversial issue, various high quality literature have been published looking to clarify which regime is best following rotator cuff surgery. Reviewing these articles, it appears that there is an increase rate of re-tear of the repaired rotator cuff tendon when the EPM regime is employed. Statistical significance however was limited by small sample sizes. Range of motion post-repair also appears to be associated with post-operative rehabilitation regime. As expected, the EPM regime has been shown to improve range of motion post-repair. Despite this, literature reports patients managed with the DPM showed a statistically better patient reported outcome measure. We conclude that based on the evidence we currently have, early range of motion post rotator cuff repair is related with an increase risk of re-tear. The DPM regime reduces this risk with the possible complication of reduced range of shoulder movement. This problem is thought to be an easier clinical issue to deal with compared to re-rupture of the repaired rotator cuff tendon. There is however lack of data to achieve statistical significance in most of these analysis. There is a definite need for a large, multi-centre single blinded randomised controlled trial to further shed light on this controversial topic.

Project description:Introduction: Post-operative rehabilitation following rotator cuff tear repair (RCR) is important to promote tendon healing, restore strength, and recover normal function. Aquatic therapy in hot water allows body relaxation, which promotes patient conditioning for efficient rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to assess whether aquatic therapy is more efficient than standard (land-based) rehabilitation in terms of range of motion (ROM), function, and pain after arthroscopic RCR. Methods: We prospectively randomized 86 patients scheduled for arthroscopic RCR to either aquatic therapy (n = 44) or standard rehabilitation (n = 42) using block sizes of four or six. Patients were evaluated clinically at 1.5, 3, 6, and 24 months and using ultrasound (US) at 6 months. Two-way mixed ANOVA tests were performed to evaluate the effects of rehabilitation type (between-subjects factor) on ROM and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) over time (within-subjects factor). Post-hoc inter-group comparisons at each time point were also conducted using Wilcoxon rank sum tests or unpaired Student t-tests and adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni correction. Results: The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of demographic data or pre-operative characteristics, except for the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, which was lower in the aquatic therapy group (37.9 ± 23.6 vs. 55.6 ± 24.9, p = 0.019). The mixed model revealed the absence of interaction effect between the type of rehabilitation and time on PROMs and ROM except on the SANE score (p < 0.001), which was biased by the existing pre-operative difference mentioned above. Furthermore, none of the post-operative outcomes were statistically different between the two groups at 1.5, 3, 6, and 24 months. In addition, no significant difference could be noted regarding tendon healing rate (p = 0.443), complication (p = 0.349), workstop duration (0.585), or patient satisfaction (p = 0.663). Conclusion: Compared to the standard rehabilitation, the aquatic therapy did not yield superior clinical and functional outcomes after arthroscopic RCR when started immediately after the surgery.