Dataset Information

Swallowing-related neural oscillation: an intracranial EEG study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Swallowing is a unique movement due to the indispensable orchestration of voluntary and involuntary movements. The transition from voluntary to involuntary swallowing is executed within milliseconds. We hypothesized that the underlying neural mechanism of swallowing would be revealed by high-frequency cortical activities.

Methods

Eight epileptic participants fitted with intracranial electrodes over the orofacial cortex were asked to swallow a water bolus and cortical oscillatory changes, including the high γ band (75-150 Hz) and β band (13-30 Hz), were investigated at the time of mouth opening, water injection, and swallowing.

Results

Increases in high γ power associated with mouth opening were observed in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) with water injection in the lateral central sulcus and with swallowing in the region along the Sylvian fissure. Mouth opening induced a decrease in β power, which continued until the completion of swallowing. The high γ burst of activity was focal and specific to swallowing; however, the β activities were extensive and not specific to swallowing. In the interim between voluntary and involuntary swallowing, swallowing-related high γ power achieved its peak, and subsequently, the power decreased.

Interpretation

We demonstrated three distinct activities related to mouth opening, water injection, and swallowing induced at different timings using high γ activities. The peak of high γ power related to swallowing suggests that during voluntary swallowing phases, the cortex is the main driving force for swallowing as opposed to the brain stem.

SUBMITTER: Hashimoto H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8164860 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) has been the mainstay of identifying the seizure onset zone (SOZ), a key diagnostic procedure in addition to neuroimaging when considering epilepsy surgery. In many patients, iEEG has been the basis for resective epilepsy surgery, to date still the most successful treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. Intracranial EEG determines the location and resectability of the SOZ. Advances in recording and implantation of iEEG provide multiple options in the 21st century. This not only includes the choice between subdural electrodes (SDE) and stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) but also includes the implantation and recordings from microelectrodes. Before iEEG implantation, especially in magnetic resonance imaging -negative epilepsy, a clear hypothesis for seizure generation and propagation should be based on noninvasive methods. Intracranial EEG implantation should be planned by a multidisciplinary team considering epileptic networks. Recordings from SDE and SEEG have both their advantages and disadvantages. Stereo-EEG seems to have a lower rate of complications that are clinically significant, but has limitations in spatial sampling of the cortical surface. Stereo-EEG can sample deeper areas of the brain including deep sulci and hard to reach areas such as the insula. To determine the epileptogenic zone, interictal and ictal information should be taken into consideration. Interictal spiking, low frequency slowing, as well as high frequency oscillations may inform about the epileptogenic zone. Ictally, high frequency onsets in the beta/gamma range are usually associated with the SOZ, but specialized recordings with combined macro and microelectrodes may in the future educate us about onset in higher frequency bands. Stimulation of intracranial electrodes triggering habitual seizures can assist in identifying the SOZ. Advanced computational methods such as determining the epileptogenicity index and similar measures may enhance standard clinical interpretation. Improved techniques to record and interpret iEEG may in the future lead to a greater proportion of patients being seizure free after epilepsy surgery.

Project description:EEG source imaging is becoming widely used for the evaluation of medically refractory focal epilepsy. The validity of EEG source imaging has been established in several studies comparing source imaging to the surgical resection cavity and subsequent seizure freedom. We present a cohort of 87 patients and compare EEG source imaging of both ictal and interictal scalp EEG to the seizure onset zone on intracranial EEG. Concordance of EEG source imaging with intracranial EEG was determined on a sublobar level and was quantified by measuring the distance between the source imaging result and the centroid of the active seizure onset zone electrodes. The EEG source imaging results of a subgroup of 26 patients with high density 76-channel EEG were compared with the localization of three experienced epileptologists. Of 87 patients, 95% had at least one analysis concordant with intracranial EEG and 74% had complete concordance. There was a higher rate of complete concordance in temporal lobe epilepsy compared to extratemporal (89.3 and 62.8%, respectively, P = 0.015). Of the total 282 analyses performed on this cohort, higher concordance was also seen in temporal discharges (95%) compared to extratemporal (77%) (P = 0.0012), but no difference was seen comparing high-density EEG with standard (32-channel) EEG. Subgroup analysis of ictal waveforms showed greater concordance for ictal spiking, compared with rhythmic activity, paroxysmal fast activity, or obscured onset. Median distances from the dipole and maximum distributed source to a centroid of seizure onset zone electrodes were 30.0 and 32.5 mm, respectively, and the median distances from dipole and maximum distributed source to nearest seizure onset zone electrode were 22.8 and 21.7, respectively. There were significantly shorter distances in ictal spiking. There were shorter distances in patients with Engel Class 1 outcome from surgical resection compared to patients with worse outcomes. For the subgroup of 26 high-density EEG patients, EEG source localization had a significantly higher concordance (92% versus 65%), sensitivity (57% versus 35%) and positive predictive value (60% versus 36%) compared with epileptologist localization. Our study demonstrates good concordance between ictal and interictal source imaging and intracranial EEG. Temporal lobe discharges have higher concordance rates than extratemporal discharges. Importantly, this study shows that source imaging has greater agreement with intracranial EEG than visual review alone, supporting its role in surgical planning.