Dataset Information

Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma after HCV eradication: Determining the role of portal hypertension by measuring spleen stiffness.

ABSTRACT:

Background & aims

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) reduces but does not eliminate the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The development of surveillance strategies for HCC after the sustained virologic response (SVR) is therefore warranted. We aimed to evaluate the role of spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) in the prediction of HCC risk in a cohort of patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) treated with DAAs.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of 140 patients with HCV-related ACLD successfully treated with DAAs in our centre between 2015 and 2017. Patients with available liver stiffness (LSM) and SSM before treatment and 6 months after (SVR24) were included. A Cox regression model investigated the association between SSM and HCC development.

Results

During a median follow-up of 41.5 (IQR 32-49) months, 20 patients presented with HCC. SSM at SVR24 predicted HCC development in univariate and adjusted multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 1.025; 95% CI: 1.001-1.050); the best cut-off was 42 kPa. Patients with LSM-SVR24 ≤10 kPa were at the lowest risk of HCC. In patients with LSM-SVR24 >10 kPa, HCC incidence was not further influenced by LSM values (10-20 kPa vs. >20 kPa), but only by SSM-SVR24 values (≤42 vs. >42 kPa).

Conclusions

Portal hypertension, as evaluated by SSM, plays a significant role in liver carcinogenesis after DAA treatment. We proposed a new algorithm based on post-treatment values of LSM and SSM for the stratification of HCC risk after SVR achievement.

Lay summary

Spleen stiffness predicts the development of hepatocellular carcinoma after viral eradication, especially in patients with post-treatment liver stiffness values >10 kPa. An algorithm based on liver and spleen stiffness can stratify for the risk of liver cancer development and guide the surveillance strategies after treatment with direct-acting antivirals.

SUBMITTER: Dajti E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8165428 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background & aimsClinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is a landmark in the natural history of cirrhosis, influencing clinical decisions in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Previous small series suggested that splanchnic volume measurements may predict portal hypertension. We aimed to evaluate whether volumetry obtained by standard multidetector computerised tomography (MDCT) can predict CSPH in patients with HCC.MethodsWe included 175 patients with HCC, referred for hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) evaluation, in whom contemporary MDCT was available. Liver volume, spleen volume (SV) and liver segmental volume ratio (LSVR: volume of the segments I-III/volume of the segments IV-VIII) were calculated semi-automatically from MDCT. Other non-invasive tests (NITs) were also employed.ResultsVolume parameters could be measured in almost 100% of cases with an excellent inter-observer agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.950). SV and LSVR were independently associated with CSPH (HVPG ≥10 mmHg) and did not interact with aetiology. The volume Index (VI), calculated as the product of SV and LSVR, predicted CSPH (AUC 0.83; 95% CI 0.77-0.89). Similar results were observed in an external cohort (n = 23) (AUC 0.87; 95% CI 0.69-1.00). Setting a sensitivity and specificity of 98%, VI could have avoided 35.9% of HVPG measurements. The accuracy of VI was similar to that of other NITs. VI also accurately predicted HVPG greater than 12, 14, 16 and 18 mmHg (AUC 0.81 [95% CI 0.74-0.88], 0.84 [95% CI 0.77-0.91], 0.85 [95% CI 0.77-0.92] and 0.87 [95% CI 0.79-0.94], respectively).ConclusionsQuantification of liver and spleen volumes by MDCT is a simple, accurate and reliable method of CSPH estimation in patients with compensated cirrhosis and HCC.Impact and implicationsAn increase in portal pressure strongly impacts outcomes after surgery in patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Direct measurement through hepatic vein catheterization remains the reference standard for portal pressure assessment, but its invasiveness limits its application. Therefore, we evaluated the ability of CT scan-based liver and spleen volume measurements to predict portal hypertension in patients with HCC. Our results indicate that the newly described index, based on quantification of liver and spleen volume, accurately predicts portal hypertension. These results suggest that a single imaging test may be used to diagnose and stage HCC, while providing an accurate estimation of portal hypertension, thus helping to stratify surgical risks.

Project description:Background & aimsWe compare the performance of liver surface nodularity (LSN) and liver stiffness measurements (LSM) using transient elastography (TE) for the detection of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsAll patients with cirrhosis and HCC who underwent computed tomography, LSM and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements within 30 days between 2015 and 2018 were included. The estimation of CSPH by LSN and LSM, and the LSM-spleen-size-to-platelet ratio score (LSPS) were evaluated and compared.ResultsIn total, 140 patients were included (109 men [78%], mean age 63 ± 9 years old), including 39 (28%) with CSPH. LSN measurements were valid in 130 patients (93%) and significantly correlated with HVPG (r = 0.68; p <0.001). Patients with CSPH had higher LSN measurements compared with those without [3.1 ± 0.4 vs. 2.5 ± 0.3, p <0.001; area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC): 0.87 ± 0.31]. LSM and LSPS were valid in 132 patients (94%) and significantly correlated with HVPG (r = 0.75, p <0.001; AUROC 0.87 ± 0.04 and r = 0.68, p <0.001; AUROC 0.851 ± 0.04, respectively). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance between LSN and LSM-LSPS (DeLong, p = 0.28, 0.37, and 0.65, respectively) in patients with both valid tests (n = 122). LSN <2.50 had a 100% negative predictive value for CSPH. A 2-step algorithm combining LSN and LSPS for the diagnosis of CSPH classified 108/140 patients (77%) with an 8% error.ConclusionsThe diagnostic performance and feasibility of LSN measurements were similar to those of LSM for the detection of CSPH in patients with compensated cirrhosis and HCC. Combining LSN and LSPS accurately detected CSPH in >75% of patients. Such a combination could be useful in centres where the HVPG measurement is unavailable.Lay summaryThe diagnostic performance and feasibility of liver surface nodularity was similar to that of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for the detection of clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Thus, liver surface nodularity could be an option for the preoperative detection of clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Combining liver surface nodularity with LSM-spleen-size-to-platelet ratio score resulted in the accurate detection of clinically significant portal hypertension in >75% of patients, thus limiting the need for HVPG measurements.

Project description:BackgroundAssessment of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the most reliable, though invasive method for evaluation of portal hypertension. Non-invasive, elastography-based techniques are well established in diagnosis, but not in monitoring of portal hypertension. The aim of our prospective study was to determine the value of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography technique of the liver and spleen in diagnosis and monitoring of portal hypertension.MethodsWe prospectively assessed portal hypertension by HVPG and corresponding elastography of the liver and spleen in 31 patients with liver cirrhosis and an indication for primary prophylaxis by non-cardio selective beta-blockers. Investigations were performed at baseline and a follow-up visit after 6-8 weeks. To address the known large variability of values for spleen elastography, well-defined corresponding areas in the spleen were used for baseline and follow-up elastography. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC-ROC values for both spleen and liver elastography monitoring of portal hypertension were calculated.ResultsLiver but not spleen elastography significantly correlated with HVPG results and was suitable for initial evaluation of portal hypertension. However, changes in HVPG results did not show any correlation with alterations of ARFI values from baseline to follow-up visits both for liver and spleen elastography. Spleen stiffness results were not homogeneous across the whole organ differing significantly between the upper, hilar, and bottom placed investigation areas.ConclusionsIn this prospective study ARFI-based assessment of liver elastography showed itself suitable for initial assessment but not for monitoring of portal hypertension. Spleen elastography was not appropriate for both, evaluation and monitoring of portal hypertension. A possible explanation for this new data that are in some contrast to previously published results is the degree of portal hypertension in our study, a comparatively short follow-up period, and well-defined investigation areas for spleen elastography in repetitive ARFI investigations. This trial is registered with NCT03315767.

Project description:BACKGROUND & AIMS:It is unclear whether direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment-induced sustained virologic response (SVR) reduces the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with HCV infection. Therefore, in the current study, our aim was to determine the impact of DAA-induced SVR on HCC risk. METHODS:We identified 62,354 patients who initiated antiviral treatment in the Veterans Affairs (VA) national healthcare system from 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2015, including 35,871 (58%) interferon (IFN)-only regimens, 4,535 (7.2%) DAA?+?IFN regimens, and 21,948 (35%) DAA-only regimens. We retrospectively followed patients until 15 June 2017 to identify incident cases of HCC. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to determine the association between SVR and HCC risk or between type of antiviral regimen (DAA-only vs. DAA?+?IFN vs. IFN-only) and HCC risk. RESULTS:We identified 3,271 incident cases of HCC diagnosed at least 180 days after initiation of antiviral treatment during a mean follow-up of 6.1 years. The incidence of HCC was highest in patients with cirrhosis and treatment failure (3.25 per 100 patient-years), followed by cirrhosis and SVR (1.97), no cirrhosis and treatment failure (0.87), and no cirrhosis and SVR (0.24). SVR was associated with a significantly decreased risk of HCC in multivariable models irrespective of whether the antiviral treatment was DAA-only (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 0.29; 95% CI 0.23-0.37), DAA?+?IFN (AHR 0.48; 95% CI 0.32-0.73) or IFN-only (AHR 0.32; 95% CI 0.28-0.37). Receipt of a DAA-only or DAA?+?IFN regimen was not associated with increased HCC risk compared with receipt of an IFN-only regimen. CONCLUSIONS:DAA-induced SVR is associated with a 71% reduction in HCC risk. Treatment with DAAs is not associated with increased HCC risk compared with treatment with IFN. LAY SUMMARY:It was unclear whether direct-acting antiviral treatment-induced sustained virologic response reduces the risk of liver cancer in patients with HCV infection. We demonstrated that eradication of HCV infection with direct-acting antiviral agents reduces the risk of liver cancer by 71%.

Project description:BackgroundThe value of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in portal hypertension (PH) has yet to be determined in the context of chronic liver disease (CLD). This study examined the value of MRE for the prediction of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and high-risk esophageal varices (EVs) in a CLD cohort with a generally high HVPG.MethodsPatients with CLD who underwent both HVPG measurement and two-dimensional MRE examination at Beijing Friendship Hospital between April 2018 and March 2022 were prospectively included. Two-dimensional MRE was performed within the liver and spleen. Endoscopy results and laboratory parameters were collected. Some selected published serum markers were calculated, including fibrosis 4, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index, and King's score. The efficacy of the parameters for assessing PH was analyzed by using the Pearson correlation coefficient, linear and logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.ResultsA total of 48 patients were included. The mean HVPG was 16.8±5.8 mmHg. Among these patients, 47 patients had PH (HVPG >5 mmHg), and 43 patients had clinically significant PH (HVPG ≥10 mmHg). Among the parameters associated with HVPG, the strongest correlation was found for spleen stiffness (SS) (R=0.638; P<0.001). In multiple regression analyses, SS was independently associated with an elevated HVPG and high-risk EVs. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of SS for identifying patients with an HVPG ≥16 mmHg, HVPG ≥20 mmHg, and high-risk EVs were 0.790, 0.822, and 0.886, respectively, which were higher than those of liver stiffness (LS) and serum markers but slightly inferior to that of fibrosis 4 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve =0.844) in identifying an HVPG ≥16 mmHg. SS cutoff values of 9.5, 10.05, and 9.9 kPa were selected to rule out the presence of an HVPG ≥16 mmHg, HVPG ≥20 mmHg, and high-risk EVs (sensitivity: 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively; specificity: 45.5%, 50%, and 60%, respectively).ConclusionsIn patients with generally high HVPG, SS measured by two-dimensional MRE may be a better predictor of HVPG values and high-risk EVs than LS and serum markers.

Project description:Background & aimsLiver resection (LR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) defined as a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg is not encouraged. Here, we reappraised the outcomes of patients with cirrhosis and CSPH who underwent LR for HCC in highly specialised liver centres.MethodsThis was a retrospective multicentre study from 1999 to 2019. Predictors for postoperative liver decompensation and textbook outcomes were identified.ResultsIn total, 79 patients with a median age of 65 years were included. The Child-Pugh grade was A in 99% of patients, and the median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 8. The median HVPG was 12 mmHg. Major hepatectomies and laparoscopies were performed in 28% and 34% of patients, respectively. Ninety-day mortality and severe morbidity rates were 6% and 27%, respectively. Postoperative and persistent liver decompensation occurred in 35% and 10% of patients at 3 months. Predictors of liver decompensation included increased preoperative HVPG (p = 0.004), increased serum total bilirubin (p = 0.02), and open approach (p = 0.03). Of the patients, 34% achieved a textbook outcome, of which the laparoscopic approach was the sole predictor (p = 0.004). The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were 55% and 43%, respectively.ConclusionsPatients with cirrhosis, HCC and HVPG ≥10 mmHg can undergo LR with acceptable mortality, morbidity, and liver decompensation rates. The laparoscopic approach was the sole predictor of a textbook outcome.Lay summaryPatients with cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and clinically significant portal hypertension (defined as a hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mmHg) can undergo resection with acceptable mortality, morbidity, liver decompensation rates, and a textbook outcome. These results can be achieved in selected patients with preserved liver function, good general status, and sufficient remnant liver volume.

Project description:Background & aimsBoth liver stiffness (LS) and spleen stiffness (SS) are widely used to non-invasively assess liver fibrosis and portal hypertension, respectively. We aimed to identify the impact of disease etiology, namely the localization of inflammation (portal vs. lobular), on the SS/LS ratio.MethodsIn this multicenter study, LS and SS were prospectively assessed in 411 patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) using FibroScan® (Echosens, Paris); changes in these parameters were also studied in response to treatment (alcohol withdrawal, HCV therapy). LS and spleen length (SL) were further analyzed in a retrospective cohort of 449 patients with long-term data on decompensation/death.ResultsBoth, SS and SL were significantly higher in HCV compared to ALD (42.0 vs. 32.6 kPa, p≪0.0001, 15.6 vs. 11.9 cm, p≪0.0001) despite a lower mean LS in HCV. Consequently, the SS to LS ratio and the SL to LS ratio were significantly higher in HCV (3.8 vs. 1.72 and 1.46 vs. 0.86, p≪0.0001) through all fibrosis stages. Notably, SL linearly increased with SS and the relation between SS and SL was identical in HCV and ALD. In contrast, livers were much larger in ALD at comparable LS. After treatment, LS significantly decreased in both diseases without significant changes to the SS/LS ratio. In the prognostic cohort, patients with ALD had higher LS values (30.5 vs. 21.3 kPa) and predominantly presented with jaundice (65.2%); liver failure was the major cause of death (p≪0.01). In contrast, in HCV, spleens were larger (17.6 vs. 12.1 cm) while variceal bleeding was the major cause of decompensation (73.2%) and death (p≪0.001).ConclusionBoth SS/LS and SL/LS ratios are significantly higher in patients with portal HCV compared to lobular ALD. Thus, combined LS and SS or SL measurements provide additional information about disease etiology and disease-specific complications.Lay summaryHerein, we show that patients with hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) have higher spleen stiffness and portal pressure than patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), within the same fibrosis stage and matched to liver stiffness. Thus, the spleen stiffness to liver stiffness ratio is significantly higher in patients with HCV compared to ALD. Additionally, patients with HCV more commonly progress to portal hypertension-related complications (e.g. variceal bleeding), while patients with ALD more commonly progress to liver failure (e.g. jaundice). The spleen stiffness to liver stiffness ratio is a useful tool to confirm disease etiology and predict disease-specific complications.