Dataset Information

Predictive Validity of the Snatch Pull Force-Velocity Profile to Determine the Snatch One Repetition-Maximum in Male and Female Elite Weightlifters.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The prediction of one repetition-maximum (1RM) performance from specific tests is highly relevant for the monitoring of training in weightlifting. Therefore, this study aimed at examining the predictive validity of the theoretical 1RM snatch (snatch_th) computed from the two-point snatch pull force-velocity relationship (FvR₂) to determine actual snatch 1RM performance in elite weightlifters.

Methods

Eight (three female, five male) elite weightlifters carried out a 1RM snatch test followed by a snatch pull test with loads of 80% and 110% of the previously determined 1RM snatch. Barbell kinematics were determined for all lifts using video-tracking. From the snatch pull barbell kinematics, the snatch pull FvR₂ was modeled and the snatch_th was calculated.

Results

The main findings indicated a non-significant (p = 0.706) and trivial (d = 0.01) mean difference between the actual 1RM snatch performance and the snatch_th. Both measures showed an extremely large correlation (r = 0.99). The prediction accuracy of the actual 1RM snatch from snatch_th was 0.2 ± 1.5 kg (systematic bias ± standard deviation of differences).

Conclusions

This study provides a new approach to estimate 1RM snatch performance in elite weightlifters using the snatch pull FvR₂. The results demonstrate that the snatch_th-model accurately predicts 1RM snatch performance.

SUBMITTER: Sandau I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8167790 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeThe main aim of this investigation was to quantify differences in sprint mechanical variables across sports and within each sport. Secondary aims were to quantify sex differences and relationships among the variables.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study of elite athletes, 235 women (23 ± 5 y and 65 ± 7 kg) and 431 men (23 ± 4 y and 80 ± 12 kg) from 23 different sports (including 128 medalists from World Championships and/or Olympic Games) were tested in a 40-m sprint at the Norwegian Olympic Training Center between 1995 and 2018. These were pre-existing data from quarterly or semi-annual testing that the athletes performed for training purposes. Anthropometric and speed-time sprint data were used to calculate the theoretical maximal velocity, horizontal force, horizontal power, slope of the force-velocity relationship, maximal ratio of force, and index of force application technique.ResultsSubstantial differences in mechanical profiles were observed across sports. Athletes in sports in which sprinting ability is an important predictor of success (e.g., athletics sprinting, jumping and bobsleigh) produced the highest values for most variables, whereas athletes in sports in which sprinting ability is not as important tended to produce substantially lower values. The sex differences ranged from small to large, depending on variable of interest. Although most of the variables were strongly associated with 10- and 40-m sprint time, considerable individual differences in sprint mechanical variables were observed among equally performing athletes.ConclusionsOur data from a large sample of elite athletes tested under identical conditions provides a holistic picture of the force-velocity-power profile continuum in athletes. The data indicate that sprint mechanical variables are more individual than sport specific. The values presented in this study could be used by coaches to develop interventions that optimize the training stimulus to the individual athlete.

Project description:Over the past decade, force-velocity (F-v) profiling has emerged as a promising tool for assessing neuromuscular capacity to design individually tailored interventions in diverse populations. To date, a limited number of studies have addressed the optimization of the linear method for measuring F-v profiles of single-joint isokinetic movements. We aimed to simplify the measurement of knee extension (KE) and knee flexion (KF) isokinetic tasks by evaluating the most appropriate combination of two velocities (i.e., the 2-point method). Twenty-two healthy participants (11 males and 11 females) were included in the study. Isokinetic peak torque was measured at nine angular velocities (30-60-90-120-150-180-210-240-300°/s) and under isometric conditions (at 150° and 120° of KF for KE, and KF, respectively). Maximal theoretical force (F0), maximal theoretical velocity (v0), slope of the relationship (Sfv) and maximal theoretical power (Pmax) were derived from the linear F-v profiles of KE and KF and compared between the 9-point method and all possible combinations (36 in total) of the 2-point methods. The F-v profiles obtained from nine points were linear for KE (R2 = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.94–0.96) and KF (R2 = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.90–0.95), with F0 underestimating isometric force. Further analyses revealed great to excellent validity (range: ICCs = 0.89–0.99; CV = 2.54%–4.34%) and trivial systematic error (range: ES = −0.11–0.24) of the KE 2-point method when force from distant velocities (30°/s, 60°/s or 90°/s combined with 210°/s, 240°/s or 300°/s) was used. Similarly, great to excellent validity and trivial systematic error of the KF 2-point method for F0 and Pmax (range: ICC = 0.90–0.96; CV = 2.94%–6.38%; ES = −0.07–0.14) were observed when using the previously described combinations of velocities. These results suggest that practitioners should consider using more distant velocities when performing simplified isokinetic 2-point single-joint F-v profiling. Furthermore, the F-v profile has the potential to differentiate between the mechanical properties of knee extensors and flexors and could therefore serve as a potential descriptor of performance.

Project description:We have an operant rat model of upper extremity reaching and grasping in which we examined the impact of performing a high force high repetition (High-ForceHR) versus a low force low repetition (Low-ForceHR) task for 18weeks on the radius and ulna, compared to age-matched controls. High-ForceHR rats performed at 4 reaches/min and 50% of their maximum voluntary pulling force for 2h/day, 3days/week. Low-ForceHR rats performed at 6% maximum voluntary pulling force. High-ForceHR rats showed decreased trabecular bone volume in the distal metaphyseal radius, decreased anabolic indices in this same bone region (e.g., decreased osteoblasts and bone formation rate), and increased catabolic indices (e.g., microcracks, increased osteocyte apoptosis, secreted sclerostin, RANKL, and osteoclast numbers), compared to controls. Distal metaphyseal trabeculae in the ulna of High-ForceHR rats showed a non-significant decrease in bone volume, some catabolic indices (e.g., decreased trabecular numbers) yet also some anabolic indices (e.g., increased osteoblasts and trabecular thickness). In contrast, the mid-diaphyseal region of High-ForceHR rats' radial and ulnar bones showed few to no microarchitecture differences and no changes in apoptosis, sclerostin or RANKL levels, compared to controls. In further contrast, Low-ForceHR rats showed increased trabecular bone volume in the radius in the distal metaphysis and increased cortical bone area its mid-diaphysis. These changes were accompanied by increased anabolic indices, no microcracks or osteocyte apoptosis, and decreased RANKL in each region, compared to controls. Ulnar bones of Low-ForceHR rats also showed increased anabolic indices, although fewer than in the adjacent radius. Thus, prolonged performance of an upper extremity reaching and grasping task is loading-, region-, and bone-dependent, with high force loads at high repetition rates inducing region-specific increases in bone degradative changes that were most prominent in distal radial trabeculae, while low force task loads at high repetition rates induced adaptive bone responses.