Dataset Information

EPCT-18. A TWO-PART, PHASE 1 STUDY OF RHENIUM-186 NANOLIPOSOME (186RNL) DELIVERED BY CONVECTION ENHANCED DELIVERY FOR RECURRENT, REFRACTORY, OR PROGRESSIVE EPENDYMOMA AND HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA (HGG) AND NEWLY DIAGNOSED DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA (DIPG)

ABSTRACT: Abstract Ependymoma, HGG, and DIPG are gliomas that are often difficult to treat, frequently aggressive, and often carry an extremely poor prognosis. While external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) remains a central component of the management of pediatric gliomas, it is limited by tolerance of the surrounding normal brain tissue. Rhenium-186 NanoLiposome (186RNL) permits the selective delivery of beta-emitting radiation of high specific activity with excellent retention in the tumor. In a Phase 1 trial in adults with recurrent glioblastoma (NCT01906385), the mean absorbed dose to the tumor when coverage was 75% or greater (n=10) was 392 Gy (CI 306 – 478). Thus far, the therapy has been well tolerated, no dose-limiting toxicity has been observed, and no treatment-related serious adverse events have occurred despite markedly higher absorbed doses than typically delivered by EBRT (n=18).

Methods

This is a two-part, Phase 1 dose-finding study followed by an expansion cohort to explore efficacy. Part 1 will enroll up to 18 subjects to determine the maximum feasible dose (MFD) of 186RNL administered by convection enhanced delivery (CED). Tumor size will be limited to a diameter of 4 cm in the longest axis and a volume of 34 mL. The dose limiting toxicity period (DLT) is 28 days post infusion. Part 2 will independently evaluate 186RNL in 3 different cohorts: Cohort A: up to 12 subjects with a diagnosis of recurrent, refractory, or progressive ependymoma; Cohort B: up to 12 subjects with a diagnosis of recurrent, refractory, or progressive HGG; Cohort C: up to 15 subjects with newly diagnosed DIPG. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR) by Radiographic Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) criteria. Secondary endpoints are PFS-24 and OS-24 in Cohort A and PFS-12 and OS-12 in Cohorts B and C. Planned enrollment will begin in H2 2021.

SUBMITTER: Plant A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8168102 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract BACKGROUND: Median survival from DIPG is less than one year. In a phase 1 dose escalation study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01502917) 124I-omburtamab targeting B7-H3 was administered intratumorally using CED. METHODS: CED was performed between 4-14 weeks post radiation therapy. Using a 3 + 3 design, 124I-omburtamab was escalated from 0.25-10.0 mCi and infusion volumes (Vi) from 250-10,000 µl with serial 124I PET/CT performed up to ~1 week post-administration. Toxicities were assessed for 30 days. Dose escalation safety was evaluated. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier statistics. RESULTS: 46 children were treated and evaluable for toxicity and survival;4 patients received partial doses and were evaluable for toxicity only. Three patients experienced dose limiting toxicities. Eleven patients had transient treatment related grade 3 toxicities with no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Grade 3 nervous system toxicities included: muscular weakness(n=8), dysarthria(n=4), ataxia(n=3), dysphagia(n=3), and gait disturbance(n=1). Lesion absorbed doses ranged from 1,000-1,500cGy/mCi, with lesion-to-whole body radiation absorbed-dose ratios of ~900. A dose of 8mCi and infusion volume of 8,000 µl is safe and may provide a distribution volume up to 20cm3. Median survival was 15.3 months (n =46, 95% CI 12.7, 17.3). Survival rate estimates (95% CI) at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years were 0.67 (0.55;0.82); 0.18 (0.09;0.35); 0.10 (0.04;0.26); and 0.05 (0.01;0.20). Four patients survived >3 years; two remain alive (61+ and 106+ months);two have died (44 and 53 month) with distant CNS disease and one with extra-CNS metastasis. CONCLUSION: Administration of escalating doses and volumes of 124I-omburtamab via CED was a viable option for this patient subgroup. The median overall survival was increased 3-4 months compared to historical controls. Anecdotal long-term survival if validated with a planned phase 2 trial would support the concept of whole neuroaxis treatment in combination with CED in a subset of DIPG patients.

Project description:Abstract PURPOSE: To correlate MR imaging findings with molecular analyses in DIPG. METHODS: Baseline MR imaging studies, including standard pre- and post-contrast MR sequences, were reviewed from patients included in our multi-institutional, IRB-approved DIPG trial NCT01182350. Prospectively acquired imaging data were analyzed after study closure, including FLAIR/T2 tumor volume; tumor volume enhancement and cyst/necrosis; median, mean, mode, skewness, and kurtosis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) tumor volume based on both FLAIR and enhancement at baseline. Whole-genome and RNA-sequencing identified histone mutations. We applied univariate Cox proportional-hazards regression modeling to test the association of imaging predictors with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Wilcoxon rank-sum, Kruskal-Wallis, and Fisher’s exact tests compared imaging measures between groups. RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent biopsy and MRI. Median age at trial registration was 6 years (range,3.3–17.5 years); 52% of patients were female. Molecular subgroup study assignments for 48 patients’ tumors were as follows: 28 in MGMT-/EGFR-, 14 in MGMT-/EGFR+, 3 in MGMT+/EGFR-, and 3 in MGMT+/EGFR+. Further genetic testing identified mutations in histones, PDGFRA, ACVR1, TP53, EGFR, PPM1D, FGFR, and/or PI3K. Twenty-three tumors possessed histone mutations in H3F3A, 8 in HIST1H3B, and 3 in HISTH3C. Median follow-up time was 11 months (range,0.4–33 months). Poorer OS (p=0.01) and PFS (p=0.001) were significantly associated with increased enhancing tumor volume. Enhancing tumor volume also differed significantly across molecular subgroups (p=0.047). Tumor enhancement, mode, skewness, and kurtosis ADC-FLAIR differed significantly (p?0.048) between patients with H3F3A and HIST1H3B mutations. Tumor enhancement, median, mode, skewness, and kurtosis ADC-FLAIR also differed significantly (p?0.048) between patients with H3F3A and HIST1H3B or HISTH3C mutations. CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging features including enhancement and ADC histogram parameters correlate to molecular subgroups in DIPG. Further studies are required to verify and refine these findings in a larger cohort.

Project description:Abstract INTRODUCTION While the safety and efficacy of convection-enhanced delivery (CED) have been studied in patients receiving single dose drug infusions, agents for oncologic therapy require repeated or chronic infusions to maintain therapeutic concentrations. Repeat/chronic CED infusions have rarely been described for oncologic purposes. We report on the safety and experience in a group of pediatric patients who received sequential CED into the brainstem for the treatment of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). METHODS Patients were enrolled in a phase I single center clinical trial using 124I-8H9 monoclonal antibody (124I-Omburtamab, Y-mAbs Therapeutics) administered by CED (NCT01502917). Retrospective chart review was used to assess demographic data, CED infusion data, and post-operative neurologic and surgical outcomes. MRI scans were analyzed using iPlan® Flow software (Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany) for volumetric measurements. Target and catheter coordinates as well as radial, depth, and absolute error in MRI space were calculated with the Clearpoint imaging software (Clearpoint®, MRI Interventions Inc. Irvine, USA). RESULTS Seven patients underwent two or more sequential CED infusions. No patients experienced deficits Clinical Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 or greater. One patient had persistent grade 2 cranial nerve deficit after a second infusion. No patients experienced hemorrhage or stroke post-operatively. There was a statistically significant decrease in radial error (p= 0.005) and absolute tip error (p=0.008) for infusion two compared to the initial infusion. Sequential infusions did not result in significantly different distribution capacity between the first and second infusion (Vd:Vi ratio: 2.66 ± 0.35 versus 2.42 ± 0.75; p=0.45). CONCLUSIONS This series demonstrates the ability to safely perform sequential CED infusions into the pediatric brainstem. Past treatments did not negatively influence the procedural work flow, technical application of the targeting interface, or distribution capacity. This limited experience provides a foundation for using repeat CED for oncologic purposes.

Dataset Information

EPCT-18. A TWO-PART, PHASE 1 STUDY OF RHENIUM-186 NANOLIPOSOME (186RNL) DELIVERED BY CONVECTION ENHANCED DELIVERY FOR RECURRENT, REFRACTORY, OR PROGRESSIVE EPENDYMOMA AND HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA (HGG) AND NEWLY DIAGNOSED DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA (DIPG)

Methods

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets