Dataset Information

Precision Radiotherapy: Reduction in Radiation for Oropharyngeal Cancer in the 30 ROC Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Patients with human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancers have excellent outcomes but experience clinically significant toxicities when treated with standard chemoradiotherapy (70 Gy). We hypothesized that functional imaging could identify patients who could be safely deescalated to 30 Gy of radiotherapy.

Methods

In 19 patients, pre- and intratreatment dynamic fluorine-18-labeled fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography (PET) was used to assess tumor hypoxia. Patients without hypoxia at baseline or intratreatment received 30 Gy; patients with persistent hypoxia received 70 Gy. Neck dissection was performed at 4 months in deescalated patients to assess pathologic response. Magnetic resonance imaging (weekly), circulating plasma cell-free DNA, RNA-sequencing, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) were performed to identify potential molecular determinants of response. Samples from an independent prospective study were obtained to reproduce molecular findings. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

Results

Fifteen of 19 patients had no hypoxia on baseline PET or resolution on intratreatment PET and were deescalated to 30 Gy. Of these 15 patients, 11 had a pathologic complete response. Two-year locoregional control and overall survival were 94.4% (95% confidence interval = 84.4% to 100%) and 94.7% (95% confidence interval = 85.2% to 100%), respectively. No acute grade 3 radiation-related toxicities were observed. Microenvironmental features on serial imaging correlated better with pathologic response than tumor burden metrics or circulating plasma cell-free DNA. A WGS-based DNA repair defect was associated with response (P = .02) and was reproduced in an independent cohort (P = .03).

Conclusions

Deescalation of radiotherapy to 30 Gy on the basis of intratreatment hypoxia imaging was feasible, safe, and associated with minimal toxicity. A DNA repair defect identified by WGS was predictive of response. Intratherapy personalization of chemoradiotherapy may facilitate marked deescalation of radiotherapy.

SUBMITTER: Riaz N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8168141 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Addition of nimotuzumab to weekly cisplatin and radiation improves outcomes in head and neck cancer. HPV negative oropharyngeal cancer has unsatisfactory treatment outcomes and is a candidate for escalation of treatment. We wanted to determine whether the addition of nimotuzumab to cisplatin-radiation could improve outcomes in these poor-risk tumors. METHODS:This was a subgroup analysis of a phase 3 randomized study. In this study, locally advanced head and neck cancer patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation were randomly allocated to weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m2 IV)- radiation (66-70 Gy) {CRT arm} or nimotuzumab (200 mg weekly) -weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m2)-radiation (66-70 Gy) {NCRT arm}. The data of HPV negative oropharyngeal cancer was extracted from the database of this study for the analysis. HPV testing was done with p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and reported according to the CAP criteria. The outcomes assessed were progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional control, and overall survival (OS). Interaction test was performed between the study arms and HPV status prior to doing any HPV specific analysis for each of the studied outcomes. Kaplan Meier estimates for 2 year OS with 95%CI was calculated. The hazard ratio was obtained using COX regression analysis. RESULTS:We had 187 HPV negative oropharyngeal cancers, 91 in the CRT arm and 96 in NCRT arm. The interaction test was significant for PFS (p = 0.000), locoregional control (p = 0.007) and overall survival (p = 0.002) but not for DFS (p = 0.072). The 2- year PFS was 31.5% (95%CI 21.5-42) in CRT arm versus 57.2% (95%CI 45.8-67.1) in NCRT arm (HR -0.54; 95%CI 0.36-0.79, p = 0.002). The 2-year LRC was 41.4% (95%CI 29.8-52.6) in the CRT arm versus in 60.4% (95%CI 48.7-70.2) in the NCRT arm (HR -0.61; 95%CI 0.4-0.94, p = 0.024). The addition of nimotuzumab also lead to an improvement in 2-year OS from 39.0% (95%CI 28.4-49.6) to 57.6% (95%CI 46.3-67.4) (HR-0.63, 95%CI 0.43-0.92, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS:The addition of nimotuzumab to weekly cisplatin-radiation improves outcomes inclusive of OS in HPV negative oropharyngeal cancers.

Project description:Severe xerostomia is noted in the majority of patients irradiated for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Extracellular microRNAs (miRNAs) may serve as effective tools allowing prediction of radiation-related toxicity. The aim of this study was to create an efficient prognostic miRNA-based test for severe, patient-rated xerostomia 3 months after primary treatment. This prospective study enrolled OPC patients treated between 2016 and 2018 in three centers in Poland. The primary endpoint was severe (grade ≥3) xerostomia as assessed by the EORTC H&N-35 questionnaires. Initially, a group of 10 patients with severe xerostomia was randomly selected and matched with a comparative group of 10 patients without severe xerostomia. Samples were collected before RT, after receiving 20 Gy and within 24 hours after treatment completion. qPCR arrays (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) were used to quantify expression levels of 752 miRNAs in the serum at all timepoints. The resulting logistic-regression based model was validated in additional 60 patients: 30 with grade >3 xerostomia and 30 without. Of 152 eligible patients, we successfully recruited 111 patients. Severe xerostomia 3 months after treatment was reported by 63 patients (56.8%). Mean dose delivered to parotid glands was higher in both exploratory and validation cohort. The model based on miR-185-5p and miR-425-5p expression levels measured before the start of radiotherapy had AUC 0.96 (95% CI: 0.88-1.00). The model based on the same miRNAs remained robust when parameters were measured after 20 Gy (AUC 0.90 (95% CI: 0.75-1.00)). These results were confirmed in the validation group. In the validation group pre-radiotherapy model application yielded 73.3% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity. In the samples taken after 20 Gy, the same two miRNAs yielded 67.7% sensitivity and 72.4% specificity. The model including pretreatment miR-185-5p and miR-425-5p levels together with mean parotid dose, yielded 90.0% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity. In the validation cohort, this model yielded 80.6 % sensitivity and 55.2 % specificity. The model based on miRNA levels measured after 20 Gy and mean parotid dose had 80.0 % sensitivity and 100% specificity in the exploratory group. In the validation cohort its performance fell to 71.0 % sensitivity and 58.6 % specificity. Serum expression levels of miR-425-5p and miR-185-5p measured before the start of radiotherapy or during therapy (after 20 Gy) had a significant prognostic value for the occurrence of severe xerostomia 3 months after treatment completion. The variability explained by miRNAs appears to be, at least partially, independent from the one related to the dosimetric data.

Project description:Introduction:Peripheral blood count components are accessible and evidently predictive in other cancers but have not been explored in oropharyngeal carcinoma. We examine if there is an association between the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and lymphopenia, as well as if there is an association between baseline neutrophilia, baseline leukocytosis and lymphocyte nadir in oropharyngeal cancer. Materials and Methods:Analysis started with 150 patients from a previous case to case study design, which retrospectively identified adults with oropharyngeal carcinoma, 100 treated with IMRT in 2010-2012 and 50 treated with IMPT in 2011-2014. Pretreatment leukocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte, and hemoglobin levels were extracted, as were neutrophil and lymphocyte nadir levels during radiotherapy. We retained 137 patients with recorded pre-treatment leukocyte and neutrophil levels for associated analysis and 114 patients with recorded lymphocyte levels during radiation and associated analysis. Multivariate survival analyses were done with Cox regression. Results:The radiotherapy type (IMRT vs. IMPT) was not associated with lymphopenia (grade 3 P?>?.99; grade 4 P?=?.55). In univariate analyses, poor overall survival was associated with pretreatment neutrophilia (hazard ratio [HR] 5.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.99-15.7, P?=?.001), pretreatment leukocytosis (HR 4.85, 95% CI 1.73-13.6, P?=?.003), grade 4 lymphopenia during radiotherapy (HR 3.28, 95% CI 1.14-9.44, P?=?.03), and possibly smoking status >10 pack-years (HR 2.88, 95% CI 1.01-8.18, P?=?.05), but only T status was possibly significant in multivariate analysis (HR 2.64, 95% CI 0.99-7.00, P?=?.05). Poor progression-free survival was associated with pretreatment leukocytosis and T status in univariate analysis, and pretreatment neutrophilia and advanced age on multivariate analysis. Conclusions:Treatment modality did not affect blood counts during radiotherapy. Pretreatment neutrophilia, pretreatment leukocytosis, and grade 4 lymphopenia during radiotherapy were associated with worse outcomes after, but establishing causality will require additional work with increased statistical power.