Dataset Information

The Anti-HER3 mAb Seribantumab Effectively Inhibits Growth of Patient-Derived and Isogenic Cell Line and Xenograft Models with Oncogenic NRG1 Fusions.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Oncogenic fusions involving the neuregulin 1 (NRG1) gene are found in approximately 0.2% of cancers of diverse histologies. The resulting chimeric NRG1 proteins bind predominantly to HER3, leading to HER3-HER2 dimerization and activation of downstream growth and survival pathways. HER3 is, therefore, a rational target for therapy in NRG1 fusion-driven cancers.

Experimental design

We developed novel patient-derived and isogenic models of NRG1-rearranged cancers and examined the effect of the anti-HER3 antibody, seribantumab, on growth and activation of signaling networks in vitro and in vivo.

Results

Seribantumab inhibited NRG1-stimulated growth of MCF-7 cells and growth of patient-derived breast (MDA-MB-175-VII, DOC4-NRG1 fusion) and lung (LUAD-0061AS3, SLC3A2-NRG1 fusion) cancer cells harboring NRG1 fusions or NRG1 amplification (HCC-95). In addition, seribantumab inhibited growth of isogenic HBEC cells expressing a CD74-NRG1 fusion (HBECp53-CD74-NRG1) and induced apoptosis in MDA-MB-175-VII and LUAD-0061AS3 cells. Induction of proapoptotic proteins and reduced expression of the cell-cycle regulator, cyclin D1, were observed in seribantumab-treated cells. Treatment of MDA-MB-175-VII, LUAD-0061AS3, and HBECp53-CD74-NRG1 cells with seribantumab reduced phosphorylation of EGFR, HER2, HER3, HER4, and known downstream signaling molecules, such as AKT and ERK1/2. Significantly, administration of seribantumab to mice bearing LUAD-0061AS3 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) and OV-10-0050 (ovarian cancer with CLU-NRG1 fusion) PDX tumors induced regression of tumors by 50%-100%. Afatinib was much less effective at blocking tumor growth.

Conclusions

Seribantumab treatment blocked activation of the four ERBB family members and of downstream signaling, leading to inhibition of NRG1 fusion-dependent tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo in breast, lung, and ovarian patient-derived cancer models.

SUBMITTER: Odintsov I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8172458 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNRG1 gene fusions may be clinically actionable, since cancers carrying the fusion transcripts can be sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The NRG1 gene encodes ligands for the HER2(ERBB2)-ERBB3 heterodimeric receptor tyrosine kinase, and the gene fusions are thought to lead to autocrine stimulation of the receptor. The NRG1 fusion expressed in the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-175 serves as a model example of such fusions, showing the proposed autocrine loop and exceptional drug sensitivity. However, its structure has not been properly characterised, its oncogenic activity has not been fully explained, and there is limited data on such fusions in breast cancer.MethodsWe analysed genomic rearrangements and transcripts of NRG1 in MDA-MB-175 and a panel of 571 breast cancers.ResultsWe found that the MDA-MB-175 fusion-originally reported as a DOC4(TENM4)-NRG1 fusion, lacking the cytoplasmic tail of NRG1-is in reality a double fusion, PPP6R3-TENM4-NRG1, producing multiple transcripts, some of which include the cytoplasmic tail. We hypothesise that many NRG1 fusions may be oncogenic not for lacking the cytoplasmic domain but because they do not encode NRG1's nuclear-localised form. The fusion in MDA-MB-175 is the result of a very complex genomic rearrangement, which we partially characterised, that creates additional expressed gene fusions, RSF1-TENM4, TPCN2-RSF1, and MRPL48-GAB2. We searched for NRG1 rearrangements in 571 breast cancers subjected to genome sequencing and transcriptome sequencing and found four cases (0.7%) with fusions, WRN-NRG1, FAM91A1-NRG1, ARHGEF39-NRG1, and ZNF704-NRG1, all splicing into NRG1 at the same exon as in MDA-MB-175. However, the WRN-NRG1 and ARHGEF39-NRG1 fusions were out of frame. We identified rearrangements of NRG1 in many more (8% of) cases that seemed more likely to inactivate than to create activating fusions, or whose outcome could not be predicted because they were complex, or both. This is not surprising because NRG1 can be pro-apoptotic and is inactivated in some breast cancers.ConclusionsOur results highlight the complexity of rearrangements of NRG1 in breast cancers and confirm that some do not activate but inactivate. Careful interpretation of NRG1 rearrangements will therefore be necessary for appropriate patient management.