Dataset Information

Novel Acoustic Biomarker of Quality of Life in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients.

ABSTRACT: Background Although technological advances to pump design have improved survival, left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients experience variable improvements in quality of life. Methods for optimizing LVAD support to improve quality of life are needed. We investigated whether acoustic signatures obtained from digital stethoscopes can predict patient-centered outcomes in LVAD recipients. Methods and Results We followed precordial sounds over 6 months in 24 LVAD recipients (8 HeartWare HVAD™, 16 HeartMate 3 [HM3]). Subjects recorded their precordial sounds with a digital stethoscope and completed a Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire weekly. We developed a novel algorithm to filter LVAD sounds from recordings. Unsupervised clustering of LVAD-mitigated sounds revealed distinct groups of acoustic features. Of 16 HM3 recipients, 6 (38%) had a unique acoustic feature that we have termed the pulse synchronized sound based on its temporal association with the artificial pulse of the HM3. HM3 recipients with the pulse synchronized sound had significantly better Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores at baseline (median, 89.1 [interquartile range, 86.2-90.4] versus 66.1 [interquartile range, 31.1-73.7]; P=0.03) and over the 6-month study period (marginal mean, 77.6 [95% CI, 66.3-88.9] versus 59.9 [95% CI, 47.9-70.0]; P<0.001). Mechanistically, the pulse synchronized sound shares acoustic features with patient-derived intrinsic sounds. Finally, we developed a machine learning algorithm to automatically detect the pulse synchronized sound within precordial sounds (area under the curve, 0.95, leave-one-subject-out cross-validation). Conclusions We have identified a novel acoustic biomarker associated with better quality of life in HM3 LVAD recipients, which may provide a method for assaying optimized LVAD support.

SUBMITTER: Mainsah BO

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8174227 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceWhile wide-scale adoption of durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) can be attributed to favorable randomized clinical trial outcomes, restrictive selection criteria may be associated with a lack of generalizability to real-world experience.ObjectiveTo estimate the proportion of LVAD recipients who are eligible for clinical trials and to assess whether an association exists between trial eligibility and mortality.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study examined 14 679 patients undergoing primary, intracorporeal continuous-flow LVAD implantation (with or without a right ventricular assist device) in 181 North American centers from January 1, 2012, to June 30, 2017, identified in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS). To simulate a trial population, trial criteria from the Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Therapy With HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) were mapped to INTERMACS variables. Patients were categorized as eligible for trial inclusion or ineligible for trial inclusion and by number of ineligibility criteria met. Follow-up in INTERMACS was complete for all patients through October 31, 2017. Data were analyzed from July 2019 through November 2020.ExposuresUndergoing durable LVAD implantation.Main outcomes and measuresTrial eligibility and postimplant mortality were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsAmong 14 679 recipients, mean (SD) age was 57 (13) years, 11 503 individuals (78.4%) were men, and 11 406 individuals (77.7%) presented with New York Heart Association class IV heart failure. A total of 6429 recipients (43.8%) were ineligible for trial inclusion, of whom 4226 individuals (65.7%) met 1 ineligibility criterion, 1442 individuals (22.4%) met 2 criteria, and 761 individuals (11.8%) met 3 or more criteria. Estimated mortality for recipients who were trial-ineligible was higher than for recipients who were trial-eligible (1-year mortality: 25.3% [95% CI, 24.2%-26.5%] vs 16.2% [95% CI, 15.4%-17.1%]; 3-year mortality: 42.8% [95% CI, 41.3%-44.4%] vs 36.4% [95% CI, 35.0%-37.8%]; log-rank P < .001 for both). Patients who were trial-ineligible had increased risk of mortality compared with patients who were trial-eligible if they met 1 trial ineligibility criterion (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16 [95% CI, 1.08-1.24]; P < .001), 2 trial ineligibility criteria (HR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.36-1.67]; P < .001), or 3 or more trial ineligibility criteria (HR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.84-2.39]; P < .001). Among patients meeting only 1 ineligibility criterion, 4 criteria were independently associated with mortality: prior or ongoing mechanical circulatory support (HR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.23-2.16]; P = .001), elevated creatinine level (HR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.17-1.72]; P < .001), elevated bilirubin level (HR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.17-1.66]; P < .001), and low albumin or prealbumin level (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.05-1.33]; P = .007).Conclusions and relevanceThese findings suggest that while treatment for patients who are ineligible for LVAD trial inclusion should be weighed against medical management, more consideration could be given to designing trials with eligibility criteria that reflect real-world experience.

Dataset Information

Novel Acoustic Biomarker of Quality of Life in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets