Dataset Information

Development and Interpretation of a Genomic Instability Derived lncRNAs Based Risk Signature as a Predictor of Prognosis for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is a kind of frequently diagnosed cancer, leading to high death rate in patients. Genomic instability (GI) is regarded as playing indispensable roles in tumorigenesis and impacting the prognosis of patients. The aberrant regulation of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is a main cause of GI. We combined the somatic mutation profiles and expression profiles to identify GI derived lncRNAs (GID-lncRNAs) in ccRCC and developed a GID-lncRNAs based risk signature for prognosis prediction and medication guidance.

Methods

We decided cases with top 25% cumulative number of somatic mutations as genomically unstable (GU) group and last 25% as genomically stable (GS) group, and identified differentially expressed lncRNAs (GID-lncRNAs) between two groups. Then we developed the risk signature with all overall survival related GID-lncRNAs with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression. The functions of the GID-lncRNAs were partly interpreted by enrichment analysis. We finally validated the effectiveness of the risk signature in prognosis prediction and medication guidance.

Results

We developed a seven-lncRNAs (LINC00460, AL139351.1, AC156455.1, AL035446.1, LINC02471, AC022509.2, and LINC01606) risk signature and divided all samples into high-risk and low-risk groups. Patients in high-risk group were in more severe clinicopathologic status (higher tumor grade, pathological stage, T stage, and more metastasis) and were deemed to have less survival time and lower survival rate. The efficacy of prognosis prediction was validated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Enrichment analysis revealed that the lncRNAs in the risk signature mainly participate in regulation of cell cycle, DNA replication, material metabolism, and other vital biological processes in the tumorigenesis of ccRCC. Moreover, the risk signature could help assess the possibility of response to precise treatments.

Conclusion

Our study combined the somatic mutation profiles and the expression profiles of ccRCC for the first time and developed a GID-lncRNAs based risk signature for prognosis predicting and therapeutic scheme deciding. We validated the efficacy of the risk signature and partly interpreted the roles of the seven lncRNAs composing the risk signature in ccRCC. Our study provides novel insights into the roles of genomic instability derived lncRNAs in ccRCC.

SUBMITTER: Yang H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8176022 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundClear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common subtype of kidney cancers. As cuproptosis, a new cell death mechanism proposed recently, differs from all other known mechanisms regulating cell death, we aimed to create prognostic markers using cuproptosis-related long non-coding ribonucleic acids (RNAs; lncRNAs) and elucidate the molecular mechanism.MethodsData from transcriptome RNA sequencing of ccRCC samples and the relevant clinical data were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and Pearson's correlation analysis was implemented to obtain the cuproptosis-related lncRNAs. Then, univariate Cox, multivariate Cox, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator Cox analyses were performed to construct the risk signatures. The cuproptosis-related lncRNAs predictive signature was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curves and subgroup analysis. Finally, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA), tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), and immune checkpoints were performed to explore the relationship between immunity and patient prognosis.ResultsFive cuproptosis-related lncRNAs, including FOXD2-AS1, LINC00460, AC091212.1, AC007365.1, and AC026401.3, were used to construct the signature. In the training and test sets, low-risk groups (as identified by a risk score lower than the median) demonstrated a better prognosis with an area under the curve for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival being 0.793, 0.716, and 0.719, respectively. GSEA analysis suggested significant enrichment of the tricarboxylic acid cycle and metabolism-related pathways in the low-risk group. Besides, both ssGSEA and TIME suggested that the high-risk group exhibited more active immune infiltration.ConclusionWe proposed a cuproptosis-related lncRNAs signature, which had the potential for prognoses and prediction. Our findings might contribute to elucidating potential genomic biomarkers and targets for future therapies in the cuproptosis-related signaling pathways.

Project description:BackgroundRecent studies have demonstrated that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are involved in regulating tumor cell ferroptosis. However, prognostic signatures based on ferroptosis-related lncRNAs (FRLs) and their relationship to the immune microenvironment have not been comprehensively explored in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).MethodsIn the present study, the expression profiles of ccRCC were acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database; 459 patient specimens and 69 adjacent normal tissues were randomly separated into training or validation cohorts at a 7:3 ratio. We identified 7 FRLs that constitute a prognostic signature according to the differential analysis, correlation analysis, univariate regression, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox analysis. To identify the independence of risk score as a prognostic factor, univariate and multivariate regression analyses were also performed. Furthermore, CIBERSORT was conducted to analyze the immune infiltration of patients in the high-risk and low-risk groups. Subsequently, the differential expression of immune checkpoint and m6A genes was analyzed in the two risk groups.ResultsA 7-FRLs prognostic signature of ccRCC was developed to distinguish patients into high-risk and low-risk groups with significant survival differences. This signature has great prognostic performance, with the area under the curve (AUC) for 1, 3, and 5 years of 0.713, 0.700, 0.726 in the training set and 0.727, 0.667, and 0.736 in the testing set, respectively. Moreover, this signature was significantly associated with immune infiltration. Correlation analysis showed that risk score was positively correlated with regulatory T cells (Tregs), activated CD4 memory T cells, CD8 T cells and follicular helper T cells, whereas it was inversely correlated with monocytes and M2 macrophages. In addition, the expression of fourteen immune checkpoint genes and nine m6A-related genes varied significantly between the two risk groups.ConclusionWe established a novel FRLs-based prognostic signature for patients with ccRCC, containing seven lncRNAs with precise predictive performance. The FRLs prognostic signature may play a significant role in antitumor immunity and provide a promising idea for individualized targeted therapy for patients with ccRCC.

Project description:BackgroundChromosomal instability (CIN) is a cancer hallmark and it is difficult to directly measure its phenotype, while a CIN25 gene signature was established to do so in several cancer types. However, it is currently unclear whether there exists this signature in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), and if so, which biological and clinical implications it has.MethodsTranscriptomic profiling was performed on 10 ccRCC tumors and matched renal non-tumorous tissues (NTs) for CIN25 signature analyses. TCGA and E-MBAT1980 ccRCC cohorts were analyzed for the presence of CIN25 signature, CIN25 score-based ccRCC classification, and association with molecular alterations and overall or progression-free survival (OS or PFS). IMmotion150 and 151 cohorts of ccRCC patients treated with Sunitinib were analyzed for the CIN25 impact on Sunitinib response and survival.ResultsThe transcriptomic analysis of 10 patient samples showed robustly upregulated expression of the CIN25 signature genes in ccRCC tumors, which were further confirmed in TCGA and E-MBAT1980 ccRCC cohorts. Based on their expression heterogeneity, ccRCC tumors were categorized into CIN25-C1 (low) and C2 (high) subtypes. The CIN25-C2 subtype was associated with significantly shorter patient OS and PFS, and characterized by increased telomerase activity, proliferation, stemness and EMT. The CIN25 signature reflects not only a CIN phenotype, but also levels of the whole genomic instability including mutation burden, microsatellite instability and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Importantly, the CIN25 score was significantly associated with Sunitinib response and survival. In IMmotion151 cohort, patients in the CIN25-C1 group exhibited 2-fold higher remission rate than those in the CIN25-C2 group (P = 0.0004) and median PFS in these two groups was 11.2 and 5.6 months, respectively (P = 7.78E-08). Similar results were obtained from the IMmotion150 cohort analysis. Higher EZH2 expression and poor angiogenesis, well characterized factors leading to Sunitinib resistance, were enriched in the CIN25-C2 tumors.ConclusionThe CIN25 signature identified in ccRCC serves as a biomarker for CIN and other genome instability phenotypes and predicts patient outcomes and response to Sunitinib treatment. A PCR quantification is enough for the CIN25-based ccRCC classification, which holds great promises in clinical routine application.