Dataset Information

Limitation of the external glenohumeral joint rotation is associated with subacromial impingement syndrome, especially pain.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Subacromial impingement syndrome is a common disorder associated with functional impairment and disability of the shoulder. Internal/external glenohumeral rotation is important for shoulder function. However, because it is difficult to measure the glenohumeral joint rotation angle physically, the relationship between this angle and the clinical symptoms of subacromial impingement syndrome is still largely unknown. Using advanced cine-magnetic resonance imaging techniques, we designed a study to improve our understanding of the nature of this relationship.

Methods

We evaluated 100 shoulders with subacromial impingement syndrome. Patients underwent cine-magnetic resonance imaging during axial rotation with the arm adducted. During imaging, patients rotated their shoulder from maximum internal rotation to maximum external rotation over 10 seconds and then to maximum internal rotation over 10 seconds. The rotation angles were then evaluated using a series of axial images. The Constant-Murley (Constant) and UCLA scores for each patient were determined, and the correlation between the scores and rotational angles was assessed. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the Constant pain score, and the rotational angles of each group were compared. Rotational angles were also compared between shoulders with and without night pain.

Results

The external rotation angle showed a significant but low correlation with the Constant and UCLA scores (ρ = 0.24 and 0.24, respectively), whereas the internal rotation angle did not. In comparing the pain groups of Constant score and UCLA score, the external rotation angle significantly decreased as pain increased (P < .01), demonstrating a negative correlation (ρ = -0.47, -0.41, respectively). Additionally, the shoulders of patients with night pain showed significantly more restriction of external rotation angles than the shoulders of those without night pain (P = .01).

Conclusions

Limitation of the glenohumeral joint's external rotation is correlated with pain, for which we explore possible explanations. The results suggest that night pain can be effectively reduced using therapeutic interventions that target external rotational dysfunction.

SUBMITTER: Ishii D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8178632 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo analyze biopsy samples from the subscapularis tendon and from the joint capsule from male patients with subacromial impingement syndrome and compare them with samples from male patients with post-traumatic recurrent shoulder instability, to detect increased inflammatory activity that might be present inside the humeroscapular joint.MethodsTwenty male patients scheduled for surgery for either subacromial decompression or Bankart reconstruction were included. Four biopsies from each patient were obtained during surgery from the capsule and the subscapularis tendon. Each specimen was analyzed for TNF-α, IL-6, CD-3 and CD-72. Multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry was performed on histological samples from the capsule and tendon to demonstrate the level of inflammatory markers. Fluorescence microscope images were acquired using an automated scanning system. On each slide, the number of pixels was registered and used in the analyses.ResultsThe subacromial impingement syndrome group comprised eight patients, median age 53 (45-74) years, while the instability group 12, median age 27 (22-48) years (p < 0.00001). The amount of IL-6 and TNF-α was significantly higher in the subscapularis tendon of the patients with subacromial impingement syndrome compared with instability patients (p = 0.0015 and p = 0.0008 respectively). In the capsular samples, significantly higher amount of TNF-α and CD-72 was found in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome compared with instability patients (p < 0.0001 for both). On the other hand, the amount of CD-3 was significantly higher in the instability group (p = 0.0013).ConclusionsThis study provides evidence that an extended inflammatory process is present, not only in the subacromial bursa but also in the glenohumeral joint in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.Level of evidenceLevel III.Clinical relevanceTo develop a treatment targeted towards intra-articular inflammatory cytokines appears appealing.

Project description:Scapula and humerus motion associated with common manual wheelchair tasks is hypothesized to reduce the subacromial space. However, previous work relied on either marker-based motion capture for kinematic measures, which is prone to skin-motion artifact; or ultrasound imaging for arthrokinematic measures, which are 2D and acquired in statically-held positions. The aim of this study was to use a fluoroscopy-based approach to accurately quantify glenohumeral kinematics during manual wheelchair use, and compare tasks for a subset of parameters theorized to be associated with mechanical impingement. Biplane images of the dominant shoulder were acquired during scapular plane elevation, propulsion, sideways lean, and weight-relief raise in ten manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. A computed tomography scan of the shoulder was obtained, and model-based tracking was used to quantify six-degree-of-freedom glenohumeral kinematics. Axial rotation and superior/inferior and anterior/posterior humeral head positions were characterized for full activity cycles and compared between tasks. The change in the subacromial space was also determined for the period of each task defined by maximal change in the aforementioned parameters. Propulsion, sideways lean, and weight-relief raise, but not scapular plane elevation, were marked by mean internal rotation (8.1°, 10.8°, 14.7°, -49.2° respectively). On average, the humeral head was most superiorly positioned during the weight-relief raise (1.6 ± 0.9 mm), but not significantly different from the sideways lean (0.8 ± 1.1 mm) (p = 0.191), and much of the task was characterized by inferior translation. Scaption was the only task without a defined period of superior translation on average. Pairwise comparisons revealed no significant differences between tasks for anterior/posterior position (task means range: 0.1-1.7 mm), but each task exhibited defined periods of anterior translation. There was not a consistent trend across tasks between internal rotation, superior translation, and anterior translation with reductions in the subacromial space. Further research is warranted to determine the likelihood of mechanical impingement during these tasks based on the measured task kinematics and reductions in the subacromial space.

Project description:IntroductionArthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) is the most commonly performed surgical intervention for shoulder pain, yet evidence on its efficacy is limited. The rationale for the surgery rests on the tenet that symptom relief is achieved through decompression of the rotator cuff tendon passage. The primary objective of this superiority trial is to compare the efficacy of ASD versus diagnostic arthroscopy (DA) in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS), where DA differs only by the lack of subacromial decompression. A third group of supervised progressive exercise therapy (ET) will allow for pragmatic assessment of the relative benefits of surgical versus non-operative treatment strategies.Methods and analysisFinnish Subacromial Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial is an ongoing multicentre, three-group randomised controlled study. We performed two-fold concealed allocation, first by randomising patients to surgical (ASD or DA) or conservative (ET) treatment in 2:1 ratio and then those allocated to surgery further to ASD or DA in 1:1 ratio. Our two primary outcomes are pain at rest and at arm activity, assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS). We will quantify the treatment effect as the difference between the groups in the change in the VAS scales with the associated 95% CI at 24 months. Our secondary outcomes are functional assessment (Constant score and Simple shoulder test), quality of life (15D and SF-36), patient satisfaction, proportions of responders and non-responders, reoperations/treatment conversions, all at 2 years post-randomisation, as well as adverse effects and complications. We recruited a total of 210 patients from three tertiary referral centres. We will conduct the primary analysis on the intention-to-treat basis.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Pirkanmaa Hospital District and duly registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The findings of this study will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.Trial registration numberNCT00428870; Pre-results.

Project description:BackgroundBased on Euler/Cardan analysis, prior investigations have reported up to 80° of glenohumeral (GH) external rotation during arm elevation, dependent on the plane of elevation (PoE). However, the subtraction of Euler/Cardan angles does not compute the rotation around the humerus' longitudinal axis (i.e. axial rotation). Clinicians want to understand the true rotation around the humerus' longitudinal axis and rely on laboratories to inform their understanding of underlying shoulder biomechanics, especially for the GH joint since its motion cannot be visually ascertained. True GH axial rotation has not been previously measured in vivo, and its difference from Euler/Cardan (apparent) axial rotation is unknown.Research questionWhat is the true GH axial rotation during arm elevation and external rotation, and does it vary from apparent axial rotation and by PoE?MethodsTwenty healthy subjects (10 M/10 F, ages 22-66) were recorded using biplane fluoroscopy while performing arm elevation in the coronal, scapular and sagittal planes, and external rotation in 0° and 90° of abduction. Apparent GH axial rotation was computed using the xz'y'' and yx'y'' sequences. True GH axial rotation was computed by integrating the projection of GH angular velocity onto the humerus' longitudinal axis. One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping was utilized to compare apparent versus true axial rotation, axial rotation versus 0°, and detect differences in axial rotation by PoE.ResultsIn contrast to apparent axial rotation, true GH axial rotation does not differ by PoE and is not different than 0° during arm elevation at higher elevation angles. The spherical area between the sequence-specific and actual humeral trajectory explains the difference between apparent and true axial rotation.SignificanceProper quantification of axial rotation is important because biomechanics literature informs clinical understanding of shoulder biomechanics. Clinicians care about true axial rotation, which should be reported in future studies of shoulder kinematics.