Dataset Information

Improving Mental Health Treatment Initiation among Depressed Community Dwelling Older Adults.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Depression screening has been widely implemented in community settings to increase detection of late-life depression. Rates of treatment initiation are low without additional structured follow-up, however. The current study evaluates the effectiveness of a brief psychosocial intervention, Open Door, designed to improve initiation of mental health treatment among clients of aging service meals programs.

Design

Older adult social service clients with depressive symptoms were randomized to either the Open Door intervention or a Service Referral control condition. In Open Door, the counselor collaborates with the client to identify and address both attitudinal and structural barriers to seeking mental health treatment. Independent research assessments were conducted 12 and 24 weeks after baseline to document treatment initiation (at least one session).

Results

At follow up, 64.6% (104 out of 161) of participants had initiated a provider visit. Participants in Open Door were more likely to initiate treatment compared with those in the control condition (χ(2) = 5.83, df = 2, p = 0.016). Among participants with at least mild depressive symptoms, Open Door remained significantly more effective than the control condition (p < 0.05). In multivariate analyses controlling for gender differences, both participation in the Open Door group and depression severity predicted treatment initiation (χ(2) = 15.18, df = 3, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

High rates of depression have been documented among older adults receiving social services (case management or home meals). The Open Door program offers a useful strategy to overcome the barriers to treatment initiation while fitting within the responsibilities of aging service staff. The intervention can improve initiation of late-life depression care.

SUBMITTER: Sirey JA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8178741 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDespite rapid growth in the popularity of smartwatches, evidence lacks regarding older adults' acceptance of smartwatches. Since most wearable sensors are not designed specifically for older adults, there is a need to examine wearability and usability challenges of wearable sensing devices faced by older adults to facilitate the use of objective measurements of health and mobility.ObjectivesWe aimed to examine older adults' perceptions of GPS-enabled smartwatches and to identify potential barriers and facilitators of smartwatch and sensor data use.MethodsAs part of a larger feasibility study, we conducted a mixed-methods study that included a descriptive content analysis of interviews and a brief usability survey with 30 participants aged 60 years and older after they had used a smartwatch for 3 days.ResultsMost participants perceived wearable activity trackers including smartwatches and sensor-based data as useful for tracking health, finding activity patterns and promoting healthy behaviours. Privacy was of little concern, leading to willingness to share activity and location data with others. Participants identified barriers to usability as clumsy design, lack of aesthetic appeal, and difficulty reading the display and using the GPS tracking function. In contrast, identified facilitators of adoption included a big display, high-tech look, self-awareness and possible behaviour change.ConclusionsSmartwatches have the potential of personalised detection of health deterioration and disability prevention, based on analysis of older adults' activities in free-living environments. The usefulness of this technology for older adults can be significantly increased by addressing usability issues and providing instructions on challenging features.Implications for practiceTo support sustained self-monitoring behaviours through wearable sensor devices in older adults, it is critical to examine how they perceive those devices and identify factors affecting technology acceptance that can maximise adoption.

Project description:Anecdotal evidence suggested that waiting times within the older adults community mental health team (OA CMHT) had been increasing over time. An assessment and evaluation was indicated to ensure best quality care was provided for patients. A comparison was made between waiting times in January to December 2011 compared with August 2013 to July 2014. In 2011 the mean number of days until initial assessment from the point of referral was 12 days for routine cases, and 3.6 days for urgent cases. The re-audit showed the number of days increased to 15.89 days for routine cases, and 9.81 days for urgent cases. Contributory factors were reviewed, and it was felt that to address this problem, a duty worker role was necessary. The role of the duty worker was divided into triaging and allocating work. The triaging process was to ensure all urgent cases were highlighted early and acted upon. The duty worker's role was also to gather sufficient information from the referrer, to reduce the risks of inadequate knowledge delaying assessment. In addition, the allocating process required the duty worker to designate a clinician in charge of the case upon receipt of referral. This ensured that clinicians were able to offer the earliest possible appointment slot for the initial assessment, and thus reduce waiting times. Following implementation, findings from September 2014 to February 2015 showed an improvement in average waiting times, as well as an improvement in the percentage of assessments reviewed within previously set standards. For routine reviews, the mean time until assessment was 10.68 days. For urgent reviews, the mean time until initial assessment was 6.8 days. However, it was noted that majority of urgent reviews were still not being reviewed in time. The outcomes of this study demonstrated an improvement of both waiting times, and percentage of patients being seen within set standards following a single intervention. In the current climate of cost efficiency savings, it is important for services to continue to find ways to streamline and improve upon current practices, to ensure the best outcome for patients.