Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

19 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Identification and treatment of T2-low asthma in the era of biologics.

ABSTRACT: Currently, and based on the development of relevant biologic therapies, T2-high is the most well-defined endotype of asthma. Although much progress has been made in elucidating T2-high inflammation pathways, no specific clinically applicable biomarkers for T2-low asthma have been identified. The therapeutic approach of T2-low asthma is a problem urgently needing resolution, firstly because these patients have poor response to steroids, and secondly because they are not candidates for the newer targeted biologic agents. Thus, there is an unmet need for the identification of biomarkers that can help the diagnosis and endotyping of T2-low asthma. Ongoing investigation is focusing on neutrophilic airway inflammation mediators as therapeutic targets, including interleukin (IL)-8, IL-17, IL-1, IL-6, IL-23 and tumour necrosis factor-α; molecules that target restoration of corticosteroid sensitivity, mainly mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors; phosphodiesterase (PDE)3 inhibitors that act as bronchodilators and PDE4 inhibitors that have an anti-inflammatory effect; and airway smooth muscle mass attenuation therapies, mainly for patients with paucigranulocytic inflammation. This article aims to review the evidence for noneosinophilic inflammation being a target for therapy in asthma; discuss current and potential future therapeutic approaches, such as novel molecules and biologic agents; and assess clinical trials of licensed drugs in the treatment of T2-low asthma.

SUBMITTER: Kyriakopoulos C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8181790 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Severe T2-high asthma in the biologics era: European experts' opinion.

Project description:The European Respiratory Biologics Forum gathered participants from 21 countries in Madrid, Spain, to discuss the management and treatment of severe asthma in the era of biologics. The current insights on the pathophysiology of severe asthma were discussed, as well as the role of respiratory biologics in clinical practice and strategies for eliminating chronic use of oral corticosteroids. The participants also highlighted the key challenges in identifying patients with severe asthma based on phenotypes, biomarkers and treatable traits, and the existing problems in patient referral to specialist care. The monitoring of treatment was debated and the need for a change towards precision medicine and personalised care was emphasised throughout the meeting. This review provides a summary of the discussions and highlights important concerns identified by the participants regarding the current management of severe asthma.

| S-EPMC9489011 | biostudies-literature

Asthma in the Precision Medicine Era: Biologics and Probiotics.

Project description:Asthma is a major global health issue. Over 300 million people worldwide suffer from this chronic inflammatory airway disease. Typical clinical symptoms of asthma are characterized by a recurrent wheezy cough, chest tightness, and shortness of breath. The main goals of asthma management are to alleviate asthma symptoms, reduce the risk of asthma exacerbations, and minimize long-term medicinal adverse effects. However, currently available type 2 T helper cells (Th2)-directed treatments are often ineffective due to the heterogeneity of the asthma subgroups, which manifests clinically with variable and poor treatment responses. Personalized precision therapy of asthma according to individualized clinical characteristics (phenotype) and laboratory biomarkers (endotype) is the future prospect. This mini review discusses the molecular mechanisms underlying asthma pathogenesis, including the hot sought-after topic of microbiota, add-on therapies and the potential application of probiotics in the management of asthma.

| S-EPMC8123613 | biostudies-literature

Characterization of T2-Low and T2-High Asthma Phenotypes in Real-Life.

Project description:Asthma is a heterogeneous and complex condition characterized by chronic airway inflammation, which may be clinically stratified into three main phenotypes: type 2 (T2) low, T2-high allergic, and T2-high non-allergic asthma. This real-world study investigated whether phenotyping patients with asthma using non-invasive parameters could be feasible to characterize the T2-low and T2-high asthma phenotypes in clinical practice. This cross-sectional observational study involved asthmatic outpatients (n = 503) referring to the Severe Asthma Centre of the San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital. Participants were stratified according to the patterns of T2 inflammation and atopic sensitization. Among outpatients, 98 (19.5%) patients had T2-low asthma, 127 (25.2%) T2-high non-allergic, and 278 (55.3%) had T2-high allergic phenotype. In comparison to T2-low, allergic patients were younger (OR 0.945, p < 0.001) and thinner (OR 0.913, p < 0.001), had lower smoke exposure (OR 0.975, p < 0.001) and RV/TLC% (OR 0.950, p < 0.001), higher prevalence of asthma severity grade 5 (OR 2.236, p < 0.05), more frequent rhinitis (OR 3.491, p < 0.001) and chronic rhinosinusitis with (OR 2.650, p < 0.001) or without (OR 1.919, p < 0.05) nasal polyps, but less common arterial hypertension (OR 0.331, p < 0.001). T2-high non-allergic patients had intermediate characteristics. Non-invasive phenotyping of asthmatic patients is possible in clinical practice. Identifying characteristics in the three main asthma phenotypes could pave the way for further investigations on useful biomarkers for precision medicine.

| S-EPMC8615363 | biostudies-literature

A Transcriptomic Method to Determine Airway Immune Dysfunction in T2-High and T2-Low Asthma.

Project description:BackgroundType 2 (T2) inflammation drives airway dysfunction in many patients with asthma; yet, we lack a comprehensive understanding of the airway immune cell types and networks that sustain this inflammation. Moreover, defects in the airway immune system in patients with asthma without T2 inflammation are not established.ObjectivesTo determine the gene networks that sustain T2 airway inflammation in T2-high asthma and to explore the gene networks that characterize T2-low asthma.MethodsNetwork analysis of sputum cell transcriptome expression data from 84 subjects with asthma and 27 healthy control subjects was used to identify immune cell type-enriched networks that underlie asthma subgroups.ResultsSputum T2 gene expression was characterized by an immune cell network derived from multiple innate immune cells, including eosinophils, mast cells/basophils, and inflammatory dendritic cells. Clustering of subjects within this network stratified subjects into T2-high and T2-low groups, but it also revealed a subgroup of T2-high subjects with uniformly higher expression of the T2 network. These "T2-ultrahigh subjects" were characterized clinically by older age and more severe airflow obstruction and pathologically by a second T2 network derived from T2-skewed, CD11b+/CD103-/IRF4+ classical dendritic cells. Subjects with T2-low asthma were differentiated from healthy control subjects by lower expression of a cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell network, which was negatively correlated with body mass index and plasma IL-6 concentrations.ConclusionsPersistent airway T2 inflammation is a complex construct of innate and adaptive immunity gene expression networks that are variable across individuals with asthma and persist despite steroid treatment. Individuals with T2-low asthma exhibit an airway deficiency in cytotoxic T cells associated with obesity-driven inflammation.

| S-EPMC6376622 | biostudies-literature

A new era has begun: Treatment of atopic dermatitis with biologics.

Project description:The era of biologics for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) began in 2017 with the approval of dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to the α-subunit of the interleukin IL-4 receptor. Until then, only conventional immunosuppressants were available for systemic treatment, of which only cyclosporine is approved for the treatment of severe AD. In the meantime, the therapeutic landscape of AD has been changing rapidly, and additional biologics have been developed which target IL-13, the IL-31 receptor, OX40, and OX40L, among others. Many of these substances have already shown promising results in phase 1, 2, and in some cases also phase 3 trials. In June 2021, tralokinumab, an IL-13 antibody, has been approved in Europe for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD in adults. In addition to antibody-based therapies, "small molecules" that, e.g., inhibit Janus kinases enrich the armamentarium of systemic AD therapies. With all these agents, not only will many more targeted therapies become available, but also will the complex and heterogeneous pathophysiological processes of this disease be better understood.

| S-EPMC8439107 | biostudies-literature

"Real-life" management of patients with severe asthma in the biologics era: Can we do better?

Project description:BackgroundDiscrepancies exist between guidelines and real-life practice in severe asthma. Objectives: To establish profiles for severe asthma patients according to their maintenance therapies and identify unmet needs.Methods2432 French lung specialists and allergists were invited to participate in a severe asthma survey between March and April 2018. Retrospective data were collected using an electronic case report form developed by IQVIA.Results71 respiratory physicians and/or allergists participated in the study, providing data for 736 severe asthma patients. The annual mean rates of hospitalization and exacerbation in the previous year were 0.65 (SD = 0.5) and 2.25 (SD = 1.0), respectively. One hundred one (13.7%) patients were treated with oral steroids; the mean dosage regimen was 16.1 mg per day (SD = 11.2). ICS-LABA-LAMA triple inhaled therapy was reported for 288 patients (39%); 231 patients (31.4%) had one biologic in their maintenance treatment. Among patients hospitalized at least once in the previous year (n = 311), 89 (28.5%) were currently treated with biologics, and 61 (19.6%) with oral steroids. One hundred sixty-six patients with uncontrolled asthma and no current biologic therapy had data for "T2 status"; 78 (47%), 89 (53.6%) and 137 (82.5%) of them had treatment criteria respectively for an anti-IgE, anti-IL5-pathway or anti-IL-4/IL-13 pathway therapy; 22 (13.2%) were ineligible for any current biologic according to biomarkers.ConclusionOur study updated "real-life" therapeutic management data for severe asthma in France in 2018. We highlighted a need for improved patient-phenotyping. This work also gives a striking insight of the position of current and forthcoming biologics.

| S-EPMC7985558 | biostudies-literature

Asthma Patients Who Stop Asthma Biologics Have a Similar Risk of Asthma Exacerbations as Those Who Continue Asthma Biologics.

Project description:BackgroundThere is limited information about outcomes associated with stopping asthma biologics.ObjectiveTo compare outcomes in people who stopped or continued asthma biologics.MethodsWe identified a cohort of people with asthma who stopped or continued asthma biologics in the Optum Labs Database Warehouse, using a propensity matching method for case and control groups with the variables of age, sex, race, region, insurance, income, specialist access, Charlson comorbidity, specific medical conditions, pre-index exacerbation count, pre-index rescue inhaler pharmacy fills, and pre-index inhaled corticosteroid with or without long-acting β-agonist pharmacy fills. Primary outcome used to assess failure of stopping was an increase of 50% or more in the asthma exacerbation rate in the 6 months after discontinuing the biologic compared with the 6-month period before biologic initiation.ResultsAmong a cohort of 4960 asthma biologic users, 1249 were observed to stop use after 6 to 12 months of use. We identified a matched cohort of 1247 stoppers and 1247 people who continued biologic use for at least 18 months. In the first 6 months after stopping or sham stopping, 10.2% of stoppers and 9.5% of continuers had an increase of 50% or more in asthma exacerbations. We found a similar adjusted odds of failing among stoppers and continuers (odds ratio = 1.085; 95% confidence interval, 0.833-1.413).ConclusionsAn increase in asthma exacerbations is infrequently observed in people who stopped asthma biologics and was observed at similar rates as in matched controls who continued asthma biologics.

| S-EPMC8277704 | biostudies-literature

Role of Biologics in Asthma.

Project description:Patients with severe uncontrolled asthma have disproportionally high morbidity and healthcare utilization as compared with their peers with well-controlled disease. Although treatment options for these patients were previously limited, with unacceptable side effects, the emergence of biologic therapies for the treatment of asthma has provided promising targeted therapy for these patients. Biologic therapies target specific inflammatory pathways involved in the pathogenesis of asthma, particularly in patients with an endotype driven by type 2 (T2) inflammation. In addition to anti-IgE therapy that has improved outcomes in allergic asthma for more than a decade, three anti-IL-5 biologics and one anti-IL-4R biologic have recently emerged as promising treatments for T2 asthma. These targeted therapies have been shown to reduce asthma exacerbations, improve lung function, reduce oral corticosteroid use, and improve quality of life in appropriately selected patients. In addition to the currently approved biologic agents, several biologics targeting upstream inflammatory mediators are in clinical trials, with possible approval on the horizon. This article reviews the mechanism of action, indications, expected benefits, and side effects of each of the currently approved biologics for severe uncontrolled asthma and discusses promising therapeutic targets for the future.

| S-EPMC6835092 | biostudies-literature

Therapeutic New Era for Atopic Dermatitis: Part 1. Biologics.

Project description:Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory cutaneous disease driven by immune dysregulation and skin barrier dysfunction. We are currently experiencing a new era of understanding of the pathogenesis of AD and, as a consequence, a new era of innovation in therapeutics, including small molecules and biologic therapy. Recently, advances in translational research have challenged the traditional AD pathogenesis paradigm of AD being solely a Th2-dominant disease. Other immune pathways seem to play a role in the complex AD pathophysiology, although the clinical relevance of these additional immune pathway abnormalities is unclear. Type 1, type 22, and type 17 pathway activation (with related cytokines/chemokines) have been demonstrated in the skin and blood of AD patients. Type 2 (interleukin [IL]-4, IL-13), IL-31, and type 22 (IL-22) pathway cytokines are increased in AD acute lesions. IL-22 induces both an epidermal hyperplasia at the onset of acute AD and a marked increase in the terminal differentiation S100 genes. This understanding of pathogenesis corresponds to a historic increase in therapeutic development in AD. The extreme clinical heterogeneity and the chronic progression of AD establish the need for newer, safer, and more effective treatments, control the disease, and improve the quality of life of affected patients.

| S-EPMC7875213 | biostudies-literature

Selection of Biologics for Type 2-High Asthma.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6775871 | biostudies-literature