Dataset Information

Randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot Study of Neurocardiac Function in Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Undergoing Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback.

ABSTRACT: Background: Neurocardiac dysfunction worsens clinical outcome and increases mortality in stroke survivors. We hypothesized that heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback improves neurocardiac function by modulating autonomic nervous system activity after acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Methods: We randomly allocated (1:1) 48 acute ischaemic stroke patients to receive nine sessions of HRV- or sham biofeedback over 3 days in addition to comprehensive stroke unit care. Before and after the intervention patients were evaluated for HRV via standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN, primary outcome), root mean square of successive differences between normal heartbeats (RMSSD), a predominantly parasympathetic measure, and for sympathetic vasomotor and sudomotor function. Severity of autonomic symptoms was assessed via survey of autonomic symptom scale total impact score (TIS) at baseline and after 3 months. Results: We included 48 patients with acute ischaemic stroke [19 females, ages 65 (4.4), median (interquartile range)]. Treatment with HRV biofeedback increased HRV post intervention [SDNN: 43.5 (79.0) ms vs. 34.1 (45.0) ms baseline, p = 0.015; RMSSD: 46.0 (140.6) ms vs. 29.1 (52.2) ms baseline, p = 0.015] and alleviated autonomic symptoms after 3 months [TIS 3.5 (8.0) vs. 7.5 (7.0) baseline, p = 0.029], which was not seen after sham biofeedback (SDNN: p = 0.63, RMSSD: p = 0.65, TIS: 0.06). There were no changes in sympathetic vasomotor and sudomotor function (p = ns). Conclusions: Adding HRV biofeedback to standard stroke unit care led to improved neurocardiac function and sustained alleviation of autonomic symptoms after acute ischaemic stroke, which was likely mediated by a predominantly parasympathetic mechanism. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03865225.

SUBMITTER: Siepmann T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8187903 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Despite previous findings of therapeutic effects for heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) on asthma, it is not known whether HRVB can substitute either for controller or rescue medication, or whether it affects airway inflammation. Sixty-eight paid volunteer steroid naïve study participants with mild or moderate asthma were given 3 months of HRVB or a comparison condition consisting of EEG alpha biofeedback with relaxing music and relaxed paced breathing (EEG+), in a two-center trial. All participants received a month of intensive asthma education prior to randomization. Both treatment conditions produced similar significant improvements on the methacholine challenge test (MCT), asthma symptoms, and asthma quality of life (AQOL). MCT effects were of similar size to those of enhanced placebo procedures reported elsewhere, and were 65% of those of a course of a high-potency inhaled steroid budesonide given to a sub-group of participants following biofeedback training. Exhaled nitric oxide decreased significantly only in the HRVB group, 81% of the budesonide effect, but with no significant differences between groups. Participants reported becoming more relaxed during practice of both techniques. Administration of albuterol after biofeedback sessions produced a large improvement in pulmonary function test results, indicating that neither treatment normalized pulmonary function as a potent controller medication would have done. Impulse oscillometry showed increased upper airway (vocal cord) resistance during biofeedback periods in both groups. These data suggest that HRVB should not be considered an alternative to asthma controller medications (e.g., inhaled steroids), although both biofeedback conditions produced some beneficial effects, warranting further research, and suggesting potential complementary effects. Various hypotheses are presented to explain why HRVB effects on asthma appeared smaller in this study than in earlier studies. Clinical Trial Registration NCT02766374.

Project description:BackgroundPeople with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) frequently experience high levels of anxiety. Despite this, many clinical settings do not provide specialist ASD mental health services, and demand for professional support frequently outstrips supply. Across many sectors of health, investigators have explored digital health solutions to mitigate demand and extend the reach of professional practice beyond traditional clinical settings.ObjectiveThis critical appraisal and pilot feasibility study examines heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback as an approach to help young people with ASD to manage anxiety symptoms outside of formal settings. The aim is to explore the use of portable biofeedback devices to manage anxiety, while also highlighting the risks and benefits of this approach with this population.MethodsWe assessed the feasibility of using home-based HRV biofeedback for self-management of anxiety in young people with ASD. We adopted coproduction, involving people with ASD, to facilitate development of the study design. Next, a separate pilot with 20 participants with ASD (n=16, 80% male participants and n=4, 20% female participants, aged 13-24 years; IQ>70) assessed adoption and acceptability of HRV biofeedback devices for home use over a 12-week period. Data were collected from both carers and participants through questionnaires and interviews; participants also provided single-lead electrocardiogram recordings as well as daily reports through smartphone on adoption and use of their device.ResultsPre-post participant questionnaires indicated a significant reduction in anxiety in children (t6=2.55; P=.04; Cohen d=0.99) as well as adults (t7=3.95; P=.006; Cohen d=0.54). Participant age was significantly negatively correlated with all HRV variables at baseline, namely high-frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV: P=.02), the root mean square of successive differences in normal heartbeat contractions (RMSSD: P=.02) and the variability of normal-to-normal interbeat intervals (SDNN: P=.04). At follow-up, only SDNN was significantly negatively correlated with age (P=.05). Levels of ASD symptoms were positively correlated with heart rate both before (P=.04) and after the intervention (P=.01). The majority (311/474, 65.6%) of reports from participants indicated that the devices helped when used. Difficulties with the use of some devices and problems with home testing of HRV were noted. These initial findings are discussed within the context of the strengths and challenges of remotely delivering a biofeedback intervention for people with ASD.ConclusionsHRV biofeedback devices have shown promise in this pilot study. There is now a need for larger evaluation of biofeedback to determine which delivery methods achieve the greatest effect for people with ASD.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04955093; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04955093.

Dataset Information

Randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot Study of Neurocardiac Function in Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Undergoing Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets