Statistical Evaluation of Different Mathematical Models for Diffusion Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer Xenografts in Mice.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose
To evaluate fitting quality and repeatability of four mathematical models for diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) during tumor progression in mouse xenograft model of prostate cancer.Methods
Human prostate cancer cells (PC-3) were implanted subcutaneously in right hind limbs of 11 immunodeficient mice. Tumor growth was followed by weekly DWI examinations using a 7T MR scanner. Additional DWI examination was performed after repositioning following the fourth DWI examination to evaluate short term repeatability. DWI was performed using 15 and 12 b-values in the ranges of 0-500 and 0-2000 s/mm2, respectively. Corrected Akaike information criteria and F-ratio were used to evaluate fitting quality of each model (mono-exponential, stretched exponential, kurtosis, and bi-exponential).Results
Significant changes were observed in DWI data during the tumor growth, indicated by ADCm, ADCs, and ADCk. Similar results were obtained using low as well as high b-values. No marked changes in model preference were present between the weeks 1-4. The parameters of the mono-exponential, stretched exponential, and kurtosis models had smaller confidence interval and coefficient of repeatability values than the parameters of the bi-exponential model.Conclusion
Stretched exponential and kurtosis models showed better fit to DWI data than the mono-exponential model and presented with good repeatability.
SUBMITTER: Merisaari H
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8188898 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in peripheral zone prostate cancer (PZ PCa) detection. METHODS:Fifty-six patients with histologically proven PZ PCa who underwent DWI-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using 21 b-values (0-4500 s/mm2) were included. The mean signal intensities of the regions of interest (ROIs) placed in benign PZs and cancerous tissues on DWI images were fitted using mono-exponential, bi-exponential, stretched-exponential, and kurtosis models. The b-values were divided into four ranges: 0-1000, 0-2000, 0-3200, and 0-4500 s/mm2, grouped as A, B, C, and D, respectively. ADC, <D>, D*, f, DDC, ?, Dapp, and Kapp were estimated for each group. The adjusted coefficient of determination (R2) was calculated to measure goodness-of-fit. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters. RESULTS:All parameters except D* showed significant differences between cancerous tissues and benign PZs in each group. The area under the curve values (AUCs) of ADC were comparable in groups C and D (p = 0.980) and were significantly higher than those in groups A and B (p< 0.05 for all). The AUCs of ADC and Kapp in groups B and C were similar (p = 0.07 and p = 0.954), and were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). The AUCs of ADC in group D was slightly higher than Kapp (p = 0.002), and both were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS:ADC derived from conventional mono-exponential high b-value (3200 s/mm2) models is an optimal parameter for PZ PCa detection.
| S-EPMC5310778 | biostudies-other
Project description:Purpose To develop a multicompartmental signal model for whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apply it to study the diffusion properties of normal tissue and metastatic prostate cancer bone lesions in vivo. Materials and Methods This prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03440554) included 139 men with prostate cancer (mean age, 70 years ± 9 [SD]). Multicompartmental models with two to four tissue compartments were fit to DWI data from whole-body scans to determine optimal compartmental diffusion coefficients. Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and model-fitting residuals were calculated to quantify model complexity and goodness of fit. Diffusion coefficients for the optimal model (having lowest BIC) were used to compute compartmental signal-contribution maps. The signal intensity ratio (SIR) of bone lesions to normal-appearing bone was measured on these signal-contribution maps and on conventional DWI scans and compared using paired t tests (α = .05). Two-sample t tests (α = .05) were used to compare compartmental signal fractions between lesions and normal-appearing bone. Results Lowest BIC was observed from the four-compartment model, with optimal compartmental diffusion coefficients of 0, 1.1 × 10-3, 2.8 × 10-3, and >3.0 ×10-2 mm2/sec. Fitting residuals from this model were significantly lower than from conventional apparent diffusion coefficient mapping (P < .001). Bone lesion SIR was significantly higher on signal-contribution maps of model compartments 1 and 2 than on conventional DWI scans (P < .008). The fraction of signal from compartments 2, 3, and 4 was also significantly different between metastatic bone lesions and normal-appearing bone tissue (P ≤ .02). Conclusion The four-compartment model best described whole-body diffusion properties. Compartmental signal contributions from this model can be used to examine prostate cancer bone involvement. Keywords: Whole-Body MRI, Diffusion-weighted Imaging, Restriction Spectrum Imaging, Diffusion Signal Model, Bone Metastases, Prostate Cancer Clinical trial registration no. NCT03440554 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023 See also commentary by Margolis in this issue.
| S-EPMC9896230 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and purposeIntramedullary high signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging was frequently observed in patients with CSM, although this finding does not well correlate with severity or prognosis of CSM. Instead of this nonquantitative information, another measure for CSM is desired. The work was focused primarily on assessing the relationships between ADC values and clinical and radiologic severity for the diagnosis of CSM.Materials and methodsThe relationship between ADC values measured in the spinal cord at 322 intervertebral levels of 66 patients and clinical factors were analyzed.ResultsADC values in the spinal cord significantly increased with the degree of spinal cord compression and decreased with time after decompression surgery. Patients with higher ADC values had lower preoperative JOA scores and tended to show poorer clinical recovery.ConclusionsADC values appear to indicate the severity of spinal cord compression and clinical recovery after decompression surgery, so spondylotic myelopathy may partly be predicted preoperatively by using ADC values.
| S-EPMC7964806 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To evaluate readout-segmented echoplanar (rsEPI) diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate compared to the established single-shot echoplanar imaging (ssEPI) sequence.One hundred ten consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer underwent mp prostate MRI using both, the ssEPI and the rsEPI DWI sequence. For an objective assessment, delineation of the prostate shape on both DWI sequences was compared to T2-weighted images by measuring organ diameters. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, image contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared between the 2 sequences on a region-of-interest-based analysis. Diagnostic accuracy for quantitative ADC-values was calculated. Histopathology from MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy was used as reference standard. For a subjective assessment, 2 independent readers visually assessed image quality of both sequences using Likert-scales.Delineation of the prostate shape was more accurate with rsEPI compared to ssEPI. ADC values in target lesions were not significantly different but significantly higher in the surrounding normal prostatic tissue of the transition zone. CNR was comparable between ssEPI and rsEPI. Sensitivity and specificity were good for both sequences with 84/84% and 82/73% with a Youden selected cut-off of ADC = 0.971*10 mm/s for rsEPI and 1.017*10 mm/s for ssEPI. Anatomic artifacts were significantly less and SNR was lower on rsEPI compared to ssEPI in the subjective analysis.Delineation of the prostate shape was more accurate with rsEPI DWI than with ssEPI DWI with less anatomic artifacts and higher subjective SNR and image quality on rsEPI DW images. Diagnostic ability of quantitative ADC-values was not significantly different between the 2 sequences. Thus, rsEPI DWI might be more suitable for prostate MRI with regard to MRI-guided targeted biopsy and therapy planning.
| S-EPMC6709253 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The importance of Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis have been widely handled in literature. In the last decade, due to the mono-exponential model limitations, several studies investigated non-Gaussian DWI models and their utility in PCa diagnosis. Since their results were often inconsistent and conflicting, we performed a systematic review of studies from 2012 examining the most commonly used Non-Gaussian DWI models for PCa detection and characterization. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the ability of each Non-Gaussian model to detect PCa lesions and distinguish between low and intermediate/high grade lesions. Weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and the heterogeneity was estimated using the I2 statistic. 29 studies were selected for the systematic review, whose results showed inconsistence and an unclear idea about the actual usefulness and the added value of the Non-Gaussian model parameters. 12 studies were considered in the meta-analyses, which showed statistical significance for several non-Gaussian parameters for PCa detection, and to a lesser extent for PCa characterization. Our findings showed that Non-Gaussian model parameters may potentially play a role in the detection and characterization of PCa but further studies are required to identify a standardized DWI acquisition protocol for PCa diagnosis.
| S-EPMC6856159 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is commonly used to detect prostate cancer, and a major clinical challenge is differentiating aggressive from indolent disease.PurposeTo compare 14 site-specific parametric fitting implementations applied to the same dataset of whole-mount pathologically validated DWI to test the hypothesis that cancer differentiation varies with different fitting algorithms.Study typeProspective.PopulationThirty-three patients prospectively imaged prior to prostatectomy.Field strength/sequence3 T, field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot DWI sequence.AssessmentDatasets, including a noise-free digital reference object (DRO), were distributed to the 14 teams, where locally implemented DWI parameter maps were calculated, including mono-exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (MEADC), kurtosis (K), diffusion kurtosis (DK), bi-exponential diffusion (BID), pseudo-diffusion (BID*), and perfusion fraction (F). The resulting parametric maps were centrally analyzed, where differentiation of benign from cancerous tissue was compared between DWI parameters and the fitting algorithms with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC).Statistical testLevene's test, P < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons was considered statistically significant.ResultsThe DRO results indicated minimal discordance between sites. Comparison across sites indicated that K, DK, and MEADC had significantly higher prostate cancer detection capability (AUC range = 0.72-0.76, 0.76-0.81, and 0.76-0.80 respectively) as compared to bi-exponential parameters (BID, BID*, F) which had lower AUC and greater between site variation (AUC range = 0.53-0.80, 0.51-0.81, and 0.52-0.80 respectively). Post-processing parameters also affected the resulting AUC, moving from, for example, 0.75 to 0.87 for MEADC varying cluster size.Data conclusionWe found that conventional diffusion models had consistent performance at differentiating prostate cancer from benign tissue. Our results also indicated that post-processing decisions on DWI data can affect sensitivity and specificity when applied to radiological-pathological studies in prostate cancer.Level of evidence1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
| S-EPMC9095769 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo retrospectively determine the accuracy of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for identifying cancer in the prostate peripheral zone (PZ) and to assess the accuracy of tumor volume measurements made with T2-weighted imaging and combined T2-weighted and DW MR imaging by using surgical pathologic examination as the reference standard.Materials and methodsThe institutional review board issued a waiver of informed consent for this HIPAA-compliant study. Forty-two patients underwent endorectal MR at 1.5 T before undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer and had at least one PZ tumor larger than 0.1 cm(3) at surgical pathologic examination. On T2-weighted images, an experienced radiologist outlined suspected PZ tumors. Two apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) cutoff values were identified by using the Youden index and published literature. Image cluster analysis was performed on voxels within the suspected tumor regions. Associations between volume measurements from imaging and from pathologic examination were assessed by using concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs). The sensitivity and specificity of ADCs for identifying malignant PZ voxels were calculated.ResultsIn identifying malignant voxels, respective ADC cutoff values of 0.0014 and 0.0016 mm(2)/sec yielded sensitivity of 82% and 95% and specificity of 85% and 65%, respectively. Sixty PZ cancer lesions larger than 0.1 cm(3) were found at pathologic examination; 43 were detected by the radiologist. CCCs between imaging and pathologic tumor volume measurements were 0.36 for T2-weighted imaging, and 0.46 and 0.60 for combined T2-weighted and DW MR imaging with ADC cutoffs of 0.0014 and 0.0016 mm(2)/sec, respectively; the CCC of combined T2-weighted and DW MR imaging (ADC cutoff, 0.0016 mm(2)/sec) was significantly higher (P = .006) than that of T2-weighted imaging alone.ConclusionAdding DW MR to T2-weighted imaging can significantly improve the accuracy of prostate PZ tumor volume measurement.Supplemental materialhttp://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/252/2/449/DC1.
| S-EPMC2753786 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Linear regression is a parametric model which is ubiquitous in scientific analysis. The classical setup where the observations and responses, i.e., (xi , yi ) pairs, are Euclidean is well studied. The setting where yi is manifold valued is a topic of much interest, motivated by applications in shape analysis, topic modeling, and medical imaging. Recent work gives strategies for max-margin classifiers, principal components analysis, and dictionary learning on certain types of manifolds. For parametric regression specifically, results within the last year provide mechanisms to regress one real-valued parameter, xi ? R, against a manifold-valued variable, yi ? . We seek to substantially extend the operating range of such methods by deriving schemes for multivariate multiple linear regression -a manifold-valued dependent variable against multiple independent variables, i.e., f : Rn ? . Our variational algorithm efficiently solves for multiple geodesic bases on the manifold concurrently via gradient updates. This allows us to answer questions such as: what is the relationship of the measurement at voxel y to disease when conditioned on age and gender. We show applications to statistical analysis of diffusion weighted images, which give rise to regression tasks on the manifold GL(n)/O(n) for diffusion tensor images (DTI) and the Hilbert unit sphere for orientation distribution functions (ODF) from high angular resolution acquisition. The companion open-source code is available on nitrc.org/projects/riem_mglm.
| S-EPMC4288036 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo evaluate the use of diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) and volume measurements for early monitoring of antiangiogenic therapy in an experimental tumor model.Materials and methods23 athymic nude rats, bearing human colon carcinoma xenografts (HT-29) were examined before and after 6 days of treatment with regorafenib (n = 12) or placebo (n = 11) in a clinical 3-Tesla MRI. For DW-MRI, a single-shot EPI sequence with 9 b-values (10-800 s/mm2) was used. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was calculated voxelwise and its median value over a region of interest, covering the entire tumor, was defined as the tumor ADC. Tumor volume was determined using T2-weighted images. ADC and volume changes between first and second measurement were evaluated as classifiers by a receiver-operator-characteristic (ROC) analysis individually and combined using Fisher's linear discriminant analysis (FLDA).ResultsAll ADCs and volumes are stated as median±standard deviation. Tumor ADC increased significantly in the therapy group (0.76±0.09×10(-3) mm2/s to 0.90±0.12×10(-3) mm2/s; p<0.001), with significantly higher changes of tumor ADC than in the control group (0.10±0.11×10(-3) mm2/s vs. 0.03±0.09×10(-3) mm2/s; p = 0.027). Tumor volume increased significantly in both groups (therapy: 347.8±449.1 to 405.3±823.6 mm3; p = 0.034; control: 219.7±79.5 to 443.7±141.5 mm3; p<0.001), however, the therapy group showed significantly reduced tumor growth (33.30±47.30% vs. 96.43±31.66%; p<0.001). Area under the curve and accuracy of the ADC-based ROC analysis were 0.773 and 78.3%; and for the volume change 0.886 and 82.6%. The FLDA approach yielded an AUC of 0.985 and an accuracy of 95.7%.ConclusionsRegorafenib therapy significantly increased tumor ADC after 6 days of treatment and also significantly reduced tumor growth. However, ROC analyses using each parameter individually revealed a lack of accuracy in discriminating between therapy and control group. The combination of both parameters using FLDA substantially improved diagnostic accuracy, thus highlighting the potential of multi-parameter MRI as an imaging biomarker for non-invasive early tumor therapy monitoring.
| S-EPMC4164617 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is valuable in the screening, diagnosis, and grading of breast lesions. However, conventional DWI (C-DWI) is prone to chemical shift and distortion. ZOOMit DWI (Z-DWI), as an advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique, applies two spatially selective parallel excitation pulses to focus sampling in the hope of obtaining more valuable information. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the image quality and feasibility of Z-DWI with those of C-DWI in breast lesions.MethodsThe study included 51 patients with breast lesions who underwent breast MRI from May 2021 to February 2022. All patients received Z-DWI and C-DWI sequences, with b values selected as 50 and 800 s/mm2 (Z-DWIb50, Z-DWIb800, C-DWIb50, and C-DWIb800). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values based on Z-DWI and C-DWI were calculated. For qualitative analysis, four image quality parameters were selected and assessed on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = poor and 4 = excellent). For quantitative analysis, ADC, relative ADC (rADC), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and tumor-to-parenchymal contrast (TPC) values were selected for comparison.ResultsZ-DWI had higher scores compared to C-DWI in terms of lesion conspicuity, anatomical details, distortion and artifacts, and overall image quality (P<0.05). Meanwhile, the agreement between the two readers was reasonably good [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) range, 0.360-0.881]. The SNR of Z-DWIb800 was better than that of C-DWIb800 (P<0.001). The Z-DWI ADC and rADC values of breast lesions were statistically significantly lower than those of C-DWI (mean ADC: P<0.001; rADC; P=0.005).ConclusionsZ-DWI sequences were shown to have superior image quality. The ADC map of Z-DWI is more conducive to the imaging evaluation of breast lesions.
| S-EPMC10722069 | biostudies-literature