Association of Preadmission Statin Use and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Yu SS
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8193232 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:INTRODUCTION: Statins reduce risk of cardiovascular events and have beneficial pleiotropic effects; both may reduce mortality in critically ill patients. We examined whether statin use was associated with risk of death in general intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODS: Cohort study of 12,483 critically ill patients > 45 yrs of age with a first-time admission to one of three highly specialized ICUs within the Aarhus University Hospital network, Denmark, between 2001 and 2007. Statin users were identified through population-based prescription databases. We computed cumulative mortality rates 0-30 days and 31-365 days after ICU admission and mortality rate ratios (MRRs), using Cox regression analysis controlling for potential confounding factors (demographics, use of other cardiovascular drugs, comorbidity, markers of social status, diagnosis, and surgery). RESULTS: 1882 (14.3%) ICU patients were current statin users. Statin users had a reduced risk of death within 30 days of ICU admission [users: 22.1% vs. non-users 25.0%; adjusted MRR = 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69 to 0.86)]. Statin users also had a reduced risk of death within one year after admission to the ICU [users: 36.4% vs. non-users 39.9%; adjusted MRR = 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.86)]. Reduced risk of death associated with current statin use remained robust in various subanalyses and in an analysis using propensity score matching. Former use of statins and current use of non-statin lipid-lowering drugs were not associated with reduced risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: Preadmission statin use was associated with reduced risk of death following intensive care. The associations seen could be a pharmacological effect of statins, but unmeasured differences in characteristics of statin users and non-users cannot be entirely ruled out.
| S-EPMC2887131 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The effect of statin therapy on mortality in critically ill patients is controversial, with some studies suggesting a benefit and others suggesting no benefit or even potential harm. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between statin therapy during intensive care unit (ICU) admission and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients.This was a nested cohort study within two randomised controlled trials conducted in a tertiary care ICU. All 763 patients who participated in the two trials were included in this study. Of these, 107 patients (14%) received statins during their ICU stay. The primary endpoint was all-cause ICU and hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints included the development of sepsis and severe sepsis during the ICU stay, the ICU length of stay, the hospital length of stay, and the duration of mechanical ventilation. Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for clinically and statistically relevant variables.Statin therapy was associated with a reduction in hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.99). Statin therapy was associated with lower hospital mortality in the following groups: patients >58 years of age (aOR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.97), those with an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score >22 (aOR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.31-0.96), diabetic patients (aOR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.90), patients on vasopressor therapy (aOR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.97), those admitted with severe sepsis (aOR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.66), patients with creatinine ? 100 ?mol/L (aOR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.51), and patients with GCS ? 9 (aOR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.71). When stratified by statin dose, the mortality reduction was mainly observed with statin equipotent doses ? 40 mg of simvastatin (aOR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.28-1.00). Mortality reduction was observed with simvastatin (aOR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.81) but not with atorvastatin (aOR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.84-1.46). Statin therapy was not associated with a difference in any of the secondary outcomes.Statin therapy during ICU stay was associated with a reduction in all-cause hospital mortality. This association was especially noted in high-risk subgroups. This potential benefit needs to be validated in a randomised, controlled trial.
| S-EPMC3199769 | biostudies-other
Project description:RATIONALE:Delirium is common in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and is a predictor of worse outcomes and neuroinflammation is a possible mechanism. The antiinflammatory actions of statins may reduce delirium. OBJECTIVES:To determine whether critically ill patients receiving statin therapy had a reduced risk of delirium than those not on statins. METHODS:A prospective cohort analysis of data from consecutive ICU patients admitted to a UK mixed medical and surgical critical care unit between August 2011 and February 2012; the Confusion Assessment Method for ICU was used to determine the days each patient was assessed as being free of delirium during ICU admission. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Delirium-free days, daily administration of statins, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were recorded. Four hundred and seventy consecutive critical care patients were followed, of whom 151 patients received statins. Using random-effects multivariable logistic regression, statin administration the previous evening was associated with the patient being assessed as free of delirium (odds ratio, 2.28; confidence interval, 1.01-5.13; P < 0.05) and with lower CRP (? = -0.52; P < 0.01) the following day. When the association between statin and being assessed as free of delirium was controlled for CRP, the effect size became nonsignificant (odds ratio, 1.56; confidence interval, 0.64-3.79; P = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS:Ongoing statin therapy is associated with a lower daily risk of delirium in critically ill patients. An ongoing clinical trial, informed by this study, is investigating if statins are a potential therapy for delirium in the critically ill.
| S-EPMC3974585 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLactate is a robust prognostic marker for the outcome of critically ill patients. Several small studies reported that metformin users have higher lactate levels at ICU admission without a concomitant increase in mortality. However, this has not been investigated in a larger cohort. We aimed to determine whether the association between lactate levels around ICU admission and mortality is different in metformin users compared to metformin nonusers.MethodsThis cohort study included patients admitted to ICUs in northern Denmark between January 2010 and August 2017 with any circulating lactate measured around ICU admission, which was defined as 12 h before until 6 h after admission. The association between the mean of the lactate levels measured during this period and 30-day mortality was determined for metformin users and nonusers by modelling restricted cubic splines obtained from a Cox regression model.ResultsOf 37,293 included patients, 3183 (9%) used metformin. The median (interquartile range) lactate level was 1.8 (1.2-3.2) in metformin users and 1.6 (1.0-2.7) mmol/L in metformin nonusers. Lactate levels were strongly associated with mortality for both metformin users and nonusers. However, the association of lactate with mortality was different for metformin users, with a lower mortality rate in metformin users than in nonusers when admitted with similar lactate levels. This was observed over the whole range of lactate levels, and consequently, the relation of lactate with mortality was shifted rightwards for metformin users.ConclusionIn this large observational cohort of critically ill patients, early lactate levels were strongly associated with mortality. Irrespective of the degree of hyperlactataemia, similar lactate levels were associated with a lower mortality rate in metformin users compared with metformin nonusers. Therefore, lactate levels around ICU admission should be interpreted according to metformin use.
| S-EPMC7098407 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThis research aims to explore the impact of serum phosphate on the mortality of critically ill patients.DesignA retrospective large cohort study.SettingOur data were extracted from a publicly accessible database named 'Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care Database III'.Participants27 131 patients were included by clear definitions of selection and exclusion criteria.InterventionsWe used initial phosphate at admission as a design variable. Patients were divided into six groups with different serum phosphate levels and five groups at different intensive care unit (ICU) departments.Primary and secondary outcomes28-day and 90-day mortality were primary outcomes. All-cause mortality and length of stay ICU were secondary outcomes.ResultsPatients with very-high-normal serum phosphate, hypophosphataemia and hyperphosphataemia had worse outcomes. And the relationship between serum phosphate and the probability of 28-day or 90-day mortality had a linear relationship. After adjustment for potential confounders, hypophosphataemia and hyperphosphataemia were not significantly associated with 28-day or 90-day mortality. Nevertheless, at the medical ICU, hyperphosphataemia was associated with increased 28-day or 90-day mortality (HR=0.64, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.84, p=0.0017; HR=0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.91, p=0.0067, respectively), using group 2 (≥2.5 mg/dL and <3.0 mg/dL) as the reference group.ConclusionsPatients with very-high-normal serum phosphate also had worse outcomes, it might be necessary to re-evaluate the definitions of the normal reference range for serum phosphate. Hypophosphataemia and hyperphosphataemia are not the independent risk factors of 28-day or 90-day ICU mortality, which leads us to consider whether phosphate monitoring is not a necessary measure in critically ill patients. But hyperphosphataemia was associated with increased 28-day or 90-day mortality at the medical ICU, which emphasises the potential importance of early diagnosis and treatment of hyperphosphataemia for the patients who were admitted to the medical ICU.
| S-EPMC8422318 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTo further identify the association of the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index with the risk of mortality among critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched for relevant studies up to February 2, 2024. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and ICU mortality. The secondary outcomes were 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and 1-year mortality. The hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined to evaluate the associations between the TyG index and the above endpoints. All the statistical analyses were performed with STATA 15.0 software.ResultsTen studies involving 22,694 patients were included. The pooled results demonstrated that an elevated TyG index indicated an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.41-2.18, P < .001), ICU mortality (HR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.33-1.74, P < .001), 30-day mortality (HR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.02-2.19, P = .037), 90-day mortality (HR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.01-2.00, P = .043), and 1-year mortality (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.11-1.28, P < .001). Subgroup analysis for in-hospital mortality and ICU mortality based on sex, age, body mass index and hypertension showed similar results. However, subgroup analysis stratified by diabetes mellitus (DM) revealed that the associations of the TyG index with in-hospital mortality (HR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.30-3.78, P = .004) and ICU mortality (HR = 1.93, 95% CI: 0.95-3.94, P = .070) were observed only among patients without DM.ConclusionThe TyG index was significantly associated with mortality among critically ill patients without DM, and an elevated TyG index predicted an increased risk of mortality.
| S-EPMC11332756 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe World Health Organization guidelines did not make a recommendation on use of remdesivir based on disease severity. Little is known regarding effectiveness of remdesivir in critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. This has led to a state of dilemma for doctors leaving them skeptical of whether they should continue to recommend the drug or not.Materials and methodsA systematic search adhering to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted from inception until February 20, 2020. Electronic bibliographic databases (PubMed, Cochrane database, Scopus, Embase) were included. Using dichotomous data for select values, the unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated applying Mantel Haenszel (M-H) using random-effects model. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality in ventilated and non-ventilated patients.ResultsThe Remdesivir arm was associated with similar rates of 28-day all-cause mortality (OR: 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80 - 1.08; P = 0.33). Remdesivir was not found to be favorable for ventilated patients. Non ventilated COVID-19 patients showed a significant lower in-hospital mortality rate as compared with patients requiring mechanical ventilatory support (OR: 6.86, 95% CI: 5.39 - 268.74; P <0.0001).ConclusionNon-ventilated patients were associated with significant lower all-cause mortality rates. Prudent use of remdesivir is recommended in critically ill COVID-19 patients.
| S-EPMC8511372 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is related to high mortality and morbidity. There are no proven therapeutic measures however, to improve the clinical course of ARDS, except using low tidal volume ventilation. Metformin is known to have pleiotropic effects including anti-inflammatory activity. We hypothesized that pre-admission metformin might alter the progress of ARDS among intensive care unit (ICU) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study from January 1, 2005, to April 30, 2005 of patients who were admitted to the medical ICU at Seoul National University Hospital because of ARDS, and reviewed ARDS patients with DM. Metformin use was defined as prescribed within 3-month pre-admission.ResultsOf 558 patients diagnosed with ARDS, 128 (23.3%) patients had diabetes and 33 patients were treated with metformin monotherapy or in combination with other antidiabetic medications. Demographic characteristics, cause of ARDS, and comorbid conditions (except chronic kidney disease) were not different between metformin users and nonusers. Several severity indexes of ARDS were similar in both groups. The 30-day mortality was 42.42% in metformin users and 55.32% in metformin nonusers. On multivariable regression analysis, use of metformin was not significantly related to a reduced 30-day mortality (adjusted β-coefficient, -0.19; 95% confidence interval, -1.76 to 1.39; p=0.816). Propensity score-matched analyses showed similar results.ConclusionPre-admission metformin use was not associated with reduced 30-day mortality among ARDS patients with DM in our medical ICU.
| S-EPMC5526958 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThis research aims to explore the association between serum osmolarity and mortality in patients who are critically ill with specific categories of disease.DesignA retrospective cohort study.Setting and participantsData were extracted from an online database named 'Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II'. 16?598 patients were included.MethodsPatients were divided into six disease subgroups based on the diagnosis at admission: cardiac, cerebral, vascular, gastrointestinal, respiratory and non-respiratory. The association between maximum osmolarity (osmolaritymax) and hospital mortality in each subgroup was evaluated using osmolaritymax as a design variable (six levels).ResultsAnalysis of the 16?598 patients revealed a 'U'-shaped relationship between osmolarity and mortality with a threshold of 300?mmoL/L. For patients with non-respiratory disease, both hypo-osmolarity and hyperosmolaritymax were associated with increased mortality, with the OR increasing from osmolaritymax level 3 (OR: 1.98, 95%?CI 1.69 to 2.33, p<0.001) to level 6 (OR: 4.45, 95%?CI 3.58 to 5.53, p<0.001), using level 2 (290-309?mmoL/L) as the reference group. For patients with respiratory disease, however, neither hypo-osmolarity nor hyperosmolaritymax was significantly associated with mortality (levels 1 to 5) except for extreme hyperosmolaritymax (?340?mmoL/L, OR: 2.03, 95%?CI 1.20 to 3.42, p=0.007). ORs of mortality in the other four subgroups (cardiac, cerebral, vascular, gastrointestinal) were similar, with OR progressively increasing from level 3 to 6. In all six subgroups, vasopressin use was consistently associated with increased mortality.ConclusionsHyperosmolarity is associated with increased mortality in patients who are critically ill with cardiac, cerebral, vascular and gastrointestinal admission diagnoses, with thresholds at 300?mmoL/L. For patients with respiratory disease, however, no significant association was detected.
| S-EPMC5623375 | biostudies-literature
Project description:INTRODUCTION: Metformin has anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic effects that may improve the outcome of critical illness, but clinical data are limited. We examined the impact of preadmission metformin use on mortality among intensive care unit (ICU) patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We conducted this population-based cohort study among all persons admitted to the 17 ICUs in Northern Denmark (population approximately 1.8 million). We focused on all patients with type 2 diabetes who were admitted to the ICUs between January 2005 and December 2011. Through individual-level linkage of population-based medical databases, type 2 diabetes was identified using a previously validated algorithm including hospital diagnoses, filled prescriptions for anti-diabetic drugs, and elevated HbA1c levels. Metformin use was identified by filled prescriptions within 90 days before admission. Covariates included surgery, preadmission morbidity, diabetes duration, and concurrent drug use. We computed 30-day mortality and hazard ratios (HRs) of death using Cox regression adjusted for covariates, both overall and after propensity score matching. RESULTS: We included 7,404 adult type 2 diabetes patients, representing 14.0% of 52,964 adult patients admitted to the ICUs. Among type 2 diabetes patients, 1,073 (14.5%) filled a prescription for metformin as monotherapy within 90 days before admission and 1,335 (18.0%) received metformin in combination with other anti-diabetic drugs. Thirty-day mortality was 17.6% among metformin monotherapy users, 17.9% among metformin combination therapy users, and 25.0% among metformin non-users. The adjusted HRs were 0.80 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69, 0.94) for metformin monotherapy users and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.95) for metformin combination therapy users, compared to non-users. Propensity-score-matched analyses yielded the same results. The association was evident across most subgroups of medical and surgical ICU patients, but most pronounced in elderly patients and in patients with well-controlled diabetes. Former metformin use was not associated with decreased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Preadmission metformin use was associated with reduced 30-day mortality among medical and surgical intensive care patients with type 2 diabetes.
| S-EPMC4057514 | biostudies-other