Early changes in the circulating T cells are associated with clinical outcomes after PD-L1 blockade by durvalumab in advanced NSCLC patients.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Naidus E
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8195930 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:In 2016 and 2017, monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-L1, including atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab, were approved by the FDA for the treatment of multiple advanced cancers. And many other anti-PD-L1 antibodies are under clinical trials. Recently, the crystal structures of PD-L1 in complex with BMS-936559 and avelumab have been determined, revealing details of the antigen-antibody interactions. However, it is still unknown how atezolizumab and durvalumab specifically recognize PD-L1, although this is important for investigating novel binding sites on PD-L1 targeted by other therapeutic antibodies for the design and improvement of anti-PD-L1 agents. Here, we report the crystal structures of PD-L1 in complex with atezolizumab and durvalumab to elucidate the precise epitopes involved and the structural basis for PD-1/PD-L1 blockade by these antibodies. A comprehensive comparison of PD-L1 interactions with anti-PD-L1 antibodies provides a better understanding of the mechanism of PD-L1 blockade as well as new insights into the rational design of improved anti-PD-L1 therapeutics.
| S-EPMC5514103 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundProgrammed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade immunotherapies have changed the landscape of cancer therapy. However, the main limitation of these therapies is the lack of definitively predictive biomarkers to predict treatment response. Whether PD-L1 expression on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is associated with the clinical outcomes of immunotherapy remains to be extensively investigated.Materials and methodsOne hundred fifty-five patients with different advanced cancers were enrolled in this study and treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies. Using the Pep@MNPs method, CTCs were isolated and enumerated. The PD-L1 expression levels were analyzed by an immunofluorescence assay for semiquantitative assessment with four categories (negative, low, medium, and high).ResultsPrior to immunotherapy, 81.93% (127/155) of patients had PD-L1-positive CTCs, and 71.61% (111/155) had at least one PD-L1-high CTC. The group with PD-L1-positive CTCs had a higher disease control rate (DCR) (71.56%, 91/127), with a DCR of only 39.29% (11/28) for the remaining individuals (p = .001). The objective response rate and DCR in PD-L1-high patients were higher than those in the other patients (32.44% vs. 13.64%, p = .018 and 75.68% vs. 40.91%, p < .0001, respectively). The reduction in the counts and ratios of PD-L1-positive CTCs and PD-L1-high CTCs reflected a beneficial response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Furthermore, patients with PD-L1-high CTCs had significantly longer progression-free survival (4.9 vs. 2.2 months, p < .0001) and overall survival (16.1 vs. 9.0 months, p = .0235) than those without PD-L1-high CTCs.ConclusionThe PD-L1 level on CTCs may serve as a clinically actionable biomarker for immunotherapy, and its dynamic changes could predict the therapeutic response.Implications for practiceThis study was designed to investigate the role of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on circulating tumor cells in predicting and monitoring response to programmed death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 blockade immunotherapies in patients with advanced cancer. The results of the study showed that PD-L1-high-expression circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were both a predictive biomarker and a prognostic factor in patients with advanced cancer treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies. These observations suggest that PD-L1 level on CTCs is a potential clinical biomarker for immunotherapy.
| S-EPMC8649012 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Tumor PD-L1 levels have predictive value in PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade therapies, yet biopsies can only provide baseline information. Whether PD-L1 expression on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) could serve as an alternative biomarker is of great interest. Design: We established an immunofluorescence assay for semi-quantitative assessment of the PD-L1 expression levels on CTCs with four categories (PD-L1negative, PD-L1low, PD-L1medium and PD-L1high). 35 patients with different advanced gastrointestinal tumors were enrolled in a phase 1 trial of a PD-1 inhibitor, IBI308. The CTC numeration and the PD-L1 expression levels were analyzed. Results: Prior the treatment of IBI308, 97% (34/35) patients had CTCs, ranging from1 to 70 (median 7). 74% (26/35) had PD-L1positive CTCs, and 60% (21/35) had at least one PD-L1high CTCs. The disease control (DC) rate in PD-L1high patients (48%) is much higher than the others (14%). The group with at least 20% abundance of PD-L1high CTCs had even higher DC rate of 64% (9/14), with only 14% DC rate for the rest (3/21). We also observed that the count changes of total CTC, PD-L1postive CTC and PD-L1high CTC correlate quite well with disease outcome (P<0.001, P = 0.002 and 0.007, respectively). In addition, the abundance of PD-L1high CTCs at baseline had predicative significance for progression free survival (PFS). Conclusions: We revealed that the abundance of PD-L1high CTCs at baseline might serve as a predictor to screen patients for PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapies and measuring the dynamic changes of CTC could indicate the therapeutic response at early time.
| S-EPMC5993493 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDurvalumab is an anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for consolidation therapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after chemoradiation. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the association between the degree of tumor PD-L1 expression and outcomes of stage III NSCLC patients treated with durvalumab.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of all the patients who received durvalumab between July 2017 and July 2019 at our facilities and were diagnosed with or progressed to stage III NSCLC before durvalumab consolidation. Patients were divided into groups based on the degree of PD-L1 expression: <1%, 1-49%, and 50-100%. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the effect of PD-L1 expression level on OS and PFS, adjusting for age and gender.ResultsWe identified 121 patients with stage III NSCLC that underwent durvalumab consolidation. Of them, 29.8% had PD-L1 expression of 50-100%, 24.8% had PD-L1 expression of 1-49%, and 27.3% had PD-L1 expression of <1%, while 18.2% were not tested for PD-L1 expression. The rate of cancer progression in the group with 50-100% PD-L1 expression was 16.7% compared to 60% in the 1-49% expression group and 54.6% in the <1% expression group, and the 1-year survival rates were higher in the 50-100% group (97%) compared to the 1-49% group and the <1% group (73% and 78%, respectively; P=0.028). Survival analysis via Kaplan-Meier revealed a significant difference in both PFS (P<0.0001) and OS (P<0.028) based on the extent of PD-L1 expression. Multivariate analysis revealed that a PD-L1 expression >50% was the only factor that was significantly associated with improved PFS (HR =0.205, P=0.0004) and OS (HR =0.339, P=0.04).ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that patients whose tumors had >50% PD-L1 expression had significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival than those with lower PD-L1 expression. This suggests that the degree of tumor PD-L1 expression may play a role in predicting benefit from durvalumab for these patients.
| S-EPMC8350087 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) hold great potential to answer key questions of how non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evolves and develops resistance upon anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. Currently, their clinical utility in NSCLC is compromised by a low detection rate with the established, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, EpCAM-based CellSearch® System. We tested an epitope-independent method (ParsortixTM system) and utilized it to assess PD-L1 expression of CTCs from NSCLC patients. We prospectively collected 127 samples, 97 of which were analyzed with the epitope-independent system in comparison to the CellSearch system. CTCs were determined by immunocytochemistry as intact, nucleated, CD45-, pankeratins (K)+ cells. PD-L1 status of CTCs was evaluated from 89 samples. With the epitope-independent system, ?1 CTC per blood sample was detected in 59 samples (61%) compared to 31 samples (32%) with the EpCAM-based system. Upon PD-L1 staining, 47% of patients harbored only PD-L1+CTCs, 47% had PD-L1+ and PD-L1-CTCs, and only 7% displayed exclusively PD-L1-CTCs. The percentage of PD-L1+CTCs did not correlate with the percentage of PD-L1+ in biopsies determined by immunohistochemistry (p = 0.179). Upon disease progression, all patients showed an increase in PD-L1+CTCs, while no change or a decrease in PD-L1+CTCs was observed in responding patients (n = 11; p = 0.001). Our data show a considerable heterogeneity in the PD-L1 status of CTCs from NSCLC patients. An increase of PD-L1+CTCs holds potential to predict resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.
| S-EPMC6627043 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Clinically, programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockades have demonstrated promising therapeutic outcomes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present study aimed to examine the impact of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) polymorphism on clinical outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with PD-1 blockades therapy. The present study was designed as a retrospective analysis, where a consecutive screening of 89 patients with advanced NSCLC who received PD-1 blockades monotherapy were screened. Biological specimens were collected to determine the presence of polymorphism and PD-L1 mRNA expression through genotyping. The analysis focused on examining the relationship between the genotype status of PD-L1 polymorphism and clinical outcomes. Among the 89 patients with advanced NSCLC, the use of PD-1 blockades monotherapy resulted in objective response rate (ORR) of 22.5%, a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 3.4 months [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.80-5.00) and a median overall survival (OS) of 11.3 months (95% CI: 7.93-14.67). The analysis of polymorphism indicated that only rs2297136 had clinical significance. Among the 89 patients with NSCLC, the prevalence of rs2297136 was as follows: A total of 58 cases (65.2%) had the AA genotype, 28 cases (31.5%) had the AG genotype and 3 cases (3.4%) had the GG genotype. This resulted in a minor allele frequency of 0.19, which was in consistent with Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (P=0.865). The correlation analysis between genotype status of rs2297136 and clinical outcomes indicated that patients with the AA genotype had an ORR of 19.0%, while those with the AG/GG genotype had an ORR of 29.0% (P=0.278). Additionally, the median PFS for the AA genotype was 2.95 months, compared with 5.30 months for the AG/GG genotype (P=0.038). Accordingly, median OS of the AA and AG/GG genotypes was 8.8 and 18.4 months, respectively (P=0.011). The mRNA expression of PD-L1 was significantly higher in patients with AG/GG genotype compared with those with AA genotype (P<0.001). In clinical practice, PD-1 blockades demonstrated promising effectiveness in treating patients with advanced NSCLC. The presence of the rs2297136 variant in PD-L1 gene could potentially be used as a biomarker to predict the clinical outcomes of PD-1 blockades.
| S-EPMC10879955 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PURPOSE:Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only a subset of patients benefit from ICIs, and the role of PD-L1 as predictive biomarker is still debated. A plasma immune-related miRNA-signature classifier (MSC) was established in lung cancer screening settings to identify the lethal form of the disease in early stages. In this exploratory study, we tested the efficacy of the MSC as prognostic marker in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:The MSC risk level was prospectively assessed in a consecutive series of 140 patients with NSCLC before starting treatment with ICIs. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in strata of PD-L1 and MSC alone or combined were considered as endpoints. Multiple plasma samples to monitor MSC risk level during treatment were also profiled. RESULTS:Adequate tissue and plasma samples were available from 111 (79%) and 104 (75%) patients with NSCLC, respectively. MSC risk level was associated with ORR (P = 0.0009), PFS [multivariate HR = 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-0.56; P = 0.0001], and OS (multivariate HR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18-0.59; P = 0.0002). The combination of MSC and PD-L1 stratified patients into three risk groups having 39%-18%-0% 1-year PFS (P < 0.0001) and 88%-44%-0% 1-year OS (P < 0.0001), according to the presence of 2-1-0 favorable markers. During treatment, MSC risk level decreased or remained low until tumor progression in patients with responsive or stable disease. CONCLUSIONS:The plasma MSC test could supplement PD-L1 tumor expression to identify a subgroup of patients with advanced lung cancer with worse ORR, PFS, and OS in immunotherapy regimens.
| S-EPMC6445748 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe activity of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced bladder cancer (BC) is promising for many patients. However, a subset of patients do not benefit from treatment, thus leading to an effort to better identify predictive molecular biomarkers of response.ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review of the literature on predictive molecular biomarkers associated with response to PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced bladder cancer, defined as locally-advanced, unresectable, or metastatic (mBC) disease.MethodsA search of the literature was performed using Embase (1947 - January 2019), Medline (1946 - January 2019), and EBM Reviews for Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (as of December 2018). Studies examining the association of molecular biomarkers with clinical outcome in BC treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 monotherapy were included. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, and objective response rate (ORR).ResultsUsing the study search criteria, 899 unique abstract citations were found, of which 834 did not meet the eligibility criteria. Full text of the remaining 65 citations were screened, and 50 studies excluded, including 18 review articles. Eight additional studies from the bibliography of the review papers were included, making a total of 23 studies. Five PD-1 / PD-L1 antibodies have been tested in BC immunohistochemistry (IHC). These studies used different expression scoring criteria and generally had poor ability to discriminate likelihood for response. Overall, the data suggests CD8+ T cell infiltration is necessary to mediate an antitumor immune response, but other immune cell populations, such as neutrophils may suppress T cell-mediated immunity and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. An IFNγ signature is a promising predictor, but there needs to be consensus on the optimal gene panel composition, and prospective validation. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is a promising predictor in six studies reporting on 1200 patients, but there is not a consensus on the optimal definition of "high TMB". Detection of T cell receptor (TCR) clonal expansion has only been conducted in small studies and so its predictive value remains inconclusive. Epithelial-mesenchymal transformation (EMT) and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) are associated with poor prognosis and possibly intrinsic resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade, but more work needs to be done to build upon and confirm the initial findings.ConclusionsCurrently no molecular biomarker is sufficiently mature for routine clinical use, while some candidates, or a combination show great promise and need further study.
| S-EPMC7747768 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeUrinary tract cancer can be pure urothelial carcinoma, pure nonurothelial carcinoma or variant urothelial carcinoma (defined here as mixed urothelial carcinoma). Little is known regarding outcomes for patients with variant urothelial carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. We hypothesized that variant urothelial carcinoma does not compromise immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study across 18 institutions. Demographic, clinicopathological, treatment and outcomes data were collected for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received immune checkpoint inhibitors. Patients were divided into pure vs variant urothelial carcinoma subgroups, with variant urothelial carcinoma further divided by type of variant (ie squamous, neuroendocrine etc). We compared overall response rate using univariate and multivariate logistic regression and progression-free survival and overall survival using Kaplan-Meier and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards.ResultsOverall 519 patients were identified, with 395, 406 and 403 included in overall response rate, overall survival and progression-free survival analyses, respectively. Overall response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors between patients with pure vs variant urothelial carcinoma was comparable (28% vs 29%, p=0.90) without significant differences for individual subtypes vs pure urothelial carcinoma. Median overall survival for patients with pure urothelial carcinoma was 11.0 months vs 10.1 months for variant urothelial carcinoma (p=0.60), but only 4.6 months for patients with neuroendocrine features (9 patients, HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.40-5.40 vs pure urothelial carcinoma, p=0.003). Median progression-free survival was 4.1 months for pure vs 5.2 months for variant urothelial carcinoma (p=0.43) and 3.7 months for neuroendocrine features (HR 1.87, 95% CI 0.92-3.79 vs pure urothelial carcinoma, p=0.09).ConclusionsOverall response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors was comparable across histological types. However, overall survival was worse for patients with tumors containing neuroendocrine features. Variant urothelial carcinoma should not exclude patients from receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.
| S-EPMC7289665 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The use of monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 axis completely changed anticancer treatment strategies. However, despite the significant improvement in overall survival and progression-free survival of patients undergoing these immunotherapy treatments, the only clinically accepted biomarker with some prediction capabilities for the outcome of the treatment is PD-L1 expression in tumor biopsies. Nevertheless, even when having PD-L1-positive tumors, numerous patients do not respond to these treatments. Considering the high cost of these therapies and the risk of immune-related adverse events during therapy, it is necessary to identify additional biomarkers that would facilitate stratifying patients in potential responders and non-responders before the start of immunotherapies. Here, we review the utility of PD-L1 expression not only in tumor cells but in immune system cells and their influence on the antitumor activity of immune cell subsets.
| S-EPMC7460585 | biostudies-literature