Dataset Information

The Influence of Geographic Region on Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Literature From 1988 to 2018.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Total joint arthroplasty constitutes a major focus of publications within orthopaedics. Because research expands and investigators from around the world contribute, it is important to understand the dynamics of publication.

Methods

PubMed was queried for hip and knee arthroplasty-related articles published between 1988 and 2018 within seven orthopaedic journals. A bibliometric analysis was done. The manuscript region of origin was determined by the affiliated country of the last author and used to examine trends in publication.

Results

A total of 6,160 publications were included. Forty-eight countries from six continents were identified. The quantity of arthroplasty-related publications increased over the study period (n = 246 in 1988 and n = 1,247 in 2018, P < 0.01). Articles were primarily published by North America (51.9%), Europe (32.5%), and Asia (12.4%). Clinical trials accounted for 45.6% of all publications. Articles from Asia received fewer citations than those from North America, Europe, and Oceania (P < 0.001).

Discussion

The volume of publications was five times greater in 2018 than in 1988, yet international articles constitute a marginal proportion of annual publications. Most of the literature (84.4%) originated from North America and Europe. Balanced publication of international research may favor global communication of findings, increasing the spectrum of available evidence applicable worldwide.

SUBMITTER: Sinclair ST

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8196095 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThis systematic review aims to summarise all the available evidence related to the association between pre-operative patient expectations (outcome expectations, process expectations and self efficacy expectations) and 5 different treatment outcomes (overall improvement, pain, function, stiffness and satisfaction) in patients with total knee or total hip arthroplasty at three different follow-op periods (>6 weeks; >6 weeks- ?6 months; >6 months).MethodsEnglish and Dutch language articles were identified through PubMed, EMBASE.com, PsycINFO, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library from inception to September 2012. Articles assessing the association between pre-operative patient expectations and treatment outcomes for TKA/THA in either adjusted or unadjusted analysis were included. Two reviewers, working independently, determined eligibility, rated methodological quality and extracted data on study design, population, expectation measurements, outcome measurements and strength of the associations. Methodological quality was rated by the same reviewers on a 19 item scale. The scores on the quality assessment were taken into account when drawing final conclusions.ResultsThe search strategy generated 2252 unique references, 18 articles met inclusion criteria. Scores on the methodological quality assessment ranged between 6% and 79%. Great variety was seen in definitions and measurement methods of expectations. No significant associations were found between patient expectations and overall improvement, satisfaction and stiffness. Both significant positive and non-significant associations were found for the association between expectations and pain and function.ConclusionsThere was no consistency in the association between patients' pre-operative expectations and treatment outcomes for TKA and THA indentified in this systematic review. There exists a need for a sound theoretical framework underlying the construct of 'patient expectations' and consistent use of valid measurement instruments to measure that construct in order to facilitate future research synthesis.