Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

19 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Is Combined Anteversion Equally Affected by Acetabular Cup and Femoral Stem Anteversion?

ABSTRACT:

Background

To create a safe zone, an understanding of the combined femoral and acetabular mating during hip motion is required. We investigated the position of the femoral head inside the acetabular liner during simulated hip motion. We hypothesized that cup and stem anteversions do not equally affect hip motion and combined hip anteversion.

Methods

Hip implant motion was simulated in standing, sitting, sit-to-stand, bending forward, squatting, and pivoting positions using the MATLAB software. A line passing through the center of the stem neck and the center of the prosthetic head exits at the polar axis (PA) of the prosthetic head. When the prosthetic head and liner are parallel, the PA faces the center of the liner (PA position = 0, 0). By simulating hip motion in 1-degree increments, the maximum distance of the PA from the liner center and the direction of its movement were measured (polar coordination system).

Results

The effect of modifying cup and stem anteversion on the direction and distance of the PA's change inside the acetabular liner was different. Stem anteversion influenced the PA position inside the liner more than cup anteversion during sitting, sit-to-stand, squatting, and bending forward (P = .0001). This effect was evident even when comparing stems with different neck angles (P = .0001).

Conclusion

Cup anteversion, stem anteversion, and stem neck-shaft angle affected the PA position inside the liner and combined anteversion in different ways. Thus, focusing on cup orientation alone when assessing hip motion during different daily activities is inadequate.

SUBMITTER: Pour AE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8197737 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

GeoGebra: A reliable and free software for measuring acetabular cup anteversion on digitalized plain radiographs.

Project description:ObjectiveAlthough accurate measurement of cup anteversion in hip replacement requires CT scans, however, its routine application, especially during follow-up, remains economically and ethically unreasonable. Thus, several methods have been devised for making this measurement on plain radiographs. In recent years, several ways have been adopted using software on digital radiographs. We present one such method which uses open access mathematical software GeoGebra.MethodsAnteversion was measured on 72 radiographs (36 cemented; 36 uncemented) by three different observers using this software. One observer repeated measurements at three weeks interval.ResultsThe intraclass correlation coefficient for interobserver variability and intraobserver variability was 0.982 (0.973-0.989) and 0.986 (0.978-0.991) respectively. There was a significant difference in the reliability of the method for cemented and uncemented cups with higher reliability for cemented cups (p < 0.001).ConclusionGeoGebra software can be used as a reliable alternative for measuring acetabular cup anteversion on good quality well centred digital radiographs of the pelvis.

| S-EPMC7068040 | biostudies-literature

Successful reconstruction of natural femoral anteversion using a short femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty surgery.

Project description:ObjectiveTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) involves postoperative risks, such as thigh pain, periprosthetic fractures, and stress yielding. Short, anatomical, metaphyseal-fitting, cementless femoral stems were developed to reduce these postoperative risks. This study aimed to examine the "MiniMAX" prosthesis, which is a new generation, short, anatomical femoral stem made by Medacta.MethodsPatients underwent a low-dose computed tomography scan. Femoral anteversion was measured. We assessed the position and anteversion of the femoral component and compared them with the unoperated side. We also assessed the patients' satisfaction and functional levels at 6 months postsurgery using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS).ResultsNineteen individuals were recruited in this study. We found no significant difference in femoral anteversion between the operated hip and the native hip. Using the HHS and OHS questionnaires, we found clinical improvement in the 6-month postoperative scores compared with the preoperative scores.DiscussionThe new-generation, short, anatomical femoral stem made by Medacta is successful in reproducing natural femoral anteversion, while also improving patients' functioning and lifestyle. Future large-scale, prospective comparison trials are required to further investigate this topic.

| S-EPMC9047853 | biostudies-literature

How to Estimate Femoral Stem Anteversion During Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC10907387 | biostudies-literature

Femoral Derotation Osteotomy Technique for Excessive Femoral Anteversion.

Project description:Excessive femoral anteversion may lead to increasing stress placed on the anterior acetabulum and soft tissues, which can predispose to intra-articular hip pathology. By addressing the excessive femoral anteversion in combination with intra-articular hip pathology, the results will be durable over time. This technique details how to perform a femoral derotation osteotomy for excessive femoral anteversion after addressing intra-articular pathology with hip arthroscopy in one surgical intervention. This allows the surgeon to address both the underlying pathoanatomy and the resultant intra-articular sequelae.

| S-EPMC5622587 | biostudies-other

Can the intra-operative measurement of the diameter of the femoral head help surgeons to choose the best size of the acetabular cup?

Project description:PurposeWe hypothesized that the intra-operative measurement of the femoral head may increase the accuracy of the acetabular cup size optimal selection in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this clinical research was to analyze the correlation between the estimated cup size from intra-operative measurement of the femoral head and the pre-operative templated cup size.MethodsA prospective observational single-center study was conducted from June 2019 to January 2020 including primary THA (n = 100). All cases were pre-operatively templated. The measurement of the anterior-posterior diameter of the femoral head was routinely intra-operatively performed. Any definitive implanted cup was considered as "oversized" when the size was > 4 mm than the diameter of the native head.ResultsThe median (interquartile range) size of the implanted cup, pre-operative planned cup size, and diameter of the femoral head were measured 52 (50-54) mm, 50 (48-54) mm and 49 (45-51) mm, respectively. Pre-operative planned size cup accurately predicted the implanted cup or differed in only one size (2 mm) in 77 (78%) cases. Otherwise, intra-operative femoral head measurement method accurately predicted the implanted or differed in only one size (2 mm) in 51 (87%) cases (p = 0.097).ConclusionThe intra-operative femoral head measurement is a simple and reliable tool to help the surgeons choose the best size of the acetabular cup and is as reliable as the pre-operative templating in order to avoid cup oversizing in THA. Utmost caution is warranted whenever the cup reamer is > 4 mm than the anterior-posterior diameter of the native head.

| S-EPMC9674749 | biostudies-literature

Higher Acetabular Anteversion in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Project description:BackgroundSurgical approach is known as a risk factor that influences cup malposition while performing total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, no study has been conducted comparing cup positioning between the supine direct anterior (DA) and supine direct lateral (DL) THA approaches.Questions/purposes(1) Is there a difference in acetabular cup positioning between supine DA and supine DL THA approaches? (2) Are there differences in complications based on acetabular cup positioning between the two approaches?MethodsFrom 2012 to 2014, 186 patients who underwent primary THAs using DA approach were matched with 186 patients using DL approach by body mass index, age, and gender. Cup anteversion and abduction angles were measured from standing anteroposterior pelvis radiographs by two blinded observers. The Lewinnek safe zone was used as the standard for cup positioning. Cup anteversion, abduction angles, and complications were recorded and compared.ResultsCup anteversion was on average 3° higher in the DA approach compared to the DL approach. The abduction angle for the DA approach was equivalent to the DL approach both averaging 46° to 47°. There were more DA hips outside of the safe zone (10%) for anteversion than DL (3%) hips. There were no differences in complications between DA and DL approaches.ConclusionThere is a tendency to antevert the acetabular cup when performing THAs using the DA approach, and one must be mindful of this when implanting the acetabular component.

| S-EPMC5026652 | biostudies-literature

Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty.

Project description:Combined cup and stem anteversion in THA based on femoral anteversion has been suggested as a method to compensate for abnormal femoral anteversion. We investigated the combined anteversion technique using computer navigation. In 47 THAs, the surgeon first estimated the femoral broach anteversion and validated the position by computer navigation. The broach was then measured with navigation. The navigation screen was blocked while the surgeon estimated the anteversion of the broach. This provided two estimates of stem anteversion. The navigated stem anteversion was validated by postoperative CT scans. All cups were implanted using navigation alone. We determined precision (the reproducibility) and bias (how close the average test number is to the true value) of the stem position. Comparing the surgeon estimate to navigation anteversion, the precision of the surgeon was 16.8 degrees and bias was 0.2 degrees ; comparing the navigation of the stem to postoperative CT anteversion, the precision was 4.8 degrees and bias was 0.2 degrees , meaning navigation is accurate. Combined anteversion by postoperative CT scan was 37.6 degrees +/- 7 degrees (standard deviation) (range, 19 degrees -50 degrees ). The combined anteversion with computer navigation was within the safe zone of 25 degrees to 50 degrees for 45 of 47 (96%) hips. Femoral stem anteversion had a wide variability.Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

| S-EPMC2600986 | biostudies-other

Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset.

Project description:UNLABELLED: Restoration of femoral offset and acetabular inclination may have an effect on polyethylene (PE) wear in THA. We therefore assessed the effect of femoral offset and acetabular inclination (angle) on acetabular conventional (not highly cross-linked) PE wear in uncemented THA. We prospectively followed 43 uncemented THAs for a minimum of 49 months (mean, 64 months; range, 49-88 months). Radiographs were assessed for femoral offset, acetabular inclination, and conventional PE wear. The mean (+/- standard deviation) linear wear rate in all THAs was 0.14 mm/year (+/- 0.01 mm/year) and the mean volumetric wear rate was 53.1 mm(3)/year (+/- 5.5 mm(3)/year). In THAs with an acetabular angle less than 45 degrees , the mean wear was 0.12 mm/year (+/- 0.01 mm/year) compared with 0.18 mm/year (+/- 0.02 mm/year) in those with a reconstructed acetabular angle greater than 45 degrees . Reproduction of a reconstructed femoral offset to within 5 mm of the native femoral offset was associated with a reduction in conventional PE wear (0.12 mm/year versus 0.16 mm/year). Careful placement of the acetabular component to ensure an acetabular angle less than 45 degrees in the reconstructed hip allows for reduced conventional PE wear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

| S-EPMC2758973 | biostudies-other

Intraoperative Pelvic Tilt and Axial Rotation During Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach is Affected by the Acetabular Retractor and Cup Impactor.

Project description:BackgroundIntraoperative pelvic motion during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the supine position affects acetabular cup placement and occurs at each step of THA; however, there are no reports of pelvic motion changes during each stage of THA via the direct anterior approach (DAA). This study aimed to evaluate pelvic motion at each step of THA through the DAA.MethodsFrom March to October 2022, 71 hips were prospectively measured for intraoperative pelvic tilt and axial rotation during THA through the DAA at a single center. These parameters were measured during each surgical step using the augmented reality-hip navigation system.ResultsBoth pelvic tilt and axial rotation were maximal during acetabular cup placement. The mean intraoperative pelvic tilt and axial rotation during cup placement were 4.8 ± 2.6° (95% confidence interval, 4.19-5.41°) and 4.2 ± 3.3° (95% confidence interval, 3.42-4.98°), respectively. The effects of the acetabular retractor and cup impactor on pelvic tilt and axial rotation were comparable. Spearman's correlation tests showed significant correlation between axial rotation and body mass index (r = -0.444, P = .00011).ConclusionsThe pelvis tilts forward and rotates toward the surgical side during THA through the DAA. The effects of the acetabular retractor and cup impactor on pelvic motion are comparable. Cup implantation must take into account pelvic movement, and it must be recognized that the pelvis is moving at that time, even with only the acetabular retractor inserted, compared to before the skin incision.

| S-EPMC10665692 | biostudies-literature

Spinopelvic Mobility Pattern and Acetabular Anteversion in Stiff Hips With Ankylosing Spondylitis After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Project description:BackgroundFused hips with spine stiffness in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) reduce spinopelvic mobility. We aimed to assess spinopelvic mobility pattern and acetabular anteversion in AS after total hip arthroplasty (THA).Material and methodsNinety-four stiff hips in 58 AS individuals (mean age: 37.05) who underwent THA between 2012 and 2018 with a modified lateral approach were included. Twenty-three hips were fused, and 71 hips had mean flexion of 37.67°. Pelvic tilt, pelvic inclination, sacral slope (SS), and lumbar lordosis were correlated with THA, and functional outcomes were assessed at 34.6-month mean follow-up.ResultsThirty-seven had a stuck sitting pattern with stuck standing seen in 4 individuals. SS standing before and after THA were 25.08° and 27.30°. SS sitting was 8.99° compared to 16.80°. SS from sitting to standing was reduced (17.7°) in 17 individuals. Spine stiffness in extension was seen in 4 out of 37. Mean acetabular inclination after THA was 42.67°, and acetabular anteversion was 17.48°. Flexion after THA improved to mean 98.47°. Changes in SS from sitting to standing were correlated with THA (r-value: 0.93, P-value: .0001). The Harris Hip Score improved from 25.31 to 82.39 (P-value <.05), and the mean 12-item Short Form Survey at review was 52.18 and 59.55 (physical and mental components). The mean Western Ontario and Mc Master Universities Arthritis Index score was 17.56.ConclusionsSpinopelvic mobility change was <10° after THA in AS, stuck sitting was seen in 37 of 58 (63.8%), and stuck standing was seen in 4 of 58 (6.9%), including spine stiffness in flexion or extension. Acetabular anteversion assessed was 17.48° (standard deviation: 4.41), with significant functional improvement.Level of evidenceLevel 4.

| S-EPMC9237950 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data