Dataset Information

Impact of frontline treatment approach on outcomes of myeloid blast phase CML.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The natural course of untreated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is progression to an aggressive blast phase. Even in the current era of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the outcomes of blast phase CML remain poor with no consensus frontline treatment approach.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the response rates and survival outcomes of 104 consecutive patients with myeloid blast phase CML (CML-MBP) treated from 2000 to 2019 based on 4 different frontline treatment approaches: intensive chemotherapy (IC) + TKI (n = 20), hypomethylating agent (HMA) + TKI (n = 20), TKI alone (n = 56), or IC alone (n = 8). We also evaluated the impact of TKI selection and subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) on patient outcomes.

Results

Response rates were similar between patients treated with IC + TKI and HMA + TKI. Compared to treatment with TKI alone, treatment with IC/HMA + TKI resulted in a higher rate of complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) (57.5% vs 33.9%, p < 0.05), a higher complete cytogenetic response rate (45% vs 10.7%, p < 0.001), and more patients proceeding to ASCT (32.5% vs 10.7%, p < 0.01). With a median follow-up of 6.7 years, long-term outcomes were similar between the IC + TKI and HMA + TKI groups. Combination therapy with IC/HMA + TKI was superior to therapy with TKI alone, including when analysis was limited to those treated with a 2nd/3rd-generation TKI. When using a 2nd/3rd-generation TKI, IC/HMA + TKI led to lower 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR; 44% vs 86%, p < 0.05) and superior 5-year event-free survival (EFS; 28% vs 0%, p < 0.05) and overall survival (OS; 34% vs 8%, p = 0.23) compared to TKI alone. Among patients who received IC/HMA + TKI, EFS and OS was superior for patients who received a 2nd/3rd generation TKI compared to those who received imatinib-based therapy. In a landmark analysis, 5-year OS was higher for patients who proceeded to ASCT (58% vs 22%, p = 0.12).

Conclusions

Compared to patients treated with TKI alone for CML-MBP, treatment with IC + TKI or HMA + TKI led to improved response rates, CIR, EFS, and OS, particularly for patients who received a 2nd/3rd-generation TKI. Combination therapy with IC + TKI or HMA + TKI, rather than a TKI alone, should be considered the optimal treatment strategy for patients with CML-MBP.

SUBMITTER: Saxena K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8204504 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a model of leukemogenesis in which the exact molecular mechanisms underlying blast crisis still remained unexplored. The current study identified multiple common and rare important findings in myeloid blast crisis CML (MBC-CML) using integrated genomic sequencing, covering all classes of genes implicated in the leukemogenesis model. Integrated genomic sequencing via Whole Exome Sequencing (WES), Chromosome-seq and RNA-sequencing were conducted on the peripheral blood samples of three CML patients in the myeloid blast crisis. An in-house filtering pipeline was applied to assess important variants in cancer-related genes. Standard variant interpretation guidelines were used for the interpretation of potentially important findings (PIFs) and potentially actionable findings (PAFs). Single nucleotide variation (SNV) and small InDel analysis by WES detected sixteen PIFs affecting all five known classes of leukemogenic genes in myeloid malignancies including signaling pathway components (ABL1, PIK3CB, PTPN11), transcription factors (GATA2, PHF6, IKZF1, WT1), epigenetic regulators (ASXL1), tumor suppressor and DNA repair genes (BRCA2, ATM, CHEK2) and components of spliceosome (PRPF8). These variants affect genes involved in leukemia stem cell proliferation, self-renewal, and differentiation. Both patients No.1 and No.2 had actionable known missense variants on ABL1 (p.Y272H, p.F359V) and frameshift variants on ASXL1 (p.A627Gfs*8, p.G646Wfs*12). The GATA2-L359S in patient No.1, PTPN11-G503V and IKZF1-R208Q variants in the patient No.3 were also PAFs. RNA-sequencing was used to confirm all of the identified variants. In the patient No. 3, chromosome sequencing revealed multiple pathogenic deletions in the short and long arms of chromosome 7, affecting at least three critical leukemogenic genes (IKZF1, EZH2, and CUX1). The large deletion discovered on the short arm of chromosome 17 in patient No. 2 resulted in the deletion of TP53 gene as well. Integrated genomic sequencing combined with RNA-sequencing can successfully discover and confirm a wide range of variants, from SNVs to CNVs. This strategy may be an effective method for identifying actionable findings and understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying MBC-CML, as well as providing further insights into the genetic basis of MBC-CML and its management in the future.