Dataset Information

Early Intubation and Increased Coronavirus Disease 2019 Mortality: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

There has been controversy about the timing and indications for intubation and mechanical ventilation in novel coronavirus disease 2019. This study assessed the effect of early intubation and mechanical ventilation on all-cause, inhospital mortality for coronavirus disease 2019 patients.

Design

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Eleven municipal hospitals in New York City from March 1, 2020, to December 1, 2020.

Patients

Adult patients who tested positive for coronavirus disease 2019 in the emergency department were subsequently admitted. Patients with do-not-intubate orders at admission were excluded.

Interventions

Intubation within 48 hours of triage and intubation at any point during hospital stay.

Measurements and main results

Data from 7,597 coronavirus disease 2019 patients were included; of these, 1,628 (21%) were intubated overall and 807 (11%) were intubated within 48 hours of triage. After controlling for available confounders, intubation rates for coronavirus disease 2019 patients varied significantly across hospitals and decreased steadily as the pandemic progressed. After nearest neighbor propensity score matching, intubation within 48 hours of triage was associated with higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.30 [1.15-1.48]; p < 0.0001), as was intubation at any time point (hazard ratio, 1.62 [1.45-1.80]; p < 0.0001). Among intubated patients, intubation within 48 hours of triage was not significantly associated with differences in mortality (hazard ratio, 1.09 [0.94-1.26]; p = 0.26). These results remained robust to multiple sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

Intubation within 48 hours of triage, as well as at any time point in the hospital course, was associated with increased mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 patients in this observational study.

SUBMITTER: Parish AJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8208412 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:To determine the impact of tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin 6 receptor, on survival in patients with coronavirus disease 2019.DesignObservational cohort study of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 between March 1, 2020, and April 24, 2020. A propensity-matched (1:1) analysis was used to compare patients who received tocilizumab to controls who did not. Competing risk survival analysis was used to determine the primary outcome of time to mortality, and adjusted log-linear and logistic regression for secondary outcomes.SettingThree hospitals within the NYU Langone Health system in New York.PatientsConsecutive adult patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019.InterventionTocilizumab 400-mg IV once in addition to standard of care or standard of care alone.Measurements and main resultsData from 3,580 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 positive qualifying hospitalized patients were included, of whom 497 (13.9%) were treated with tocilizumab. In the analysis of tocilizumab-treated patients and matched controls, fewer tocilizumab-treated patients died (145/497, 29.2%) than did controls (211/497, 42.4%). In the adjusted competing risk regression model, tocilizumab therapy was associated with improved survival relative to controls (hazard ratio = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.18-0.33, p < 0.001). Tocilizumab-treated patients and controls had similar adjusted time to discharge from hospital (hazard ratio = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.78-1.17, p = 0.67). However, they had longer adjusted ICU length of stay (rate ratio = 3.1, 95% CI = 2.5-3.7, p < 0.001) and a higher adjusted infection rate (odds ratio = 4.18, 95% CI = 2.72-6.52, p < 0.001) than controls.ConclusionsTocilizumab therapy was associated with significantly improved survival in coronavirus disease 2019 patients. This survival benefit was associated with increased ICU length of stay and increased infection rate, even as more patients in the tocilizumab group were rescued from rapid death. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial is needed to confirm these findings.

Project description:BackgroundCytokine release syndrome (CRS) plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology and progression of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) by removing the pathogenic cytokines is hypothesized to dampen CRS.ObjectiveTo evaluate the outcomes of the patients with COVID-19 having CRS being treated with TPE compared to controls on the standard of care.MethodologyRetrospective propensity score-matched analysis in a single centre from 1st April to 31st July 2020. We retrospectively analyzed data of 280 hospitalized patients developing CRS initially. PSM was used to minimize bias from non-randomized treatment assignment. Using PSM 1:1, 90 patients were selected and assigned to 2 equal groups. Forced matching was done for disease severity, routine standard care and advanced supportive care. Many other Co-variates were matched. Primary outcome was 28 days overall survival. Secondary outcomes were duration of hospitalization, CRS resolution time and timing of viral clearance on Polymerase chain reaction testing.ResultsAfter PS-matching, the selected cohort had a median age of 60 years (range 32-73 in TPE, 37-75 in controls), p = 0.325 and all were males. Median symptoms duration was 7 days (range 3-22 days' TPE and 3-20 days controls), p = 0.266. Disease severity in both groups was 6 (6.6%) moderate, 40 (44.4%) severe and 44 (49%) critical. Overall, 28-day survival was significantly superior in the TPE group (91.1%), 95% CI 78.33-97.76; as compared to PS-matched controls (61.5%), 95% CI 51.29-78.76 (log rank 0.002), p<0.001. Median duration of hospitalization was significantly reduced in the TPE treated group (10 days vs 15 days) (p< 0.01). CRS resolution time was also significantly reduced in the TPE group (6 days vs. 12 days) (p< 0.001). In 71 patients who underwent TPE, the mortality was 0 (n = 43) if TPE was done within the first 12 days of illness while it was 17.9% (deaths 5, n = 28 who received it after 12th day (p = 0.0045).ConclusionAn earlier use of TPE was associated with improved overall survival, early CRS resolution and time to discharge compared to SOC for COVID-19 triggered CRS in this selected cohort of PS-matched male patients from one major hospital in Pakistan.

Project description:BackgroundPrevious studies showed bacterial lysates were effective for pediatric asthma. However, evidence of polyvalent bacterial lysate Qipian is lacking.MethodsIn this real-world retrospective cohort study, data of children with asthma, aged six months to 14 years old, attending to Jiangxi Provincial Children's Hospital from January 2021 to April 2022, prescribed routine treatment for asthma plus Qipian (Qipian group) or not (control group) were extracted. To minimize the impact of confounders on the outcomes, baseline characteristics were utilized to perform propensity score matching through a multivariable logistic regression model. After matching, asthma control, exacerbation, etc. were compared.ResultsTotally, 795 patients were included (337 in the Qipian group and 458 in the control group), with 278 pairs (556 patients) matched. Most baseline characteristics were well-balanced. The proportion of males were 68.3% and 70.1% in the two groups. The Qipian group favored better asthma control, with more "controlled" [3-month: 257 (92.4%) vs. 240 (86.3%); 6-month: 246 (88.5%) vs. 235 (84.5%)], and fewer "poorly/very poorly controlled" patients, compared with the control group (P=0.004 and 0.025, respectively). Patients in the Qipian group had lower risks of exacerbation. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) for any exacerbation were 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33 to 0.93] in the 3-month period and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.55 to 1.26) in the 6-month period. IRR for severe exacerbations were 0.09 (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.71) in the 3-month period and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.70) in the 6-month period (compared to the control group). Qipian significantly reduced the cumulative dose of short-acting beta-agonist (3-month: 3.22±10.37 vs. 8.08±16.71 mg; P<0.001; 6-month: 6.56±16.23 vs. 11.81±24.41 mg; P=0.002). There was no difference in incidences of respiratory tract infection or fever due to respiratory tract infection between the two groups. Numbers of antibacterial agent prescription were fewer in the Qipian group compared to the control group (3-month: 0.67±1.16 vs. 1.04±1.45; P=0.001; 6-month: 1.14±1.69 vs. 1.51±2.12; P=0.023).ConclusionsAccording to this retrospective study, Qipian may be effective for improved pediatric asthma control. Safety profile and mechanisms of action of Qipian need further investigation. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm our results.