Dataset Information

Evaluation of self-report screening measures in the detection of depressive and anxiety disorders among children and adolescents with systemic lupus erythematosus.

ABSTRACT:

Background

There are no validated screening measures for depressive or anxiety disorders in childhood Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (cSLE). We investigated cross-sectionally (1) the prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorder in cSLE. (2) the validity of the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC) and the Screen for Childhood Anxiety and Related Disorders (SCARED) measures in identifyingthese disorders.

Methods

Participants 8-18 years with cSLE/incipient cSLE completed CES-DC, SCARED, and Quality OfMy Life (QOML) measures. Parents completed the SCARED-Parent measure. Diagnosis was by gold-standard psychiatric interview and determined prevalence of psychiatric disorder. Receiver Operating Characteristics Area under the Curve (ROCAUC) evaluated screening measure diagnostic performance.

Results

Ofseventy-two parent-child dyads, 56 interviews were completed. Mean screen scores were: CES-DC = 15 (range 1-49, SD 12), SCARED-C = 22 (range 2-61, SD 14), SCARED-P = 13 (range 0-36, SD 8). Depressive disorder screen positivity (CES-DC ≥ 15) was 35% (vs. prevalence 5%). Anxiety disorder screen positivity (SCARED ≥ 25) was 39% (vs. prevalence 16%). CES-DC ROCAUC = 0.98 and SCARED-C ROCAUC = 0.7 (cut-points 38 and 32 respectively).

Conclusions

Diagnostic thresholds for depressive and anxiety disorderscreening measures are high for both CES-DC and SCARED-C in cSLE. Brief focused interview should follow to determine whether psychiatric evaluation is warranted.

SUBMITTER: Quilter M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8209764 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem-involved, highly heterogeneous autoimmune disease with diverse clinical manifestations. We report an extremely rare case of SLE with severe diffuse myocardial hypertrophy.MethodsThe patient's echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) results indicated diffuse myocardial hypertrophy. After excluding coronary atherosclerosis, hypertensive cardiomyopathy, drug toxicity, and other causes, the patient was diagnosed with SLE-specific cardiomyopathy. Medications such as hormones, antimalarials, immunosuppressants, and biologics were administered.ResultsAncillary test results were as follows: hs-cTnI: 0.054 ng/mL (0-0.016); NTproBNP: 1594.0 pg/mL (<150); A contrast-enhanced CMR revealed the diffuse thickening of the left ventricular wall with multiple abnormal enhancements, reduced left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, and moderate amount of pericardial effusion. Endomyocardial myocardial biopsy was performed, showing cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and degeneration, and no changes in myocarditis or amyloidosis. The pathology viewed by electron microscopy showed increased intracellular glycogen in the myocardium, and no hydroxychloroquine-associated damage in the myocardium. The 24-h ambulatory blood pressure and contrast-enhanced computed tomography of coronary arteries were normal. The diagnosis of SLE-specific cardiomyopathy was clear. The myocardial hypertrophy showed reversible alleviation following treatment with high-dose corticosteroids. CMR results before and after treatment were as follows: interventricular septum, pretreatment (28) versus post-treatment (22) mm; left ventricular inferior wall, pretreatment (18-21) versus post-treatment (12-14) mm; left ventricular lateral wall, pretreatment (17-18) versus post-treatment (10-12) mm; pericardial effusion (left ventricular lateral wall), pretreatment (25) versus post-treatment (12) mm; left ventricular ejection fraction, pretreatment (38.9%) versus post-treatment (66%).ConclusionMyocardial hypertrophy may be an important sign of active and prognostic assessment in SLE diagnosis and management. Similarly, when encountering cases of myocardial hypertrophy, the possibility of autoimmune disease should be considered in addition to common causes.