Dataset Information

Ultrahigh-field cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 and T2 mapping for the assessment of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in rat models: validation against histopathologic changes.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity is a well-recognized adverse effect of chemotherapy. Quantitative T1-mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is useful for detecting subclinical myocardial changes in anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. The aim of the present study was to histopathologically validate the T1 and T2 mapping parameters for the evaluation of diffuse myocardial changes in rat models of cardiotoxicity.

Methods

Rat models of cardiotoxicity were generated by injecting rats with doxorubicin (1 mg/kg, twice a week). CMR was performed with a 9.4 T ultrahigh-field scanner using cine, pre-T1, post-T1 and T2 mapping sequences to evaluate the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), native T1, T2, and extracellular volume fraction (ECV). Histopathological examinations were performed and the association of histopathological changes with CMR parameters was assessed.

Results

Five control rats and 36 doxorubicin-treated rats were included and classified into treatment periods. In the doxorubicin-treated rats, the LVEF significantly decreased after 12 weeks of treatment (control vs. 12-week treated: 73 ± 4% vs. 59 ± 9%, P = 0.01). Increased native T1 and ECV were observed after 6 weeks of treatment (control vs. 6-week treated: 1148 ± 58 ms, 14.3 ± 1% vs. 1320 ± 56 ms, 20.3 ± 3%; P = 0.005, < 0.05, respectively). T2 values also increased by six weeks of treatment (control vs. 6-week treated: 16.3 ± 2 ms vs. 10.3 ± 1 ms, P < 0.05). The main histopathological features were myocardial injury, interstitial fibrosis, inflammation, and edema. The mean vacuolar change (%), fibrosis (%), and inflammation score were significantly higher in 6-week treated rats than in the controls (P = 0.03, 0.03, 0.02, respectively). In the univariable analysis, vacuolar change showed the highest correlation with native T1 value (R = 0.60, P < 0.001), and fibrosis showed the highest correlation with ECV value (R = 0.78, P < 0.001). In the multiple linear regression analysis model, vacuolar change was a significant factor for change in native T1 (P = 0.01), and vacuolar change and fibrosis were significant factors for change in ECV (P = 0.006, P < 0.001, respectively) by adding other histopathological parameters (i.e., inflammation and edema scores) CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative T1 and T2 mapping CMR is a useful non-invasive tool reflecting subclinical histopathological changes in anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity.

SUBMITTER: Park HS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8210390 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAlthough reference ranges of T1 and T2 mapping are well established for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) at 1.5T, data for 3T are still lacking. The objective of this study is to establish reference ranges of myocardial T1 and T2 based on a large multicenter cohort of healthy Chinese adults at 3T CMR.MethodsA total of 1015 healthy Chinese adults (515 men, age range: 19-87 years) from 11 medical centers who underwent CMR using 3T Siemens scanners were prospectively enrolled. T1 mapping was performed with a motion-corrected modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence using a 5(3)3 scheme. T2 mapping images were acquired using T2-prepared fast low-angle shot sequence. T1 and T2 relaxation times were quantified for each slice and each myocardial segment. The T1 mapping and extracellular volume standardization (T1MES) phantom was used for quality assurance at each center prior to subject scanning.ResultsThe phantom analysis showed strong consistency of spin echo, T1 mapping, and T2 mapping among centers. In the entire cohort, global T1 and T2 reference values were 1193 ± 34 ms and 36 ± 2.5 ms. Global T1 and T2 values were higher in females than in males (T1: 1211 ± 29 ms vs. 1176 ± 30 ms, p < 0.001; T2: 37 ± 2.3 ms vs. 35 ± 2.5 ms, p < 0.001). There were statistical differences in global T2 across age groups (p < 0.001), but not in global T1. Linear regression showed no correlation between age and global T1 or T2 values. In males, positive correlation was found between heart rate and global T1 (r = 0.479, p < 0.001).ConclusionsUsing phantom-validated imaging sequences, we provide reference ranges for myocardial T1 and T2 values on 3T scanners in healthy Chinese adults, which can be applied across participating sites. Trial registration URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx . Unique identifier: ChiCTR1900025518. Registration name: 3T magnetic resonance myocardial quantitative imaging standardization and reference value study: a multi-center clinical study.

Project description:AIMS:The purpose of this retrospective single-centre study was to evaluate the non-invasive detection of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB)-established chronic myocardial inflammation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) using T1 and T2 mapping. METHODS AND RESULTS:The study population consisted of 52 retrospectively identified HFrEF patients who underwent EMB and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla. EMB was defined according to the position statement of the European Society of Cardiology and served as reference to identify inflammation in all patients. A control group of healthy volunteers with prior cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies (n = 58) was also identified. Global and segmental T1 and T2 values as well as septal measurements and tissue heterogeneity parameters were calculated. Out of the 52 patients with HFrEF, 33 patients had myocardial inflammation detected by EMB, while 19 patients were EMB negative for inflammation. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 31% in both groups (P = 0.97). Global T1 and T2 values in HFrEF patients were significantly higher compared with healthy controls (T1 1275 ± 69 ms vs. 1,175 ± 44 ms, P < 0.001; T2 40.0 ± 3.4 ms vs. 37.9 ± 1.6 ms, P < 0.001). The distribution of T1 and T2 values between patients with and without EMB-proven chronic myocardial inflammation was not statistically different when regarding global (T1 1292 ± 71 ms vs. 1266 ± 67 ms, P = 0.26; T2 40.0 ± 2.6 ms vs. 40.0 ± 3.9 ms, P = 1.0), septal (T1 1299 ± 63 ms vs. 1289 ± 76 ms, P = 0.76; T2 40.1 ± 3.5 ms vs 40.0 ± 6.4 ms, P = 0.49) or maximum segmental values (T1 1414 ± 111 ms vs. 1363 ± 88 ms, P = 0.15; T2 47.3 ± 5.2 ms vs. 48.8 ± 11.8 ms, P = 0.53). Mean absolute deviation of segmental T1 and T2 values and log-transformed pixel-wise standard deviation as parameters of tissue heterogeneity did not reveal statistical significant differences between inflammation-positive and inflammation-negative HFrEF patients (all P > 0.4). CONCLUSIONS:Conventionally performed quantitative T1 and T2 mapping values significantly correlated with prevalence of HFrEF but did not discriminate HFrEF patients with or without chronic myocardial inflammation in our cohort. This suggests that EMB is the preferred method to detect chronic myocardial inflammation in HFrEF.