Dataset Information

Programmed death ligand-1 regulates angiogenesis and metastasis by participating in the c-JUN/VEGFR2 signaling axis in ovarian cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Although programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) plays a well-known function in immune checkpoint response by interacting with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), the cell-intrinsic role of PD-L1 in tumors is still unclear. Here, we explored the molecular regulatory mechanism of PD-L1 in the progression and metastasis of ovarian cancer.

Methods

Immunohistochemistry of benign tissues and ovarian cancer samples was performed, followed by migration, invasion, and angiogenesis assays in PD-L1-knockdown ovarian cancer cells. Immunoprecipitation, mass spectrometry, and chromatin immunoprecipitation were conducted along with zebrafish and mouse experiments to explore the specific functions and mechanisms of PD-L1 in ovarian cancer.

Results

Our results showed that PD-L1 induced angiogenesis, which further promoted cell migration and invasion in vitro and in vivo of ovarian cancer. Mechanistically, PD-L1 was identified to directly interact with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2) and then activated the FAK/AKT pathway, which further induced angiogenesis and tumor progression, leading to poor prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. Meanwhile, PD-L1 was found to be regulated by the oncogenic transcription factor c-JUN at the transcriptional level, which enhanced the expression of PD-L1 in ovarian cancer. Furthermore, we demonstrated that PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab, combined with the antiangiogenic drug, apatinib, could enhance the effect of anti-angiogenesis and the inhibition of cell migration and invasion.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrated that PD-L1 promoted the angiogenesis and metastasis of ovarian cancer by participating in the c-JUN/VEGFR2 signaling axis, suggesting that the combination of PD-L1 inhibitor and antiangiogenic drugs may be considered as a potential therapeutic approach for ovarian cancer patients.

SUBMITTER: Yang Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8211352 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionThe clinical successes seen with anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-[L]1) agents have galvanized the field of immuno-oncology. We evaluated the landscape and trends in immunotherapy trials involving the PD-(L)1 axis in intrathoracic tumors.MethodsWe identified clinical trials involving anti-PD-(L)1 agents on the ClinicalTrials.gov registry through November 13, 2020 for NSCLC, SCLC, mesothelioma, and thymic epithelial tumor. Clinical trials were indexed according to monotherapy versus combination approaches, PD-(L)1 agents under investigation, clinical settings, trial start date, and partner drug(s). We assessed redundancy among the clinical trials.ResultsWe found 686 clinical trials investigating anti-PD-(L)1 agents for intrathoracic tumors (540 trials in NSCLC, 96 in SCLC, 38 in mesothelioma, and 12 in thymic epithelial tumor). A total of 23 PD-(L)1 inhibitors are undergoing clinical development. A total of 81% of trials assess combination treatment. The number of clinical trials has been growing exponentially in the past decade. PD-(L)1 blockade was frequently combined with chemotherapy or immunomodulatory therapy. Various strategies are in development to overcome resistance to PD-(L)1 blockade in metastatic NSCLC. PD-(L)1 blockade is also increasingly evaluated in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. After the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's approval of an anti-PD-(L)1 agent for a specific indication, 14 trials were launched thereafter, which continued to randomize patients to treatments that were inferior to the best available therapy.ConclusionsThe number of clinical trials investigating anti-PD-(L)1 agents in intrathoracic tumors has experienced a steep increase over the past decade with a notable upward trend for combination trials. To reduce duplicative research efforts and accelerate the development of effective immunotherapeutics, improved coordination among key stakeholders and the adoption of innovative trial designs will be vital.