Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Disability assessment using Google Maps.


ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To evaluate the concordance between Google Maps® application (GM®) and clinical practice measurements of ambulatory function (e.g., Ambulation Score (AS) and respective Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS).

Materials and methods

This is a cross-sectional multicenter study. AS and EDSS were calculated using GM® and routine clinical methods; the correspondence between the two methods was assessed. A multinomial logistic model is investigated which demographic (age, sex) and clinical features (e.g., disease subtype, fatigue, depression) might have influenced discrepancies between the two methods.

Results

Two hundred forty-three pwMS were included; discrepancies in AS and in EDDS assessments between GM® and routine clinical methods were found in 81/243 (33.3%) and 74/243 (30.4%) pwMS, respectively. Progressive phenotype (odds ratio [OR] = 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-7.11, p = 0.03), worse fatigue (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p = 0.01), and more severe depression (OR = 1.1; 95% CI 1.04-1.17, p = 0.002) were associated with discrepancies between GM® and routine clinical scoring.

Conclusion

GM® could easily be used in a real-life clinical setting to calculate the AS and the related EDSS scores. GM® should be considered for validation in further clinical studies.

SUBMITTER: Lavorgna L 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8211455 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC2770834 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4750372 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5722383 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6033449 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8137195 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3548681 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3658873 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3988681 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6611389 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10016707 | biostudies-literature