Dataset Information

Rigor and reproducibility training for first year medical students in research pathways.

ABSTRACT: In the Spring of 2020, we launched a rigor and reproducibility curriculum for medical students in research training programs. This required class consisted of eight, 2-h sessions, which transitioned to remote learning in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic. The class was graded as pass/fail. Flipped classroom techniques, with multiple hands-on exercises, were developed for first-year medical students (MD/PhD [n = 9], Clinical and Translational Research Pathway (CTRP) students [n = 9]). Four focus groups (n = 13 students) and individual interviews with the two instructors were conducted in May 2020. From individual interviews with instructors and focus groups with medical students, the course and its components were favorably reviewed. Students thought the course was novel, important, relevant, and practical-and teaching strategies were effective (e.g., short lectures, interactive small group exercises, and projects). Most students expressed concerns about lack of time for course preparation. Sharper focus and streamlining of preparation work may be required. Pre- and post-student self-assessments of rigor and reproducibility competencies showed average post-scores ranging from high/moderate to strong understanding (n = 11). We conclude that rigor and reproducibility can be taught to first-year medical students in research pathways programs in a highly interactive and remote format. Study Highlights WHAT IS THE CURRENT KNOWLEDGE ON THE TOPIC? The rigor and reproducibility crisis calls for robust training of scientists in best practices for enhancing the research rigor. WHAT QUESTION DID THIS STUDY ADDRESS? We evaluated a curriculum to develop physician-scientists skilled at documenting research workflow from idea generation to publication with reproducibility in mind. WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD TO OUR KNOWLEDGE? Highly interactive exercises, coupled with a hands-on replication group project provide a pathway for students to gain competencies important to the improvement of rigor and reproducibility in scientific research. Rigor and reproducibility can be taught in a highly interactive format and using a remote format. HOW MIGHT THIS CHANGE CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY OR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE? Formal training is needed to raise awareness of the reproducibility crisis and improve the rigor of research conducted. If techniques taught are used, the transparency and reproducibility of clinical and translational science will be improved.

SUBMITTER: Lapane KL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8212706 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionRecently, stories depicting social injustices and inequities have gripped the US, leading to protests and other demonstrations of student activism. In response to current events, students at Weill Cornell Medical College identified the need for more diversity inclusion components in the newly developed medical school curriculum. Thus, we developed a student-initiated, student-run elective, Community Perspectives in Medicine, which provides a forum for first-year medical students to interact, and have open discussions, with members of communities most impacted by social and health inequities.MethodsDuring five weekly 2-hour sessions, representatives of different community-based organizations (CBOs) speak with 15 first-year medical students. Invited CBOs represent diverse populations, including LGBT, chronic illness, disabilities, religion, and immigrant health. For each session's first hour, a second-year student facilitates a semistructured interview of the CBO guests focusing on health disparities within their community, challenges experienced with the medical system, and what they wish doctors did differently. Students are encouraged to ask questions, often resulting in a rich dialogue. The session's second part is a debriefing by the student facilitator over a relaxed dinner (without CBO guests).ResultsFourteen of the16 enrolled students attended all five sessions and completed the course evaluation. Satisfaction with the course was high, as 93% of students enrolled rated the course as excellent. The course format, content, and diversity of speakers were rated as excellent by 79%, 86%, and 93%, respectively. Similarly, 71% of students believed there to be excellent applicability to medical practice, and 100% of students thought the timing during first year was excellent.DiscussionWe emphasize the importance of a partnership between CBOs and medical students, thus increasing students' cultural awareness as well as formally involving traditionally disenfranchised communities in medical education. Our project's unique format of safe-space discussion forums and session debriefings enhances critical thinking. Though used with multiple CBOs as an elective, our model can be easily adapted for one session on a specific health disparity.

Dataset Information

Rigor and reproducibility training for first year medical students in research pathways.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets