Methodological framework for radiomics applications in Hodgkin's lymphoma.

ABSTRACT:

Background

According to published data, radiomics features differ between lesions of refractory/relapsing HL patients from those of long-term responders. However, several methodological aspects have not been elucidated yet.

Purpose

The study aimed at setting up a methodological framework in radiomics applications in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), especially at (a) developing a novel feature selection approach, (b) evaluating radiomic intra-patient lesions' similarity, and (c) classifying relapsing refractory (R/R) vs non-(R/R) patients.

Methods

We retrospectively included 85 patients (male:female = 52:33; median age 35 years, range 19-74). LIFEx (www.lifexsoft.org) was used for [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT segmentation and feature extraction. Features were a-priori selected if they were highly correlated or uncorrelated to the volume. Principal component analysis-transformed features were used to build the fingerprints that were tested to assess lesions' similarity, using the silhouette. For intra-patient similarity analysis, we used patients having multiple lesions only. To classify patients as non-R/R and R/R, the fingerprint considering one single lesion (fingerprint_One) and all lesions (fingerprint_All) was tested using Random Undersampling Boosting of Tree Ensemble (RUBTE).

Results

HL fingerprints included up to 15 features. Intra-patient lesion similarity analysis resulted in mean/median silhouette values below 0.5 (low similarity especially in the non-R/R group). In the test set, the fingerprint_One classification accuracy was 62% (78% sensitivity and 53% specificity); the classification by RUBTE using fingerprint_All resulted in 82% accuracy (70% sensitivity and 88% specificity).

Conclusions

Lesion similarity analysis was developed, and it allowed to demonstrate that HL lesions were not homogeneous within patients in terms of radiomics signature. Therefore, a random target lesion selection should not be adopted for radiomics applications. Moreover, the classifier to predict R/R vs non-R/R performed the best when all the lesions were used.

SUBMITTER: Sollini M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8218114 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature