Artificial intelligence-based endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal polyps using residual networks.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Komeda Y
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8219125 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Widespread adoption of optical diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia is prevented by suboptimal endoscopist performance and lack of standardized training and competence evaluation. We aimed to assess diagnostic accuracy of endoscopists in optical diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia in the framework of artificial intelligence (AI) validation studies. Literature searches of databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus) up to April 2022 were performed to identify articles evaluating accuracy of individual endoscopists in performing optical diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia within studies validating AI against a histologically verified ground-truth. The main outcomes were endoscopists' pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV/NPV), positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR) and area under the curve (AUC for sROC) for predicting adenomas versus non-adenomas. Six studies with 67 endoscopists and 2085 (IQR: 115-243,5) patients were evaluated. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for adenomatous histology was respectively 84.5% (95% CI 80.3%-88%) and 83% (95% CI 79.6%-85.9%), corresponding to a PPV, NPV, LR+, LR- of 89.5% (95% CI 87.1%-91.5%), 75.7% (95% CI 70.1%-80.7%), 5 (95% CI 3.9%-6.2%) and 0.19 (95% CI 0.14%-0.25%). The AUC was 0.82 (CI 0.76-0.90). Expert endoscopists showed a higher sensitivity than non-experts (90.5%, [95% CI 87.6%-92.7%] vs. 75.5%, [95% CI 66.5%-82.7%], p < 0.001), and Eastern endoscopists showed a higher sensitivity than Western (85%, [95% CI 80.5%-88.6%] vs. 75.8%, [95% CI 70.2%-80.6%]). Quality was graded high for 3 studies and low for 3 studies. We show that human accuracy for diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia in the setting of AI studies is suboptimal. Educational interventions could benefit by AI validation settings which seem a feasible framework for competence assessment.
| S-EPMC9557953 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and aimsWith the development of artificial intelligence (AI), we have become capable of applying real-time computer-aided detection (CAD) in clinical practice. Our aim is to develop an AI-based CAD-N and optimize its diagnostic performance with narrow-band imaging (NBI) images.MethodsWe developed the CAD-N model with ResNeSt using NBI images for real-time assessment of the histopathology of colorectal polyps (type 1, hyperplastic or inflammatory polyps; type 2, adenomatous polyps, intramucosal cancer, or superficial submucosal invasive cancer; type 3, deep submucosal invasive cancer; and type 4, normal mucosa). We also collected 116 consecutive polyp videos to validate the accuracy of the CAD-N.ResultsA total of 10,573 images (7,032 images from 650 polyps and 3,541 normal mucous membrane images) from 478 patients were finally chosen for analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for each type of the CAD-N in the test set were 89.86%, 97.88%, 93.13%, 96.79%, and 95.93% for type 1; 93.91%, 95.49%, 91.80%, 96.69%, and 94.94% for type 2; 90.21%, 99.29%, 90.21%, 99.29%, and 98.68% for type 3; and 94.86%, 97.28%, 94.73%, 97.35%, and 96.45% for type 4, respectively. The overall accuracy was 93%. We also built models for polyps ≤5 mm, and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for them were 96.81%, 94.08%, 95%, 95.97%, and 95.59%, respectively. Video validation results showed that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the CAD-N were 84.62%, 86.27%, and 85.34%, respectively.ConclusionsWe have developed real-time AI-based histologic classifications of colorectal polyps using NBI images with good accuracy, which may help in clinical management and documentation of optical histology results.
| S-EPMC9128404 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAccurate and robust pathological image analysis for colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis is time-consuming and knowledge-intensive, but is essential for CRC patients' treatment. The current heavy workload of pathologists in clinics/hospitals may easily lead to unconscious misdiagnosis of CRC based on daily image analyses.MethodsBased on a state-of-the-art transfer-learned deep convolutional neural network in artificial intelligence (AI), we proposed a novel patch aggregation strategy for clinic CRC diagnosis using weakly labeled pathological whole-slide image (WSI) patches. This approach was trained and validated using an unprecedented and enormously large number of 170,099 patches, > 14,680 WSIs, from > 9631 subjects that covered diverse and representative clinical cases from multi-independent-sources across China, the USA, and Germany.ResultsOur innovative AI tool consistently and nearly perfectly agreed with (average Kappa statistic 0.896) and even often better than most of the experienced expert pathologists when tested in diagnosing CRC WSIs from multicenters. The average area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of AI was greater than that of the pathologists (0.988 vs 0.970) and achieved the best performance among the application of other AI methods to CRC diagnosis. Our AI-generated heatmap highlights the image regions of cancer tissue/cells.ConclusionsThis first-ever generalizable AI system can handle large amounts of WSIs consistently and robustly without potential bias due to fatigue commonly experienced by clinical pathologists. It will drastically alleviate the heavy clinical burden of daily pathology diagnosis and improve the treatment for CRC patients. This tool is generalizable to other cancer diagnosis based on image recognition.
| S-EPMC7986569 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We aimed to develop a computer-aided diagnostic system (CAD) for predicting colorectal polyp histology using deep-learning technology and to validate its performance. Near-focus narrow-band imaging (NBI) pictures of colorectal polyps were retrieved from the database of our institution. Of these, 12480 image patches of 624 polyps were used as a training set to develop the CAD. The CAD performance was validated with two test datasets of 545 polyps. Polyps were classified into three histological groups: serrated polyp (SP), benign adenoma (BA)/mucosal or superficial submucosal cancer (MSMC), and deep submucosal cancer (DSMC). The overall kappa value measuring the agreement between the true polyp histology and the expected histology by the CAD was 0.614-0.642, which was higher than that of trainees (n = 6, endoscopists with experience of 100 NBI colonoscopies in <6 months; 0.368-0.401) and almost comparable with that of the experts (n = 3, endoscopists with experience of 2,500 NBI colonoscopies in ≥5 years) (0.649-0.735). The areas under the receiver operating curves for CAD were 0.93-0.95, 0.86-0.89, and 0.89-0.91 for SP, BA/MSMC, and DSMC, respectively. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the CAD was 81.3-82.4%, which was significantly higher than that of the trainees (63.8-71.8%, P < 0.01) and comparable with that of experts (82.4-87.3%). The kappa value and diagnostic accuracies of the trainees improved with CAD assistance: that is, the kappa value increased from 0.368 to 0.655, and the overall diagnostic accuracy increased from 63.8-71.8% to 82.7-84.2%. CAD using a deep-learning model can accurately assess polyp histology and may facilitate the diagnosis of colorectal polyps by endoscopists.
| S-EPMC6949236 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Positive diagnoses of gastric tumors from photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) images after the administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid are subjectively identified by expert endoscopists. Objective methods of tumor identification are needed to reduce potential misidentifications. We developed two methods to identify gastric tumors from PDD images. Method one was applied to segmented regions in the PDD endoscopic image to determine the region in LAB color space to be attributed to tumors using a multi-layer neural network. Method two aimed to diagnose tumors and determine regions in the PDD endoscopic image attributed to tumors using the convoluted neural network method. The efficiencies of diagnosing tumors were 77.8% (7/9) and 93.3% (14/15) for method one and method two, respectively. The efficiencies of determining tumor region defined as the ratio of the area were 35.7% (0.0-78.0) and 48.5% (3.0-89.1) for method one and method two, respectively. False-positive rates defined as the ratio of the area were 0.3% (0.0-2.0) and 3.8% (0.0-17.4) for method one and method two, respectively. Objective methods of determining tumor region in 5-aminolevulinic acid-based endoscopic PDD were developed by identifying regions in LAB color space attributed to tumors or by applying a method of convoluted neural network.
| S-EPMC9181250 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Backgroundartificial intelligence (AI) for cellular phenotyping diagnosis of nasal polyps by whole-slide imaging (WSI) is lacking. We aim to establish an AI chronic rhinosinusitis evaluation platform 2.0 (AICEP 2.0) to obtain the proportion of inflammatory cells for cellular phenotyping diagnosis of nasal polyps and to explore the clinical significance of different phenotypes of nasal polyps on the WSI.Methodsa total of 453 patients were enrolled in our study. For the development of AICEP 2.0, 179 patients (WSIs) were obtained from the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University (3HSYSU) from January 2008 to December 2018. A total of 24,625 patches were automatically extracted from the regions of interest under a 400× HPF by Openslide and the number of inflammatory cells in these patches was counted by two pathologists. For the application of AICEP 2.0 in a prospective cohort, 158 patients aged 14-70 years old with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) who had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery at 3HSYSU from June 2020 to December 2020 were included for preoperative demographic characteristics. For the application of AICEP 2.0 in a retrospective cohort, 116 patients with CRSwNP who had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery from May 2016 to June 2017 were enrolled for the recurrence rate. The proportion of inflammatory cells of these patients on WSI was calculated by our AICEP 2.0.Findingsfor AICEP 2.0, the mean absolute errors of the ratios of eosinophils, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and plasma cells were 1.64%, 2.13%, 1.06%, and 1.22%, respectively. The four phenotypes of nasal polyps were significantly different in clinical characteristics (including asthma, itching, sneezing, total IgE, peripheral eosinophils%, tissue eosinophils%, tissue neutrophils%, tissue lymphocytes%, tissue plasma cells%, and recurrence rate; P <0.05), but there were no significant differences in age distribution, onset time, total VAS score, Lund-Kennedy score, or Lund-Mackay score. The percentage of peripheral eosinophils was positively correlated with the percentage of tissue eosinophils (r = 0.560, P <0.001) and negatively correlated with tissue lymphocytes% (r = -0.489, P <0.001), tissue neutrophils% (r = -0.225, P = 0.005), and tissue plasma cells% (r = -0.266, P = 0.001) in WSIs.
| S-EPMC8050855 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceColorectal polyps are common, and their histopathologic classification is used in the planning of follow-up surveillance. Substantial variation has been observed in pathologists' classification of colorectal polyps, and improved assessment by pathologists may be associated with reduced subsequent underuse and overuse of colonoscopy.ObjectiveTo compare standard microscopic assessment with an artificial intelligence (AI)-augmented digital system that annotates regions of interest within digitized polyp tissue and predicts polyp type using a deep learning model to assist pathologists in colorectal polyp classification.Design, setting, and participantsIn this diagnostic study conducted at a tertiary academic medical center and a community hospital in New Hampshire, 100 slides with colorectal polyp samples were read by 15 pathologists using a microscope and an AI-augmented digital system, with a washout period of at least 12 weeks between use of each modality. The study was conducted from February 10 to July 10, 2020.Main outcomes and measuresAccuracy and time of evaluation were used to compare pathologists' performance when a microscope was used with their performance when the AI-augmented digital system was used. Outcomes were compared using paired t tests and mixed-effects models.ResultsIn assessments of 100 slides with colorectal polyp specimens, use of the AI-augmented digital system significantly improved pathologists' classification accuracy compared with microscopic assessment from 73.9% (95% CI, 71.7%-76.2%) to 80.8% (95% CI, 78.8%-82.8%) (P < .001). The overall difference in the evaluation time per slide between the digital system (mean, 21.7 seconds; 95% CI, 20.8-22.7 seconds) and microscopic examination (mean, 13.0 seconds; 95% CI, 12.4-13.5 seconds) was -8.8 seconds (95% CI, -9.8 to -7.7 seconds), but this difference decreased as pathologists became more familiar and experienced with the digital system; the difference between the time of evaluation on the last set of 20 slides for all pathologists when using the microscope and the digital system was 4.8 seconds (95% CI, 3.0-6.5 seconds).Conclusions and relevanceIn this diagnostic study, an AI-augmented digital system significantly improved the accuracy of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps compared with microscopic assessment. If applied broadly to clinical practice, this tool may be associated with decreases in subsequent overuse and underuse of colonoscopy and thus with improved patient outcomes and reduced health care costs.
| S-EPMC8603082 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundColonoscopy reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) by allowing detection and resection of neoplastic polyps. Evidence shows that many small polyps are missed on a single colonoscopy. There has been a successful adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to tackle the issues around missed polyps and as tools to increase the adenoma detection rate (ADR).ObjectiveThe aim of this review was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based technologies in assessing colorectal polyps.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was undertaken using the databases of Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Studies reporting the use of computer-aided diagnosis for polyp detection or characterization during colonoscopy were included. Independent proportions and their differences were calculated and pooled through DerSimonian and Laird random-effects modeling.ResultsA total of 48 studies were included. The meta-analysis showed a significant increase in pooled polyp detection rate in patients with the use of AI for polyp detection during colonoscopy compared with patients who had standard colonoscopy (odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.56-1.96; P<.001). When comparing patients undergoing colonoscopy with the use of AI to those without, there was also a significant increase in ADR (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.32-1.77; P<.001).ConclusionsWith the aid of machine learning, there is potential to improve ADR and, consequently, reduce the incidence of CRC. The current generation of AI-based systems demonstrate impressive accuracy for the detection and characterization of colorectal polyps. However, this is an evolving field and before its adoption into a clinical setting, AI systems must prove worthy to patients and clinicians.Trial registrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020169786; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020169786.
| S-EPMC8319784 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEarly screening and treatment of esophageal cancer (EC) is particularly important for the survival and prognosis of patients. However, early EC is difficult to diagnose by a routine endoscopic examination. Therefore, convolutional neural network (CNN)-based artificial intelligence (AI) has become a very promising method in the diagnosis of early EC using endoscopic images. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CNN-based AI for detecting early EC based on endoscopic images.MethodsA comprehensive search was performed to identify relevant English articles concerning CNN-based AI in the diagnosis of early EC based on endoscopic images (from the date of database establishment to April 2022). The pooled sensitivity (SEN), pooled specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, and area under the curve (AUC) for the accuracy of CNN-based AI in the diagnosis of early EC based on endoscopic images were calculated. We used the I2 test to assess heterogeneity and investigated the source of heterogeneity by performing meta-regression analysis. Publication bias was assessed using Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test.ResultsSeven studies met the eligibility criteria. The SEN and SPE were 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82-0.94) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.79-0.96), respectively. The LR+ of the malignant ultrasonic features was 9.8 (95% CI: 3.8-24.8) and the LR- was 0.11 (95% CI: 0.06-0.21), revealing that CNN-based AI exhibited an excellent ability to confirm or exclude early EC on endoscopic images. Additionally, SROC curves showed that the AUC of the CNN-based AI in the diagnosis of early EC based on endoscopic images was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97), demonstrating that CNN-based AI has good diagnostic value for early EC based on endoscopic images.ConclusionsBased on our meta-analysis, CNN-based AI is an excellent diagnostic tool with high sensitivity, specificity, and AUC in the diagnosis of early EC based on endoscopic images.
| S-EPMC9752541 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most common method for diagnosing gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (SELs); however, it usually requires histopathological confirmation using invasive methods. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have made significant progress in medical imaging diagnosis. The purpose of our research was to explore the application of AI in the diagnosis of SELs using EUS and to evaluate the diagnostic performance of AI-assisted EUS. Three databases, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were comprehensively searched for relevant literature. RevMan 5.4.1 and Stata 17.0, were used to calculate and analyze the combined sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver-operating characteristic curve (SROC). Eight studies were selected from 380 potentially relevant studies for the meta-analysis of AI-aided EUS diagnosis of SELs. The combined sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of AI-aided EUS were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.70-0.87), and 46.27 (95% CI, 19.36-110.59), respectively). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.94). The AI model in differentiating GIST from leiomyoma had a pooled AUC of 0.95, sensitivity of 0.93, specificity of 0.88, PLR of 8.04, and NLR of 0.08. The combined sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the AI-aided EUS diagnosis in the convolutional neural network (CNN) model were 0.93, 0.81, and 0.94, respectively. AI-aided EUS diagnosis using conventional brightness mode (B-mode) EUS images had a combined sensitivity of 0.92, specificity of 0.79, and AUC of 0.92. AI-aided EUS diagnosis based on patients had a combined sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.95, 0.83, and 0.96, respectively. Additionally, AI-aided EUS was superior to EUS by experts in terms of sensitivity (0.93 vs. 0.71), specificity (0.81 vs. 0.69), and AUC (0.94 vs. 0.75). In conclusion, AI-assisted EUS is a promising and reliable method for distinguishing SELs, with excellent diagnostic performance. More multicenter cohort and prospective studies are expected to be conducted to further develop AI-assisted real-time diagnostic systems and validate the superiority of AI systems. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/), identifier CRD42022303990.
| S-EPMC9420906 | biostudies-literature