Dataset Information

Effect of Buffered Local Anesthesia on Perioperative Pain During Arteriovenous Fistula Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

This prospective, pilot randomized double-blind study aimed to compare the effects of buffered and non-buffered xylocaine solutions on injection pain and anesthesia effectiveness in patients undergoing arteriovenous fistula surgery.

Material and methods

A total of 100 adult patients meeting inclusion criteria undergoing arteriovenous fistula surgery were included in the study. They were split into two groups at random. The control group received 1% xylocaine dissolved in 5 ml distilled water, while the intervention group received sodium bicarbonate mixed with 1% xylocaine solution as a local anesthetic. The patients were asked to rate the pain of first and subsequent injections on a visual analog scale (VAS). Besides, the need for extra analgesia was investigated. The mean and standard deviation of the data was determined.

Results

During both the first and subsequent injections, the alkalinized local anesthetic group showed substantially lower VAS scores. In the alkalinized local anesthetic group, anesthesia satisfaction was also more than three times higher. Furthermore, the non-alkalinized group's mean analgesic requirement was higher than the intervention group.

Conclusion

Our findings support the effectiveness of the alkalinized local anesthetic solution in minimizing injection pain and increasing anesthesia duration and overall patient's surgical experience in terms of anesthesia satisfaction score.

SUBMITTER: Arif A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8220251 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectiveThoracic surgery causes significant pain which can negatively affect pulmonary function and increase risk of postoperative complications. Effective analgesia is important to reduce splinting and atelectasis. Systemic opioids and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) have been used for decades and are effective at treating acute post-thoracotomy pain, although both have risks and adverse effects. The advancement of thoracoscopic surgery, a focus on multimodal and opioid-sparing analgesics, and the development of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques have greatly expanded the options for acute pain management after thoracic surgery. Despite the expansion of surgical techniques and analgesic approaches, there is no clear optimal approach to pain management. This review aims to summarize the body of literature regarding systemic and regional anesthetic techniques for thoracic surgery in both thoracotomy and minimally invasive approaches, with a goal of providing a foundation for providers to make individualized decisions for patients depending on surgical approach and patient factors, and to discuss avenues for future research.MethodsWe searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases from inception to May 2021 using the terms "thoracic surgery", "thoracic surgery AND pain management", "thoracic surgery AND analgesia", "thoracic surgery AND regional anesthesia", "thoracic surgery AND epidural". We considered articles written in English and available to the reader.Key content and findingsThere is a wide variety of strategies for treating acute pain after thoracic surgery, including multimodal opioid and non-opioid systemic analgesics, regional anesthesia including TEA and paravertebral blocks (PVB), and a recent expansion in the use of novel fascial plane blocks especially for thoracoscopy. The body of literature on the effectiveness of different approaches for thoracotomy and thoracoscopy is a rapidly expanding field and area of active debate.ConclusionsThe optimal analgesic approach for thoracic surgery may depend on patient factors, surgical factors, and institutional factors. Although TEA may provide optimal analgesia after thoracotomy, PVB and emerging fascial plane blocks may offer effective alternatives. A tailored approach using multimodal systemic therapies and regional anesthesia is important, and future studies comparing techniques are necessary to further investigate the optimal approach to improve patient outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundRegional anesthesia improves short-term blood flow through arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs). We previously demonstrated that, compared with local anesthesia, regional anesthesia improves primary AVF patency at 3 months.MethodsTo study the effects of regional versus local anesthesia on longer-term AVF patency, we performed an observer-blinded randomized controlled trial at three university hospitals in Glasgow, United Kingdom. We randomly assigned 126 patients undergoing primary radiocephalic or brachiocephalic AVF creation to receive regional anesthesia (brachial plexus block; 0.5% L-bupivacaine and 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine) or local anesthesia (0.5% L-bupivacaine and 1% lidocaine). This report includes findings on primary, functional, and secondary patency at 12 months; reinterventions; and additional access procedures (primary outcome measures were previously reported). We analyzed data by intention to treat, and also performed cost-effectiveness analyses.ResultsAt 12 months, we found higher primary patency among patients receiving regional versus local anesthesia (50 of 63 [79%] versus 37 of 63 [59%] patients; odds ratio [OR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.6 to 3.8; P=0.02) as well as higher functional patency (43 of 63 [68%] versus 31 of 63 [49%] patients; OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.7; P=0.008). In 12 months, 21 revisional procedures, 53 new AVFs, and 50 temporary dialysis catheters were required. Regional anesthesia resulted in net savings of £195.10 (US$237.36) per patient at 1 year, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of approximately £12,900 (US$15,694.20) per quality-adjusted life years over a 5-year time horizon. Results were robust after extensive sensitivity and scenario analyses.ConclusionsCompared with local anesthesia, regional anesthesia significantly improved both primary and functional AVF patency at 1 year and is cost-effective.Clinical trial registry name and registration numberLocal Anaesthesia versus Regional Block for Arteriovenous Fistulae, NCT01706354.