Dataset Information

Common Physical Examination Tests for Patellofemoral Instability Demonstrate Weak Inter-Rater Reliability.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the inter-rater reliability of 3 common physical examination assessments, the Q-angle, J-sign, and apprehension test, used to evaluate patients presenting with recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability.

Methods

A consecutive sample of 38 subjects with recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability in 2013 were included in this reliability study. Two orthopaedic surgeons performed the physical examination maneuvers blinded to each other. The physical examination tests were performed bilaterally and included the Q angle, the J-sign, and the apprehension test. To measure the inter-rater reliability, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2,κ) was used for both legs independently for Q-angle measurements. A Cohen's kappa was used to measure the inter-rater reliability for the J-sign and the apprehension test.

Results

The measurement of the Q-angle demonstrated poor reliability (ICC 2,κ 0.18-0.44). The assessment of the J-sign demonstrated fair to moderate reliability (κ = 0.31 - 0.41), and the evaluation of apprehension demonstrated fair to substantial reliability (κ = 0.30 - 0.65). All 3 clinical tests demonstrated substantial variability comparing the reliability on the right and left limbs. Assessment of the quality of apprehension demonstrated good agreement between the examiners.

Conclusions

In this study of patients with recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability the common physical examination tests, Q-angle, J-sign, and apprehension demonstrated weak inter-rater reliability. These results indicate that these tests are not reliable for communication between health care practitioners or as evaluations for clinical research.

Level of evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

SUBMITTER: Hiemstra LA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8220568 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionClinicians rely on certain physical examination tests to diagnose and potentially grade ankle sprains and ankle instability. Diagnostic error and inaccurate prognosis may have important repercussions for clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. Therefore, it is important to recognize the diagnostic value of orthopaedic tests through understanding the reliability and validity of these tests.ObjectiveTo systematically review and report evidence on the reliability and validity of orthopaedic tests for the diagnosis of ankle sprains and instability.MethodsPubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to December 2021. In addition, the reference list of included studies, located systematic reviews, and orthopaedic textbooks were searched. All articles reporting reliability or validity of physical examination or orthopaedic tests to diagnose ankle instability or sprains were included. Methodological quality of the reliability and the validity studies was assessed with The Quality Appraisal for Reliability studies checklist and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 respectively. We identified the number of times the orthopaedic test was investigated and the validity and/or reliability of each test.ResultsOverall, sixteen studies were included. Three studies assessed reliability, eight assessed validity, and five evaluated both. Overall, fifteen tests were evaluated, none demonstrated robust reliability and validity scores. The anterolateral talar palpation test reported the highest diagnostic accuracy. Further, the anterior drawer test, the anterolateral talar palpation, the reverse anterior lateral drawer test, and palpation of the anterior talofibular ligament reported the highest sensitivity. The highest specificity was attributed to the anterior drawer test, the anterolateral drawer test, the reverse anterior lateral drawer test, tenderness on palpation of the proximal fibular, and the squeeze test.ConclusionOverall, the diagnostic accuracy, reliability, and validity of physical examination tests for the assessment of ankle instability were limited. Physical examination tests should not be used in isolation, but rather in combination with the clinical history to diagnose an ankle sprain. Preliminary evidence suggests that the overall validity of physical examination for the ankle may be better if conducted five days after the injury rather than within 48 h of injury.