Dataset Information

The Effect of Patient and Surgical Factors on Opioid Prescription Requests Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To determine whether differences in total morphine equivalent doses (MEDs) prescribed after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) existed because of age younger than or older than 55 years and sex and to characterize potential risk factors for needing an opioid medication refill, visiting a provider other than the surgeon (either in the emergency department or ambulatory settings), and postoperative pain control requiring opioids approximately 6 weeks from the date of surgery.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 100 patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR between July 1, 2018, to November 30, 2018, in a single institution was performed. Data including demographics, perioperative treatments, and postoperative opioid prescriptions were recorded. Our primary hypotheses were evaluated with the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Univariate and multivariate analyses assessed potential risk factors for the 3 outcomes of interest. Results were given in adjusted odds ratios (aORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and P values.

Results

There was a difference (P = .038) in total MEDs used (in 5 mg oxycodone tablets) between males (median 56 tablets; interquartile range, 50-98 tablets) and females (median 78 tablets; interquartile range, 56-116 tablets). Age younger than 55 years was a risk factor for seeking an opioid refill (OR = 2.51; CI, 1.11-5.66; P = .026). A significant risk factor for visiting another provider was preoperative opiate use (OR = 15.0; CI, 1.79-125.8; P = .013). Age younger than than 55 years (aOR = 2.51; CI, 1.01-6.02; P = .047), body mass index (aOR = 1.08; CI, 1.01-1.17; P = .046), and shorter surgical duration (aOR = 0.97; CI, 0.95-0.99, P =.007) were independent predictive factors for requiring opioids for pain control 6 weeks after surgery.

Conclusions

After arthroscopic RCR, MED prescription is higher for females than males. The risk factors for requesting opioid prescription refill for pain control 6 weeks after surgery were age younger than 55 years and shorter surgical duration.

Level of evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

SUBMITTER: Sridharan M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8220602 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo determine whether patients who require margin convergence would have equivalent postsurgical patient-determined scores compared with patients with standard rotator cuff repair. The secondary purpose of this study was to determine whether the short-term results found for patients with margin convergence repairs would be durable through medium-term follow-up.MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was performed to examine the effects of marginal convergence on patient-determined outcomes (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and Shoulder Activity Level). Patient-determined outcomes in patients who had margin convergence repairs were compared with patients who had standard rotator cuff repair. Prospective follow-up of patients that had margin convergence repairs was performed to determine whether patient-determined outcomes deteriorated over time.ResultsTwo-hundred-seventy-two patients had standard rotator cuff repairs and 9 patients had margin convergence rotator cuff repair (3.2%). All patients had significant improvements in their Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation. Patients requiring margin convergence rotator cuff repair had similar preoperative and postoperative scores compared with patients with a standard rotator cuff repair. At a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, there was no change in outcome scores compared with the early follow-up time point (mean 3.3 years) for patients undergoing margin convergence.ConclusionsArthroscopic margin convergence repair techniques along with the treatment of concomitant pathologies result in similar patient-determined outcomes compared with standard rotator cuff repair techniques. These results appear to be durable and do not deteriorate from short-term to medium-term follow-up.Level of evidenceIII: Retrospective comparative study.

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate patient use of opioids following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, including the number of days and number of pills when used in combination with non-opioid medications and to determine whether patients were satisfied with their pain management and if variables such as age, sex, body mass index, duration of symptoms, anticipation of postoperative pain, preoperative opioid consumption, size of the rotator cuff tear, or anxiety/depression affected pain management.MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study of 117 prospectively enrolled patients older than the age of 18 years undergoing primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. All patients completed preoperative and 2-week postoperative questionnaires to assess their pain and satisfaction with pain management. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the association of patient characteristics with satisfaction of pain control and amount/duration of opioids postoperatively.ResultsPatients required a median of 18 opioid pain pills or 135 morphine milligram equivalents (interquartiles, 6-35 pills) postoperatively over 6.9 ± 5.1 days. In total, 65% of patients took opioid pain medications for 7 days or fewer. On postoperative day 2, patients reported a VAS pain score of 6.6 ± 2.8 and at the 2-week postoperative visit, mean visual analog scale pain score was 3.5 ± 2.5. Differences in age, sex, body mass index, duration of symptoms, anticipation of postoperative pain, preoperative 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire, 2-item Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, current opioid use, and surgical characteristics had no effect on, or association with, satisfaction with pain management postoperatively.ConclusionsFollowing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, patients can achieve satisfactory pain control using a multimodal approach with a median of 18 opioid pills (range 6-35 pills) over 6.9 ± 5.1 days when used in combination with non-opioid pain medications. Overall, 74.4% of patients were satisfied with their postoperative pain management.Level of evidenceLevel II; Prospective cohort study.

Project description:Purpose To compare patient-reported and surgical outcome measures in patients with and without secondary shoulder stiffness (SSS) undergoing rotator cuff repair (RCR). Methods Patients undergoing rotator cuff repair from 2014 to 2020 with complete patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by the short-form 12 survey (SF-12) were retrospectively reviewed to identify if operative intervention for SSS was performed alongside the RCR. Those patients with operative intervention for SSS were propensity matched to a group without prior intervention for stiffness by age, sex, laterality, body mass index, diabetes mellitus status, and the presence of a thyroid disorder. The groups were compared by rotator cuff tear (RCT) size, surgical outcomes, further surgical intervention, rotator cuff retear rate, postoperative range of motion (ROM), and SF-12 results at 1 year after surgery. Delta values were calculated for component scores of the SF-12 and ROM values by subtracting the preoperative result from the postoperative result. Results A total of 89 patients with SSS were compared to 156 patients in the control group at final analysis. The patients in the SSS group experienced a significant improvement in the delta mental health component score (MCS-12) of the SF-12 survey that was not seen in the control group (P = .005 to P = .539). Both groups experienced significant improvement by the delta physical health component score (PCS-12) of the SF-12 survey (SSS: 7.68; P < .001; control: 6.95; P < .001). The SSS group also experienced greater improvement of their forward flexion (25.8° vs 12.9°; P = .005) and external rotation (7.13° vs 1.65°; P = .031) ROM than the control group. Conclusions Operative intervention of SSS at the time of RCR has equivalent postoperative SF-12 survey outcome scores when compared to patients undergoing RCR without preoperative stiffness despite those patients having lower preoperative scores. Level of Evidence Level III retrospective comparative study.