Dataset Information

Orthopaedic Resident Arthroscopic Knot-Tying Skills Are Improved Using a Training Program and Knot-Tying Workstation.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To quantify an orthopaedic trainee's ability to tie arthroscopic knots before and after a short cadaveric-based arthroscopy training period using a commercially available knot-tying workstation.

Methods

During a weeklong cadaveric arthroscopic training camp, 15 third- and fourth-year orthopaedic residents were evaluated using a commercially available benchtop knot-tying workstation. At the beginning of the week (baseline), each participant was asked to tie 3 knots of his or her choice backed up by 3 half-hitches using nonabsorbable suture. Successful knots fit the sizer and elongated less than 3 mm after application of a 15-lb load. Afterward, residents watched a video demonstrating a sample knot and were encouraged to practice over the ensuing days. At the end of the week (post-training), residents were asked to tie 3 knots. The time to completion and success of each knot were recorded. To compare baseline and post-training knot success, t tests and χ² analysis were performed.

Results

During baseline testing, residents successfully tied 26.7% of their knots (12 of 45 knots) in 352 ± 116 seconds (mean ± standard deviation). During post-training testing, residents successfully tied 66.7% of knots (30 of 45 knots, P = .00014) in 294 ± 63 seconds (P = .023), showing significant improvement in the time and ability to tie arthroscopic knots.

Conclusions

With a short cadaveric-based training period, orthopaedic trainees showed a significant improvement in their ability to tie arthroscopic knots on a commercially available benchtop knot-tying workstation. Given the initial low percentage of successfully tied knots and the limited opportunities for trainees to improve, trainees should be encouraged to practice and improve their skills.

Clinical relevance

With training, residents can improve arthroscopic knot-tying abilities, which may allow them to successfully perform this critical task in the operating room.

SUBMITTER: Otlans PT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8220621 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:Training of basic laparoscopic psychomotor skills improves the acquisition of more advanced laparoscopic tasks, such as laparoscopic intra-corporeal knot tying (LICK). This randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate whether pre-training of basic skills, as laparoscopic camera navigation (LCN), hand-eye coordination (HEC), and bimanual coordination (BMC), and the combination of the three of them, has any beneficial effect upon the learning curve of LICK. The study was carried out in a private center in Asunción, Paraguay, by 80 medical students without any experience in surgery. Four laparoscopic tasks were performed in the ENCILAP model (LCN, HEC, BMC, and LICK). Participants were allocated to 5 groups (G1-G5). The study was structured in 5 phases. In phase 1, they underwent a base-line test (T1) for all tasks (1 repetition of each task in consecutive order). In phase 2, participants underwent different training programs (30 consecutive repetitions) for basic tasks according to the group they belong to (G1: none; G2: LCN; G3: HEC; G4: BMC; and G5: LCN, HEC, and BMC). In phase 3, they were tested again (T2) in the same manner than at T1. In phase 4, they underwent a standardized training program for LICK (30 consecutive repetitions). In phase 5, they were tested again (T3) in the same manner than at T1 and T2. At each repetition, scoring was based on the time taken for task completion system. Results:The scores were plotted and non-linear regression models were used to fit the learning curves to one- and two-phase exponential decay models for each participant (individual curves) and for each group (group curves). The LICK group learning curves fitted better to the two-phase exponential decay model. From these curves, the starting points (Y0), the point after HEC training/before LICK training (Y1), the Plateau, and the rate constants (K) were calculated. All groups, except for G4, started from a similar point (Y0). At Y1, G5 scored already better than the others (G1 p?=?.004; G2 p?=?.04; G3 p?<?.0001; G4 NS). Although all groups reached a similar Plateau, G5 has a quicker learning than the others, demonstrated by a higher K (G1 p?<?0.0001; G2 p?<?0.0001; G3 p?<?0.0001; and G4 p?<?0.0001). Conclusions:Our data confirms that training improves laparoscopic skills and demonstrates that pre-training of all basic skills (i.e., LCN, HEC, and BMC) shortens the LICK learning curve.

Project description:BackgroundKnot-tying suture-bridge (SB) rotator cuff repair may compromise the vascularity of the repaired tendon, causing tendon strangulation and medial repair failure. The knotless SB repair technique has been proposed to overcome this possibility and decrease retear rates.PurposeTo compare clinical and structural outcomes and retear patterns between the knot-tying and knotless SB techniques. We hypothesized that the knotless technique would result in lower retear rates owing to the preservation of intratendinous vascularity.Study designRandomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.MethodsA total of 104 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were randomly and prospectively allocated to undergo knot-tying (group 1) or knotless (group 2) SB repair. Clinical outcome measures included range of motion, the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and the Constant score for function. Repair integrity was evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging scans using the Sugaya classification. Retears were also classified according to their pattern as type 1 (lateral) or type 2 (medial).ResultsOverall, 88 patients (group 1: n = 42 [mean ± SD age, 54.3 ± 9.8 years]; group 2: n = 46 [mean ± SD age, 55.8 ± 8.2 years]) were included in the final analysis. The mean ± SD follow-up period was 25.4 ± 8.3 and 23.3 ± 7.2 months for groups 1 and 2, respectively. From preoperatively to postoperatively, the mean VAS pain score improved significantly in both groups (group 1: from 7.4 ± 1.7 to 1.0 ± 1.7; group 2: from 7.1 ± 1.9 to 1.3 ± 2.0; P < .0001 for both), as did the mean ± SD Constant score (group 1: from 51.7 ± 13.4 to 86.0 ± 11.5; group 2: from 49.4 ± 18.4 to 87.2 ± 14.8; P < .0001 for both). There was no significant difference between the groups for the postoperative VAS or Constant score. The retear rate was not significantly different between the groups (19.0% [8/42] in group 1 and 28.3% [13/46] in group 2; P > .05). There was a significant difference in the type 2 failure rate (75.0% [6/8] in group 1 and 23.1% [3/13] in group 2; P = .03).ConclusionBoth techniques showed excellent improvement and comparable clinical outcomes, and there was no significant difference in retear rates. Consistent with previously published data, the type 2 failure rate was significantly higher with the knot-tying technique.RegistrationNCT03982108 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).