Dataset Information

Indications and Outcomes After Ligamentum Teres Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To systematically review the literature to better understand the current indications for ligamentum teres reconstruction (LTR), current graft and acetabular fixation options used, patient-reported outcomes after LTR, and incidence of complications and reoperations after LTR.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. All literature related to LTR published prior to July 2020 was identified. The inclusion criteria consisted of investigations reporting on human patients with pathology of the ligamentum teres who underwent LTR, including mentions of the indications, graft type, acetabular fixation method, postoperative patient-reported outcome scores, and incidence of complications and reoperations.

Results

Seven studies comprising 26 patients (28 hips) were included. The most commonly reported indication for LTR was persistent pain and instability after failed prior hip arthroscopy (68%, 19 of 28 hips). The mean postoperative modified Harris Hip Score, Non-arthritic Hip Score, and visual analog scale score all showed improvement when compared with preoperative values. A total of 2 complications occurred. Complication rates ranged from 0% to 100% in included case reports and 0% to 11% in included case series. A total of 9 reoperations were performed. Reoperation rates ranged from 0% to 100% for case reports and 18% to 100% for case series. Reoperation rates ranged from 33% to 100% in studies with patients receiving acetabular fixation using anchors versus 0% to 22% in studies performing LTR with buttons. Reoperation rates in athletic patients and patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome ranged from 0% to 100% and 0% to 50%, respectively.

Conclusions

The main indication for LTR was persistent hip or groin pain and instability after a prior hip arthroscopy. The short-term postoperative modified Harris Hip Score, Non-arthritic Hip Score, and visual analog scale score after LTR showed favorable outcomes. However, reoperations after LTR were not uncommon.

Level of evidence

Level V, systematic review of Level IV and V studies.

SUBMITTER: Knapik DM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8220633 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo retrospectively evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of ligamentum teres (LT) lesions identified in a single-surgeon hip arthroscopy cohort and to compare surgical outcomes of those with, and without, identified LT lesions.MethodsPatients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy between 2005 and 2018 in one surgeon's clinic were identified. Those with a history involving extra-articular scoping or any previous surgery on the ipsilateral hip were excluded. Patient-reported outcome measures completed before and after surgery included the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, and 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool. Conversion to hip joint replacement was ascertained through a national register.ResultsA total of 1,935 primary hip arthroscopies (from 1,607 different patients) were included in this study. In total, 323 LT lesions were identified. Those with LT lesions were older than those without (40.3 ± 11.3 years compared with 33.9 ± 12.1 years; P < .001), and more frequently female (58.2% vs 41.8%; P = .001). Hips with lesions had a smaller lateral center-edge angle than other hips (33.0 ± 6.8° vs 34.1 ± 6.0°; P = .004). All patient-reported outcome measures improved significantly (P < .001) from pre- to post-surgery for patients with and without LT lesions. However, patients with LT lesions reported less improvement in the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (difference -5.60; P = .004) and in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score symptoms (-4.41; P = .004), sports (-7.81; P < .001), and quality of life subscales (-8.85; P < .001) than those without lesions. Hips with LT lesions also had a 6.2% 2-year rate of subsequent hip replacement (20/323 hips) compared with those without lesions (0.9%; 14/1612 hips; P < .001).ConclusionsIn this single-surgeon hip arthroscopy cohort, identification of LT lesions was associated with poorer patient-reported outcomes and increased likelihood of conversion to arthroplasty within 2 years. These findings suggest a poorer prognosis for patients with LT injury compared with those without.Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective cohort study.