Dataset Information

Surgical management of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein thrombosis: The United States Safety Net and Academic Center Collaborative Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Although consensus guidelines generally discourage any surgical management (ASM; i.e., resection and/or transplantation) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT), recent series from Asia have challenged this paradigm.

Methods

Patients from the US Safety Net Collaborative database (2012-2014) with localized HCC and radiographically confirmed PVT were propensity-score matched based on demographic and clinicopathologic factors associated with receipt of ASM and overall survival (OS). OS was compared between patients undergoing ASM and those not selected for surgery.

Results

Of 1910 HCC patients, 207 (14.5%) had localized disease and PVT. The majority received either liver-directed therapies (LDTs; 34%) and/or targeted systemic therapies (36%). Twenty-one patients (10.1%) underwent ASM (resection [n = 11], transplantation [n = 10]); a third experienced any complication with no 30-day mortalities. Independent predictors of undergoing ASM were younger age, recent hepatology consultation, and lower model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. After matching for age, comorbidities, MELD, tumor size, receipt of LDT, or systemic therapy, OS was significantly longer for patients selected for ASM versus non-ASM patients (median not reached vs. 5.8 months, p < .001).

Conclusion

In a large North American multi-institutional cohort, a minority of HCC patients with PVT were selected for ASM. Resection or transplantation was associated with improved survival and may have a role in the multimodality management in selected patients.

SUBMITTER: Ryon EL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8221282 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHepatic portal vein collateral circulation plays an important role in maintaining the perfusion of hepatic portal vein. However, at present, there is little research on collateral circulation of hepatic portal vein. Our study aims to analysis the imaging types and clinical value of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) invading and completely blocking different branches of portal vein, secondary to hepatic portal vein collateral circulation.MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with PVTT diagnosed with enhanced CT examination of the upper abdomen in our hospital from May 2020 to October 2021.The inclusion criteria for patients were the following: (I) ultimately diagnosed with HCC, (II) accompanied by complete obstruction of the main portal vein or left/right branches, and (III) with collateral circulation of the hepatic portal vein established. All images were postprocessed by multiplanar reconstruction (MPR), maximum intensity projection (MIP), and other reconstruction techniques to obtain images of the abnormal portal vein system and the collateral vessels running toward the hepatic portal veins. Three physicians jointly judged the imaging anatomical classification of each collateral vessel. The qualitative variables were compared by chi-squared test.ResultsA total of 125 hepatic portal vein collateral vessels were observed in MPR and MIP reconstruction images of 71 patients with portal vein cancer thrombosis with established hepatic portal vein collateral circulation. Common hepatic collateral branches in patients with PVTT mainly include the biliary collateral branch, gastric collateral branch, mesenteric collateral branch, accessory portal vein system and the splenic branch. The incidence rate was respectively 77.5%, 36.6%, 32.4%, 28.2%, 1.41%.ConclusionsThe correct understanding of the imaging anatomical classification of the collateral vessels of the hepatic portal vein can provide clinicians with more information for diagnosis and treatment planning.