Dataset Information

Expected Versus Experienced Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients Recovering From Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

ABSTRACT: Patient expectations of the impact of surgery on postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQL) may reflect the effectiveness of patient-provider communication. We sought to compare expected versus experienced HRQL among patients undergoing cancer surgery.

Methods

Adults undergoing cancer surgery were eligible for inclusion (2017-2019). Preoperatively, patients completed a smartphone-based survey assessing expectations for HRQL 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively based on the 8 short-form 36 (SF36) domains (physical functioning, physical role limitations, pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role limitations, and mental health). Experienced HRQL was then assessed through smartphone-based SF36 surveys 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Correlations between 1- and 6-month trends in expected versus experienced HRQL were determined.

Results

Among 101 consenting patients, 74 completed preoperative expectations and SF36 surveys (73%). The mean age was 54 years (SD 14), 49 (66%) were female, and the most common operations were for breast (34%) and abdominal (31%) tumors. Patients expected HRQL to worsen 1 week after surgery and improve toward minimal disability over 6 months. There was poor correlation (≤±0.4) between 1- and 6-month trends in expected versus experienced HRQL in all SF36 domains except for moderate correlation in physical functioning (0.50, 95% confidence interval [0.22-0.78], P < 0.001) and physical role limitations (0.41, 95% confidence interval [0.05-0.77], P = 0.024). Patients expected better HRQL than they experienced.

Conclusions

Preoperative expectations of postoperative HRQL correlated poorly with lived experiences except in physical health domains. Surgeons should evaluate factors which inform expectations around physical and psychosocial health and use these data to enhance shared decision-making.

SUBMITTER: Panda N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8221715 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVES:To assess the health burden of breast hypertrophy and the comparative effectiveness of breast reduction surgery in improving health-related quality of life. DESIGN:Prospective cohort study. SETTING:A major public tertiary care hospital in Australia. PARTICIPANTS:Women with symptomatic breast hypertrophy who underwent breast reduction surgery were followed for 12 months. A comparison control cohort comprised women with breast hypertrophy who did not undergo surgery. INTERVENTIONS:Bilateral breast reduction surgery for women in the surgical cohort. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The primary outcome measure was health-related quality of life measured preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures included post-surgical complications. RESULTS:209 patients in the surgical cohort completed questionnaires before and after surgery. 124 patients in the control hypertrophy cohort completed baseline and 12-month follow-up questionnaires. At baseline, both groups had significantly lower scores compared with population norms across all scales (p<0.001). In the surgical cohort significant improvements were seen across all eight SF-36 scales (p<0.001) following surgery. Within 3 months of surgery scores were equivalent to those of the normal population and this improvement was sustained at 12 months. SF-36 physical and mental component scores both significantly improved following surgery, with a mean change of 10.2 and 9.2 points, respectively (p<0.001). In contrast, SF-36 scores for breast hypertrophy controls remained at baseline across 12 months. The improvement in quality of life was independent of breast resection weight and body mass index. CONCLUSION:Breast reduction significantly improved quality of life in women with breast hypertrophy. This increase was most pronounced within 3?months of surgery and sustained at 12-month follow-up. This improvement in quality of life is comparable to other widely accepted surgical procedures. Furthermore, women benefit from surgery regardless of factors including body mass index and resection weight.