Dataset Information

A novel computer-aided diagnostic system for accurate detection and grading of liver tumors.

ABSTRACT: Liver cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the world. The primary goals of this manuscript are the identification of novel imaging markers (morphological, functional, and anatomical/textural), and development of a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) system to accurately detect and grade liver tumors non-invasively. A total of 95 patients with liver tumors (M = 65, F = 30, age range = 34-82 years) were enrolled in the study after consents were obtained. 38 patients had benign tumors (LR1 = 19 and LR2 = 19), 19 patients had intermediate tumors (LR3), and 38 patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) malignant tumors (LR4 = 19 and LR5 = 19). A multi-phase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) was collected to extract the imaging markers. A comprehensive CAD system was developed, which includes the following main steps: i) estimation of morphological markers using a new parametric spherical harmonic model, ii) estimation of textural markers using a novel rotation invariant gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and gray-level run-length matrix (GLRLM) models, and iii) calculation of the functional markers by estimating the wash-in/wash-out slopes, which enable quantification of the enhancement characteristics across different CE-MR phases. These markers were subsequently processed using a two-stages random forest-based classifier to classify the liver tumor as benign, intermediate, or malignant and determine the corresponding grade (LR1, LR2, LR3, LR4, or LR5). The overall CAD system using all the identified imaging markers achieved a sensitivity of 91.8%±0.9%, specificity of 91.2%±1.9%, and F[Formula: see text] score of 0.91±0.01, using the leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) cross-validation approach. Importantly, the CAD system achieved overall accuracies of [Formula: see text], 85%±2%, 78%±3%, 83%±4%, and 79%±3% in grading liver tumors into LR1, LR2, LR3, LR4, and LR5, respectively. In addition to LOSO, the developed CAD system was tested using randomly stratified 10-fold and 5-fold cross-validation approaches. Alternative classification algorithms, including support vector machine, naive Bayes classifier, k-nearest neighbors, and linear discriminant analysis all produced inferior results compared to the proposed two stage random forest classification model. These experiments demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed CAD system as a novel tool to objectively assess liver tumors based on the new comprehensive imaging markers. The identified imaging markers and CAD system can be used as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for early and accurate detection and grading of liver cancer.

SUBMITTER: Alksas A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8222341 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDiagnosis of pneumonia is critical in managing patients with febrile neutropenia (FN), however, chest X-ray (CXR) has limited performance in the detection of pneumonia. We aimed to evaluate the performance of a deep learning-based computer-aided detection (CAD) system in pneumonia detection in the CXRs of consecutive FN patients and investigated whether CAD could improve radiologists' diagnostic performance when used as a second reader.MethodsCXRs of patients with FN (a body temperature ≥ 38.3 °C, or a sustained body temperature ≥ 38.0 °C for an hour; absolute neutrophil count < 500/mm3) obtained between January and December 2017 were consecutively included, from a single tertiary referral hospital. Reference standards for the diagnosis of pneumonia were defined by consensus of two thoracic radiologists after reviewing medical records and CXRs. A commercialized, deep learning-based CAD system was retrospectively applied to detect pulmonary infiltrates on CXRs. For comparing performance, five radiologists independently interpreted CXRs initially without the CAD results (radiologist-alone interpretation), followed by the interpretation with CAD. The sensitivities and specificities for detection of pneumonia were compared between radiologist-alone interpretation and interpretation with CAD. The standalone performance of the CAD was also evaluated, using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Moreover, sensitivity and specificity of standalone CAD were compared with those of radiologist-alone interpretation.ResultsAmong 525 CXRs from 413 patients (52.3% men; median age 59 years), pneumonia was diagnosed in 128 (24.4%) CXRs. In the interpretation with CAD, average sensitivity of radiologists was significantly improved (75.4% to 79.4%, P = 0.003) while their specificity remained similar (75.4% to 76.8%, P = 0.101), compared to radiologist-alone interpretation. The CAD exhibited AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.895, 88.3%, and 68.3%, respectively. The standalone CAD exhibited higher sensitivity (86.6% vs. 75.2%, P < 0.001) and lower specificity (64.8% vs. 75.4%, P < 0.001) compared to radiologist-alone interpretation.ConclusionsIn patients with FN, the deep learning-based CAD system exhibited radiologist-level performance in detecting pneumonia on CXRs and enhanced radiologists' performance.

Project description:After the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved computer-aided detection (CAD) for mammography in 1998, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) provided increased payment in 2002, CAD technology disseminated rapidly. Despite sparse evidence that CAD improves accuracy of mammographic interpretations and costs over $400 million a year, CAD is currently used for most screening mammograms in the United States.To measure performance of digital screening mammography with and without CAD in US community practice.We compared the accuracy of digital screening mammography interpreted with (n = 495 818) vs without (n = 129 807) CAD from 2003 through 2009 in 323 973 women. Mammograms were interpreted by 271 radiologists from 66 facilities in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Linkage with tumor registries identified 3159 breast cancers in 323 973 women within 1 year of the screening.Mammography performance (sensitivity, specificity, and screen-detected and interval cancers per 1000 women) was modeled using logistic regression with radiologist-specific random effects to account for correlation among examinations interpreted by the same radiologist, adjusting for patient age, race/ethnicity, time since prior mammogram, examination year, and registry. Conditional logistic regression was used to compare performance among 107 radiologists who interpreted mammograms both with and without CAD.Screening performance was not improved with CAD on any metric assessed. Mammography sensitivity was 85.3% (95% CI, 83.6%-86.9%) with and 87.3% (95% CI, 84.5%-89.7%) without CAD. Specificity was 91.6% (95% CI, 91.0%-92.2%) with and 91.4% (95% CI, 90.6%-92.0%) without CAD. There was no difference in cancer detection rate (4.1 in 1000 women screened with and without CAD). Computer-aided detection did not improve intraradiologist performance. Sensitivity was significantly decreased for mammograms interpreted with vs without CAD in the subset of radiologists who interpreted both with and without CAD (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.97).Computer-aided detection does not improve diagnostic accuracy of mammography. These results suggest that insurers pay more for CAD with no established benefit to women.

Dataset Information

A novel computer-aided diagnostic system for accurate detection and grading of liver tumors.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets