Dataset Information

'Missingness' in health care: Associations between hospital utilization and missed appointments in general practice. A retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Are multiple missed appointments in general practice associated with increased use of hospital services and missingness from hospital care? This novel study explores this in a population representative sample for the first time.

Design, setting, participants

A large, retrospective cohort (n = 824,374) of patient records from a nationally representative sample of GP practices, Scotland, 2013-2016. Requested data were extracted by a Trusted Third Party for the NHS, anonymised and linked to a unique patient ID, in the NHS Safehaven for analysis using established NHS Scotland linkage. We calculated the per-patient number of GP missed appointments from individual appointments and investigated the likelihood of hospital appointment or admission outcomes using a negative binomial model offset by number of GP appointments made. These models also controlled for age, sex, Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) and number of long- term conditions (LTCs).

Main outcome measures

Hospital attendance: Outpatient clinic attendances; hospital admissions; Emergency Department (ED) attendances. Hospital missingness: 'Did not attend' (DNAs) outpatient clinic appointments, 'irregular discharges' from admissions, and 'left before care completed' ED care episodes.

Results

Attendance: Patients in the high missed GP appointment (HMA) category were higher users of outpatient services (rate ratio (RR) 1.90, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.88-1.93) compared to those who missed none (NMA) with a much higher attendance risk at mental health services (RR 4.56, 95% CI 4.31-4.83). HMA patients were more likely to be admitted to hospital; general admissions (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.65-1.68), maternity (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.20-1.28) and mental health (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.15-1.31), compared to NMA patients. Missing GP appointments was not associated with ED attendance; (RR 1.00, CI 0.99-1.01). Missingness: HMA patients were at greater risk of missing outpatient appointments (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.60-1.64) than NMA patients; with a much higher risk of non-attendance at mental health services (RR 7.83, 95% CI 7.35-8.35). Patients were more likely to leave hospital before their care plan was completed-taking 'irregular discharges' (RR 4.56, 95% CI 4.31-4.81). HMA patients were no more at risk of leaving emergency departments 'without care being completed' (RR1.02, 95 CI 0.95-1.09).

Conclusions

Patients who miss high numbers of GP appointments are higher users of outpatient and inpatient hospital care but not of emergency departments, signalling high treatment burden. The pattern of 'missingness' is consistent from primary care to hospital care: patients who have patterns of missing GP appointments have patterns of missing many outpatient appointments and are more likely to experience 'irregular discharge' from in-patient care. Missingness from outpatient mental health services is very high. Policymakers, health service planners and clinicians should consider the role and contribution of 'missingness' in health care to improving patient safety and care.

SUBMITTER: Williamson AE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8224850 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesMissed hospital appointments pose a major challenge for healthcare systems. There is a lack of information about drivers of missed hospital appointments in non-Western countries and extent of variability between different types of clinics. The aim was to evaluate the rate and predictors of missed hospital appointments and variability in drivers between multiple outpatient clinics.SettingOutpatient clinics in the Royal hospital (tertiary referral hospital in Oman) between 2014 and 2018.ParticipantsAll patients with a scheduled outpatient clinic appointment (N=7 69 118).Study designRetrospective cross-sectional analysis.Primary and secondary outcome measuresA missed appointment was defined as a patient who did not show up for the scheduled hospital appointment without notifying or asking for the appointment to be cancelled or rescheduled. The outcomes were the rate and predictors of missed hospital appointments overall and variations by clinic. Conditional logistic regression compared patients who attended and those who missed their appointment.ResultsThe overall rate of missed hospital appointments was 22.3%, which varied between clinics (14.0% for Oncology and 30.3% for Urology). Important predictors were age, sex, service costs, patient's residence distance from hospital, waiting time and appointment day and season. Substantive variability between clinics in ORs for a missed appointment was present for predictors such as service costs and waiting time. Patients aged 81-90 in the Diabetes and Endocrine clinic had an adjusted OR of 0.53 for missed appointments (95% CI 0.37 to 0.74) while those in Obstetrics and Gynaecology had OR of 1.70 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.59). Adjusted ORs for longer waiting times (>120 days) were 2.22 (95% CI 2.10 to 2.34) in Urology but 1.26 (95% CI 1.18 to 1.36) in Oncology.ConclusionPredictors of a missed appointment varied between clinics in their effects. Interventions to reduce the rate of missed appointments should consider these factors and be tailored to clinic.

Project description:BackgroundRecently, studies have examined the underlying patient and practice factors for missed appointments, but less is known about the impact on patient health. People with one or more long-term conditions who fail to attend appointments may be at risk of premature death. This is the first study to examine the effect of missed primary healthcare appointments on all-cause mortality in those with long-term mental and physical health conditions.MethodsWe used a large, nationwide retrospective cohort (n = 824,374) extracted from routinely collected general practice data across Scotland over a 3-year period from September 2013 until September 2016. This data encompasses appointment history for approximately 15% of the Scottish population, and was linked to Scottish deaths records for patients who had died within a 16-month follow-up period. We generated appointment attendance history, number of long-term conditions and prescriptions data for patients. These factors were used in negative binomial and Cox's proportional hazards modelling to examine the risk of missing appointments and all-cause mortality.ResultsPatients with a greater number of long-term conditions had an increased risk of missing general practice appointments despite controlling for number of appointments made, particularly among patients with mental health conditions. These patients were at significantly greater risk of all-cause mortality, and showed a dose-based response with increasing number of missed appointments. Patients with long-term mental health conditions who missed more than two appointments per year had a greater than 8-fold increase in risk of all-cause mortality compared with those who missed no appointments. These patients died prematurely, commonly from non-natural external factors such as suicide.ConclusionsMissed appointments represent a significant risk marker for all-cause mortality, particularly in patients with mental health conditions. For these patients, existing primary healthcare appointment systems are ineffective. Future interventions should be developed with a particular focus on increasing attendance by these patients.

Project description:BackgroundFollow-up with a primary care provider within 1-2 weeks of discharge from hospital has been associated with reduced readmissions. We sought to determine appointment attendance with primary care providers postdischarge and identify factors associated with attendance.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study involving general medicine patients who had been discharged from hospital between Sept. 1, 2014, and Dec. 30, 2015, from 2 Ontario academic hospitals, and who had been supported by a transitional care specialist and advised to see a primary care provider within 1 week. Attendance was determined by self-report during follow-up by telephone. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess whether patient factors (e.g., comorbidity) or system factors (e.g., booking the appointment before discharge) predicted attendance. We used Cox proportional hazards modelling to assess whether attendance predicted readmission within 30 days.ResultsOf the 214 patients included in our study, 35% (n = 75) attended a primary care appointment within 1 week of discharge; 52% (n = 124) of patients attended an appointment within 2 weeks. After adjusting for age, sex and comorbidity, significant predictors of attendance were booking the appointment before discharge (odds ratio [OR] 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-4.40), familiarity with the primary care provider (OR 5.43, 95% CI 2.25-14.1) and inclusion of a reminder, callback number and appointment time in the discharge summary (OR 15.3, 95% CI 2.09-326). Predictors of nonattendance were the presence of a home support worker (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.80) and a booked specialist appointment before discharge (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18-0.73). Attendance was not associated with reduced readmissions (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.40-1.09).InterpretationTimely follow-up with PCPs postdischarge remains challenging. Efforts to improve attendance should focus on reinforcing need for follow-up and coordinating follow-up before discharge, particularly for those poorly connected with the health care system.

Project description:"Hospital crossover" occurs when people visit multiple hospitals for care, which may cause gaps in electronic health records. Although crossover is common among people with epilepsy, the effect on subsequent use of health services is unknown. Understanding this effect will help prioritize health care delivery innovations targeted for this population.We collected de-identified information from a health information exchange network describing 7,836 people with epilepsy who visited any of seven hospitals in New York, NY from 2009-2012. Data included demographics, comorbidities, and 2 years of visit information from ambulatory, inpatient, emergency department (ED), and radiology settings. We performed two complementary retrospective cohort analyses, in order to (1) illustrate the effect on a carefully selected subgroup, and (2) confirm the effect across the study population. First, we performed a matched cohort analysis on 410 pairs of individuals with and without hospital crossover in the baseline year. Second, we performed a propensity score odds weighted ordinal logistic regression analysis to estimate the effect across all 7,836 individuals. The outcomes were the use of six health services in the follow-up year.In the matched pair analysis, baseline hospital crossover increased the odds of more visits in the ED (odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.95) and radiology settings (1.7, 1.22-2.38). The regression analysis confirmed the ED and radiology findings, and also suggested that crossover led to more inpatient admissions (1.35, 1.11-1.63), head CTs (1.44, 1.04-2), and brain MRIs (2.32, 1.59-3.37).Baseline hospital crossover is an independent marker for subsequent increased health service use in multiple settings among people with epilepsy. Health care delivery innovations targeted for people with epilepsy who engage in hospital crossover should prioritize (1) sharing radiology images and reports (to reduce unnecessary radiology use, particularly head CTs), and (2) improving coordination of care (to reduce unnecessary ED and inpatient use).

Project description:BackgroundMissed hospital appointments are a major cause of inefficiency worldwide. Healthcare providers are increasingly using Short Message Service reminders to reduce 'Did Not Attend' (DNA) rates. Systematic reviews show that sending such reminders is effective, but there is no evidence on whether their impact is affected by their content. Accordingly, we undertook two randomised controlled trials that tested the impact of rephrasing appointment reminders on DNA rates in the United Kingdom.Trial methodsParticipants were outpatients with a valid mobile telephone number and an outpatient appointment between November 2013 and January 2014 (Trial One, 10,111 participants) or March and May 2014 (Trial Two, 9,848 participants). Appointments were randomly allocated to one of four reminder messages, which were issued five days in advance. Message assignment was then compared against appointment outcomes (appointment attendance, DNA, cancellation by patient).ResultsIn Trial One, a message including the cost of a missed appointment to the health system produced a DNA rate of 8.4%, compared to 11.1% for the existing message (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61-0.89, P<0.01). Trial Two replicated this effect (DNA rate 8.2%), but also found that expressing the same concept in general terms was significantly less effective (DNA rate 9.9%, OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00-1.48, P<0.05). Moving from the existing reminder to the more effective costs message would result in 5,800 fewer missed appointments per year in the National Health Service Trust in question, at no additional cost. The study's main limitations are that it took place in a single location in England, and that it required accurate phone records, which were only obtained for 20% of eligible patients. We conclude that missed appointments can be reduced, for no additional cost, by introducing persuasive messages to appointment reminders. Future studies could examine the impact of varying reminder messages in other health systems.Trial registrationControlled-Trials.com 49432571.

Project description:BackgroundThe global outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant changes in the delivery of health care services such as attendance of scheduled outpatient hospital appointments. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on the rate and predictors of missed hospital appointment in the Sultanate of Oman.MethodsA retrospective single-centre analysis was conducted to determine the effect of COVID-19 on missed hospital appointments at various clinics at The Royal Hospital (tertiary referral hospital) in Muscat, Sultanate of Oman. The study population included scheduled face-to-face and virtual appointments between January 2019 and March 2021. Logistic regression models were used with interaction terms (post COVID-19) to assess changes in the predictors of missed appointments.ResultsA total of 34, 3149 scheduled appointments was analysed (320,049 face-to-face and 23,100 virtual). The rate of missed face-to-face hospital appointments increased from 16.9% pre to 23.8% post start of COVID-19, particularly in early pandemic (40.5%). Missed hospital appointments were more frequent (32.2%) in virtual clinics (post COVID-19). Increases in missed face-to-face appointments varied by clinic (Paediatrics from 19.3% pre to 28.2% post; Surgery from 12.5% to 25.5%; Obstetrics & Gynaecology from 8.4% to 8.5%). A surge in the frequency of missed appointments was seen during national lockdowns for face-to-face and virtual appointments. Most predictors of missed appointments did not demonstrate any appreciable changes in effect (i.e., interaction term not statistically significant). Distance of patient residence to the hospital revealed no discernible changes in the relative effect pre and post COVID-19 for both face-to-face and virtual clinic appointments.ConclusionThe rate of missed visits in most clinics was directly impacted by COVID-19. The case mix of patients who missed their appointments did not change. Virtual appointments, introduced after start of the pandemic, also had substantial rates of missed appointments and cannot be viewed as the single approach that can overcome the problem of missing hospital appointments.